So now leftists wants to eliminate the right to an atty

quote:

---

Wednesday

---

100% agreement.

quote:

---

American Bar Association should signal that anyone who defends the border patrol’s mistreatment of children will not be considered a member in good standing of the legal profession

---

The ABA doesn’t get to decide who is in good standing or who has license to practice.

Mmcgrath and libertarian freedom patriot Juiceterry are fapping furiously to this

Beefense5 still thinks that Les Miles' offense was perfect.

I realize this, but it’s more of these leftists resorting to methods like Doxing, and social media banning and coercing private businesses to police their political agenda.

The ABA is just as much an arm of the Democrat Party as the NYT And Twitter is. Do you think the average person who isn’t an atty would understand that an atty who is censured or banned or whatever by the ABA is a good attorney.

This attitude is pervasive among the left. The entire FISA scandal resulted from Obama/HRC/DNC delegating it’s unconstitutional behavior to private individuals or foreigners and saying- well, it’s ok bc it’s not “state action.”

Every leftist on this board responds the same way when massive communication industries from tv to internet, bans or blacklists conservatives.

This is a dangerous, slippery slope. And the fact that the NYT thinks it’s “progress” to make defendants in criminal or civil matters have no practical access to counsel bc it’s just not “nice” to represent that kind of accused person, to me is horrid, fascist and unamerican.

These people have GOT to be stopped

quote:

---

Or do you think that a lawyer is truthful when saying "safe and sanitary" conditions for children include no regard to sleep or hygiene?

---

I’ve spent a career representing people accused of bad shite. Sometimes they did it. And sometimes they didn’t.

You have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about. I hope you never get sued or arrested, or else you may have to petition the editorial board at the NYT in order to find someone who they deign appropriate to represent you, or whether you are worthy of representation.

quote:

---

This scares the absolute frick out of me that now these leftists want to decide who is entitled to legal representation.

Harvard (or was it Yale?) fired a tenured professor bc he chose to represent Harvey Weinstein. That pervo is a dirtbag, but even he has a right to any attorney.

They started with the 2nd, then they moved on to the 4th and 5th with this FISA shite, then they moved on to the 6th.

These people have to be stopped. Decisively.

---

I have made this point many, many times. We now have an entire generation of people living in America who have NO CLUE what it means to be an American

And, ANOTHER example of the reality that the left is totalitarian.

I mean honestly. Anyone pretending otherwise at this point is just a lying sack of shite in on the goal of being totalitarian.

Yes. The ABA is basically a club, with no authority to regulate attys.

But nothing stops them from telling the General Public- davyjones is a scum bag not worthy of membership in the ABA. And that’s how leftists do shite. It’s sort of like the Southern Poverty Law Center’s “list” they keep of “hate” groups (with amorphous standards defined by them), and they use it to defame their political opponents.

Leftists think you should have access to your rights if you believe what they do, but you should be excommunicated from participating in polite
society if you have a different viewpoint.

Plus promoting the idea that ANYONE isn’t entitled to a lawyer is basically inimical to the idea of the ABA, and the Legal Profession in general.