- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Snopes makes Pravda look good..re Trump mugging
Posted on 2/28/18 at 4:52 pm to BBONDS25
Posted on 2/28/18 at 4:52 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
I mean....what is the argument about? Whether the guy had taken off or not when Trump exited the vehicle? I think the relevant point is trump thought there was a dangerous situation and he inserted himself into it. It doesn't matter the timing of the mugger leaving. That is irrelevant.
I agree. I said this exact thing back on Page one.
1
Posted on 2/28/18 at 4:53 pm to BeefDawg
Posted on 2/28/18 at 4:56 pm to BeefDawg
quote:
The limo driver worked for Trump.
And that helps Rosen’s credibility.
Your crybaby arse would be calling him biased if he used one of Trump’s freaking employees to help corroborate a story like this. LOL
Of course. That's why they said he was an "unidentified" witness, to give him credibility.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 4:56 pm to texridder
quote:
How about the part where Trump said "I'm surprised you found out about this." "I didn't want to play this up."
Oh gee, so an ego maniac is feigning humility and humbleness.
Absolute shocker!
This is still nothing close to validation of your retarded conspiracy theories. LOL
Posted on 2/28/18 at 5:00 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Awe, man. Are your being reduced to just being a cheerleader?
That is really too bad.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 5:00 pm to texridder
quote:
Of course. That's why they said he was an "unidentified" witness, to give him credibility.
Now you’re back to James Rosen being a part of this grand conspiracy.
As if he wouldn’t have asserted that the witness wasn’t independent if he wasn’t. As if he couldn’t/wouldn’t have said, “Trump’s limo driver, who requested to not have his name printed.”
Keep up those mental gymnastics, bro. This is entertaining watching you look like a deranged assclown.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 5:04 pm to BeefDawg
quote:
Keep up those mental gymnastics, bro. This is entertaining watching you look like a deranged assclown.
I noticed you skipped right over the fact that Trump had been known to call the Daily News, disguise his voice, say he was his publicist, and give them press releases.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 5:16 pm to texridder
quote:
I noticed you skipped right over the fact that Trump had been known to call the Daily News, disguise his voice, say he was his publicist, and give them press releases.
Because it doesn’t effect this situation in the least.
You’re using this as a red herring or strawman.
For your bullshite conspiracy theory to work, James Rosen needs to be involved.
Good luck with that. LOL
Posted on 2/28/18 at 5:32 pm to BeefDawg
quote:
For your bull shite conspiracy theory to work, James Rosen needs to be involved.
No he doesn't. All that Trump has to do is say that his driver doesn't want to be identified when he is interviewed.
Problem solved.
quote:
I noticed you skipped right over the fact that Trump had been known to call the Daily News, disguise his voice, say he was his publicist, and give them press releases.
quote:
Because it doesn’t effect this situation in the least.
You’re using this as a red herring or strawman.
Not either one. It is evidence to impeach Trump's statement in the story that Trump told Rosen: "I'm surprised you found out about this." "I didn't want to play this up."
No way Trump said that.
And you know, if you think a witness lies about one thing, you are free to assume that the witness not credible to testify about the matter.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 5:37 pm to TH03
quote:
One witness says the mugger ran off before Trump got there, one says he ran him off. You're deciding to believe the one that fits your narrative.
You miscounted. Trump is also a witness in the article.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 6:07 pm to texridder
quote:
No he doesn't. All that Trump has to do is say that his driver doesn't want to be identified when he is interviewed.
Problem solved.
LOL, and Rosen would go, “Screw you.”, or at the very least tell the readers the witness is not independent.
This is hilarious watching you base an entire argument on bullshite you have to completely pull out of your arse.
Go get help. Trump has buttfricked your brain into terminal derangement. ROFL
Posted on 2/28/18 at 6:15 pm to BeefDawg
quote:Do you still believe in 398.2?
LOL, and Rosen would go, “Screw you.”, or at the very least tell the readers the witness is not independent.
And you still haven't addressed the fact that the New York Daily News was the paper that Trump used to call and identify himself as John Trump, disguise his voice, and give them press releases about himself.
