- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Social Security: We are run by imbeciles. Thieving imbeciles.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 4:56 pm to Sharlo
Posted on 3/31/26 at 4:56 pm to Sharlo
quote:I'd suggest:
It is a scam. My old man worked until he was 70. Died about one year later, shortly after starting to collect SS. My mom has since only received the greatly reduced surviving spouse benefit, even though dad payed in for 50+ years.
Thieves, all of them.
Contact SSA directly and ask them to explain in writing exactly how her benefit is calculated
Ask specifically whether she is receiving her own benefit, a survivor benefit, or a combination
However, if she claimed early, there may be limited options, but it's worth understanding exactly what happened
Posted on 3/31/26 at 5:15 pm to deuceiswild
quote:
All we've done is PAY. For decades.
You come off as irrational.
People get a low cost health insurance plan through ACA.
Then they complain about the coverages that they didn't buy with the low cost insurance plan.
People pay into social security (which does a good job not pulling the rug out on people just before they retire when the program is forced to make changes), and you seem dissatisfied with your benefits.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 5:18 pm to Covingtontiger77
If you invest SS into anything it makes it much more difficult for the polititions to steal our money.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 5:41 pm to CharlesUFarley
quote:
Surviving spouse benefits are equal to your father's benefit as long as your mother is over retirement age. If she isn't, she still gets his full amount or close to it as long as she's still caring for your father's minor children, as well as money for those children until they are 18. I am no defender of SS and I think it's a ripoff, but one of its many flaws is how it does what I just described, when a proper group insurance benefit could have been implemented at a fraction of the cost.
Your post doesn't ring true.
I'm not going to share more details here, and it has been several years since my dad passed. But at the time, we saw the dropoff in benefits my mom was receiving and checked into it. We were told the benefit was reduced in accordance with the program rules. I was young but over 18, and I don't recall the specific rationale or formula cited.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 5:44 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
I'd suggest:
Contact SSA directly and ask them to explain in writing exactly how her benefit is calculated
Ask specifically whether she is receiving her own benefit, a survivor benefit, or a combination
However, if she claimed early, there may be limited options, but it's worth understanding exactly what happened
Thanks for the advice and concern. My dad passed many years ago, and we did this when we saw my mom's benefits drop off. I was young and don't recall all the details, but those involved were satisfied with the response they got.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 6:37 pm to meansonny
quote:
People get a low cost health insurance plan through ACA.
Lol. You mean people who show no income, not those who really work for a living and pay thousands more for much less.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 6:48 pm to Covingtontiger77
I'm pretty confident if all waste, fraud, abuse and outright theft were eliminated from federal spending the US would have at a minimum a $500 billion annual surplus.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:06 pm to meansonny
I have no idea what analogy you're trying to make with this ACA crap.
The possibility of doing away with the SS program was mentioned.
Someone responded by saying they need to pay him back every cent he put in if they did that (Whether I agree with the part about "every cent" is irrelevant here).
That person was then accused of being the "bad guy", somehow. Yeah, the guy who's done nothing but PAY and FUND the program for decades, by force, is somehow the bad guy.
Then someone else piled on by saying that the guy who's pissed is the reason this country will go bankrupt and some other such nonsense.
Well, my "irrational" arse agrees with the guy who wants his money back if the program were done away with (Or at least a portion of it in my case.).
And my "irrational" arse gets even more pissed when someone calls ME the bad guy for wanting that.
So if that makes me irrational, then im guilty as charged, and you, and anyone else who agrees with you can kiss my irrational arse.
The possibility of doing away with the SS program was mentioned.
Someone responded by saying they need to pay him back every cent he put in if they did that (Whether I agree with the part about "every cent" is irrelevant here).
That person was then accused of being the "bad guy", somehow. Yeah, the guy who's done nothing but PAY and FUND the program for decades, by force, is somehow the bad guy.
Then someone else piled on by saying that the guy who's pissed is the reason this country will go bankrupt and some other such nonsense.
Well, my "irrational" arse agrees with the guy who wants his money back if the program were done away with (Or at least a portion of it in my case.).
And my "irrational" arse gets even more pissed when someone calls ME the bad guy for wanting that.
So if that makes me irrational, then im guilty as charged, and you, and anyone else who agrees with you can kiss my irrational arse.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:10 pm to meansonny
Furthermore, I am 53 and I am not receiving benefits from the program. All I do is PAY the maximum into the program every year for the last 20+ years.
