- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Snopes makes Pravda look good..re Trump mugging
Posted on 2/28/18 at 11:52 am to Strannix
Posted on 2/28/18 at 11:52 am to Strannix
Just a reminder that this is snopes:
Well, at least it was before he decided to leave mrs. snopes (something I can understand although he isn’t much of a catch himself) for a literal hooker, who by the way, is still an escort.
The main fact-checker is a dominatrix obsessed with Harry Potter themed porn. Can’t say I’m too surprised.
Well, at least it was before he decided to leave mrs. snopes (something I can understand although he isn’t much of a catch himself) for a literal hooker, who by the way, is still an escort.
The main fact-checker is a dominatrix obsessed with Harry Potter themed porn. Can’t say I’m too surprised.
This post was edited on 2/28/18 at 11:54 am
1
Posted on 2/28/18 at 11:55 am to PuddinPopPharmacist
So we can’t trust people who paid someone for sex?
Intradesting
Intradesting
Posted on 2/28/18 at 11:55 am to mindbreaker
quote:
and to the sheep on the Poliboard those two items = Snopes is a liberal site
It's funny. Write something negative about Snopes and watch the hard line left rush to defend. There's only one reason you folks are so pro Snopes
Snopes "fact checkers" google info, just like you and I. They have no more credibility, or oversight than we do
I skip the middleman who's trying to influence what I think and do the research myself, via google just like Snopes does.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 11:57 am to RogerTheShrubber
It’s just funny the only times I see people bitch about snopes is someone on the right who’s heard the conspiracy stuff around their circles and doesn’t see it as definite ‘truth’ on snopes.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:00 pm to olddawg26
quote:
So we can’t trust people who paid someone for sex? Intradesting
You would take personal offense since I’m sure you’re no stranger to Asian massage parlors, but how about someone who embezzled company money for their hooker escapades? I also like for my “facts” to come from someone who describes their workday as
“ Describing her day-off activities on another blog, she wrote that she 'played scrabble, smoked pot, and posted to Snopes.' She added, 'That's what I did on my day "on," too.'“
Interadisting
LINK
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:00 pm to TH03
quote:
cries of “There’s Trump!” went through the crowd of onlookers
The keyword here is onlookers. So let’s break this down. You have a guy with a bat mugging someone and you have a crowd basically standing around watching, but not getting involved. These are the onlookers. Next you have Trump, riding by in his limo. He has the limo stop and is seen by these onlookers as heading through the crowd and to the victim and the mugger. The point that no one else is making is that while everyone else was standing around and watching, Trump was taking action. Did he catch the mugger? No, he did not, but that’s irrelevant... and now a modern example of standing around vs taking action. The cop in Florida standing outside with his gun drawn vs the coaches who ran into the building unarmed to protect kids. The situations aren’t equivalent, but it’s a great contrast of people who wait for others to act and those who act. Which one are you?
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:00 pm to olddawg26
quote:
It’s just funny the only times I see people bitch about snopes is someone on the right who’s heard the conspiracy stuff around their circles and doesn’t see it as definite ‘truth’ on snopes.
I've already shown how Snopes was disingenuous on this particular topic alone.
Yet you're still acting like they are credible and we're loons for defending against people who use them to throw shade.
SMH
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:01 pm to olddawg26
This whole thing is pathetic. Trump says something idiotic, so his flock go and dig up a fictional story concocted by "John Barron" to make him look like a super hero.
He's confirmed, himself, his own cowardice many times
He's confirmed, himself, his own cowardice many times
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:01 pm to olddawg26
quote:
It’s just funny the only times I see people bitch about snopes is someone on the right who’s heard the conspiracy stuff around their circles and doesn’t see it as definite ‘truth’ on snopes.
That's weird, because David himself claims he's received a lot of criticism in the early days from lefties. It's in the linked article
They do not adhere to journalistic standards. I'm not sure why it's so hard for you to understand.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:01 pm to BeefDawg
quote:
So you're saying that something that is statistically impossible isn't quantifiable as tangible proof?
And you're calling me dumb?
Where do you retards come from? How do you make it through a day without dying in some retard accident?
Do you know what the word tangible means?
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:03 pm to BeefDawg
I don’t think they’re that credible. I just think it’s funny y’all do all sorts of research and delve into the guys personal life over snopes but don’t say shite when bengal and jjdoc spam the board with infowars and gatewaypundit. Just wanna know why the difference in how you treat sources.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:03 pm to BeefDawg
quote:
Yet you're still acting like they are credible
Snopes is an opinion site. I'm not sure why they are struggling to grasp
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:04 pm to olddawg26
quote:
I don’t think they’re that credible.
Then what's the argument about
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:05 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
This whole thing is pathetic. Trump says something idiotic, so his flock go and dig up a fictional story concocted by "John Barron" to make him look like a super hero.
You are such a trash poster.
Story reported by James Rosen back in 91.
Yes, they concocted a story where one independent witness some how magically has the exact same facts as Trump, and to support the story, they got another fake witness to give....... a different version of events.
Sounds like a brilliantly planned and executed PR stunt!
You frickin idiot.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:06 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Yeah not mine. I wanna know why you’re so silent when bullshite gets posted 100 times a day and you’re vocal when it’s once a month on snopes.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:08 pm to olddawg26
quote:
wanna know why you’re so silent when bullshite gets posted 100 times a day
Whoa whoa whoa....
Link?
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:09 pm to TH03
quote:
Do you know what the word tangible means?
Oh, so now you're trying semantics?
Tangible also means ADJECTIVE "material, real, substantial, corporeal, solid"
It doesn't always mean "physically touchable", you illiterate buffoon.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:09 pm to RogerTheShrubber
try again sheep I just ripped the validity of that article when some other sheep linked it earlier.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:09 pm to RogerTheShrubber
I’m not linking every thread jjdoc and bengal post where you have asked them to use a source that isn’t biased
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:10 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
It's funny. Write something negative about Snopes and watch the hard line left rush to defend. There's only one reason you folks are so pro Snopes
I never did this. I'm just saying them putting unproven isn't some ridiculous conspiracy.
Page 4 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News