Now don't just answer the easy one and ignore the tough one. Be brave.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 6:18 pm to texridder
quote:
Why does the witness have the EXACT SAME STORY as Trump?
because that's what actually happened.
Duh.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 6:43 pm to texridder
quote:
Do you still believe in 398.2?
That is classic irony right there. The clown needing fairytales to support his entire argument is mocking someone else about fairytales.
quote:
And you still haven't addressed the fact that the New York Daily News was the paper that Trump used to call and identify himself as John Trump, disguise his voice, and give them press releases about himself.
Yeah, I did address this. It’s irrelevant and a strawman.
There is zero basis for it being a part of this debate unless you’re insisting that James Rosen was part of some elaborate conspiracy to paint Trump as a brave swell guy.
And then everyone involved has gone along with the charade and kept their mouth shut all these years after the reporting went public.
Good shite, man. Delusional AF, but good entertaining shite.
Retards like you are gold coat members of the retard community.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 8:19 pm to BeefDawg
quote:
That is classic irony right there. The clown needing fairytales to support his entire argument is mocking someone else about fairytales.
The fairy tales is you thinking that Rosen "would go, 'Screw you', or at the very least tell the readers the witness is not independent.
Yea, he's gonna get Trump mad at him and miss out on any more Trump stories. All he has to do is what he did do. He said the witness requested anonymity. No skin off his nose.
Now, I can't think of a good reason why a witness would request anonymity in that situation, unless it was the limo driver.
How about you? You got a good reason why a witness wouldn't want famous, rich, Mr.Trump to know he did him a solid by backing up his story?
quote:
And then everyone involved has gone along with the charade and kept their mouth shut all these years after the reporting went public.
Who exactly, is everybody?
Posted on 2/28/18 at 9:01 pm to texridder
quote:
Now, I can't think of a good reason why a witness would request anonymity in that situation, unless it was the limo driver.
How about you? You got a good reason why a witness wouldn't want famous, rich, Mr.Trump to know he did him a solid by backing up his story?
You're telling me everyone loves having their name in the newspaper for the world to see?
LOL, GTFO.
This guy could have been anybody. There's a lot of people who appreciate privacy and anonymity. Criminals. Attorneys. Professional athletes. Celebrities. Politicians. Adulterers who don't want their spouse knowing they were on a certain NYC street corner at 8pm on a Friday evening. Private fricking introverted people.
shite, I could make this list 100 examples long, but FU.
Again, you're a fricking imbecile. LOL
quote:
Who exactly, is everybody?
The 4 other people that were in Trump's limo with him. All the rest of the crowd apparently standing there also watching.
You're suggesting none of these people read this article? You're suggesting that if after reading this article, none of these people went to the media and called it a fake story, if it is supposedly fake as you're claiming?
That's a lot of people who apparently care enough about Trump to allow him to plant a bullshite fake story in the news and get away with it.
Or... maybe your conspiracy theory is stupid and wrong. LMAO
Posted on 3/1/18 at 10:16 am to mindbreaker
quote:Here's a perfect example.
Sure it does a fact checking website is fake news now LMAO Baaaa you little sheep to whatever your shepherd tells you and get back to me when you learn to think for yourselves you mindless drones.
Remember Jason Kessler, the alleged organizer of the "nazis" in Charlottesville? It was reported that he was an Obama ally who had been involved with Occupy.
Snopes, ever the spin machine, decided not to "fact check" any of this and instead just has an article claiming that Kessler went "from being a darling of the alt-right movement to a target of one of their paranoid conspiracy theories."
LINK
So, it's a conspiracy theory.
Except that it was originally reported by the right wing crackpots at THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER.
And is true, btw. Maybe Snopes' owners, provable Hillary supporters, have an agenda. Just like "Politifact" is owned by a newspaper that endorsed Hillary and other Dems, or The Onion, that was bought by a major Hillary donor before changing their brand of "satire."
"Fact check sites?"
Yeah, right.
Page 9 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News