I notice the pay increase every year usually around mid October.
But I'm the bad guy for wanting something back. GTFO.
I notice the pay increase every year usually around mid October.
But I'm the bad guy for wanting something back. GTFO.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:17 pm to Sharlo
quote:
Thanks for the advice and concern. My dad passed many years ago, and we did this when we saw my mom's benefits drop off. I was young and don't recall all the details, but those involved were satisfied with the response they got.
She lost her benefit. Not his.
It is part of "the widows tax" where the 2 social security payments drops down to 1. But she still has the same housing payment. Same gas bill. Same water bill. Same electric bill, etc..
And she jumps into a worse income tax situation (married jointly down to single).
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:22 pm to meansonny
quote:
Yup
I'll wear my badge of irrationality proudly
Seems to me you're either young and haven't put much into the system at all, or you're wealthy enough to offset other taxes enough that the SS tax doesn't matter to you. I honestly hope it's the latter.
But you can still frick right off for giving me shite for being pissed if the program were dissolved and millions who paid in got nothing at all for it.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:25 pm to DeathByTossDive225
Nobody is getting rid of it. It will just get inflated away.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:30 pm to meansonny
quote:
She lost her benefit. Not his.
It is part of "the widows tax" where the 2 social security payments drops down to 1. But she still has the same housing payment. Same gas bill. Same water bill. Same electric bill, etc..
And she jumps into a worse income tax situation (married jointly down to single).
That sounds right, and my point still stands. She worked her whole life, too, and was therefore robbed by our shitbird govt's Ponzi scheme.
Man, it's kind of amazing that they get away with robbing so many thousands of people every year. And we just accept it and keep voting in the same lying POS politicians.
ETA: Thanks for contributing your point.
This post was edited on 3/31/26 at 7:31 pm
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:57 pm to deuceiswild
quote:
But you can still frick right off for giving me shite for being pissed if the program were dissolved and millions who paid in got nothing at all for it.
SS hasn't been dissolved.
No one is getting "nothing".
If we are lucky, then the government will adopt trump accounts and slowly wean the citizenry off defined benefit plans and get on board with defined contribution plans.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:58 pm to Sharlo
quote:
That sounds right, and my point still stands. She worked her whole life, too, and was therefore robbed by our shitbird govt's Ponzi scheme.
Man, it's kind of amazing that they get away with robbing so many thousands of people every year. And we just accept it and keep voting in the same lying POS politicians.
ETA: Thanks for contributing your point.
So she should get 2 social security payments after her husband dies?
Posted on 3/31/26 at 8:02 pm to High C
quote:
I think that’s partially what they count on.
no partially to it, the original age to start receiving bennies was about the same as the average lifespan, has not kept up, hence the problem
Posted on 3/31/26 at 8:36 pm to Sharlo
quote:
I'm not going to share more details here, and it has been several years since my dad passed. But at the time, we saw the dropoff in benefits my mom was receiving and checked into it. We were told the benefit was reduced in accordance with the program rules. I was young but over 18, and I don't recall the specific rationale or formula cited.
I suspect what you are describing is real. If your mother was old enough, she would have been getting half of your father's benefit. When he died, she no longer got that but she did get what he got, so essentially, the household income was reduced by 1/3rd. SS paid your father X while he was alive, and paid your mother 1/2X, so together they got 1.5X. After your father passed, your mother only got X.
My mother faced the same thing. What was sufficient when they were both alive became marginal after my father departed this world, and now with hurricane insurance going up at least $1000 each year, it really isn't enough.
Kudos though to your father for working until he was 70. He left your mother 30% better off than she would have been. My mother will be 94 this year, I am dealing with these issues every day. I will be 61 this year. I want to put off SS until 67, but I may get tired of it all and just start taking it when I am 62. I want to be able to live on SS, but have good assets in my IRA's. I'm on track, and as long as I don't hook up with that Moldavian chick and go on another reckless party binge again....
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:03 pm to CharlesUFarley
quote:
Kudos though to your father for working until he was 70.
He loved his work. He also grew up poor, and it was his mission in life to make sure his wife and kids never experienced poverty. I miss him every day.
quote:
I want to be able to live on SS, but have good assets in my IRA's. I'm on track, and as long as I don't hook up with that Moldavian chick and go on another reckless party binge again....
Good for you regarding the IRAs. Watch out for those Modavians. You know what they say about that thing being undefeated....
Back to top



1



