- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Snopes makes Pravda look good..re Trump mugging
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:26 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:26 pm to RogerTheShrubber
That drives my point home even further. Why would he focus on the left here?
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:26 pm to BeefDawg
quote:
Yes, you see where the adjective says "material, real, substantial, corporeal"?
And what fits that definition in this case? We have 2 witnesses that have 2 different stories.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:26 pm to mindbreaker
quote:
No you didn't but I honestly believe you really think you did
Can you explain how two people interviewed separately, that have no affiliation, can some how get a version of events wrong with the exact same details?
Without accusing this of being some retarded conspiracy between a half dozen people?
What are the chances that you and I could fabricate some event details of some random circumstance and both say the exact same thing?
Once you realize it is a statistical impossibility, you will have no choice but to agree their version of events must be true.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:28 pm to Strannix
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:28 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Your comprehension needs work.
Snopes is an opinion site. Their journalistic standards are extremely low.
Opinion sites present their opinion, which is what Snopes does
Damn, you mean they're lower than the MSM? Can you get lower standards than the MSM?
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:29 pm to olddawg26
quote:
Why would he focus on the left here?
Rex? He's a lefty but not an far as he pushes on here. He just pushes buttons.
He's Cap'n Bengal of the other side of the aisle
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:31 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
1991, right after Trump's worth and status had plummeted like never before, a NY tabloid runs a story on him being a super hero.
You didn't even have the journalist correct, and we're supposed to take your opinion on this?
James Rosen isn't some tabloid clown, you idiot.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:32 pm to Walkthedawg
quote:
Damn, you mean they're lower than the MSM?
Actually yes...
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:35 pm to BeefDawg
quote:
You didn't even have the journalist correct,
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:38 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Rex?
Noooo.... the guy who just said he focus’s on the left because it’s so lopsided here.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:41 pm to olddawg26
quote:
Rex posts the most liberal bullshite on this site. 2-3 threads a day which are literally shredded alive. Hundreds of downvotes and people make fun of him. Meanwhile there are multiple posters who post close to 50 threads a day citing sources way more biased than something like snopes. Now I need you to seriously try and be honest, why do you think it’s lopsided TOWARDS THE LEFT? Why would you focus on the 8% of the board that doesn’t think far right? Do you think that might have to do with your personal ideology?
This is stupid. You're suggesting that there is more fallacy and lies by Righties here than there is Lefties. And that simply isn't true.
Hell, probably 80%+ of what every Righty posts here is defense of a false accusation by Lefties. And then it's a debate of one side trying to prove their case against the other.
Somebody is being truthful and someone is being dishonest. The Left, the VAST MAJORITY of the time is dishonest.
You're being intellectually dishonest right now, in fact. Inferring that this place is 92% Rightwing "bias" that needs focusing on to be made "objective". In other words, you're inferring most of the Rightwing information here is bullshite.
Go frick yourself. You're a shite poster on the Dawg forum and you're a shite poster here too.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:43 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Obama flashed erection to people
Michelle criticized 9/11 by saying “all this over a damn flag”
Trump stops a mugging
All unproven on snopes.
I wanna know why were only focusing on the trump one. Why do people single out this game particular one and have a tantrum over to discredit the whole site? I want answers people.
Michelle criticized 9/11 by saying “all this over a damn flag”
Trump stops a mugging
All unproven on snopes.
I wanna know why were only focusing on the trump one. Why do people single out this game particular one and have a tantrum over to discredit the whole site? I want answers people.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:45 pm to olddawg26
quote:
wanna know why were only focusing on the trump one. Why do people single out this game particular one and have a tantrum over to discredit the whole site? I want answers people.
Nah, you want answers that fit your preconceived notions.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:45 pm to SUB
quote:
And what fits that definition in this case? We have 2 witnesses that have 2 different stories.
The fact it is a statistical impossibility for one of the witnesses and Trump to have had the same exact version of events and be wrong is "substantial and real" proof that this is a true event as Trump stated.
Basic application of logic, brofus.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:46 pm to BeefDawg
quote:
You're suggesting that there is more fallacy and lies by Righties here than there is Lefties. And that simply isn't true.
What I’m saying is that there’s more shite sources posted here by right leaning people than left simply due to the nature of the boards population. If you want to compare how often snopes is used as a source as infowars and gatewaypundit then I guess you can try and debate that they’re about equal but I will own you.
Also I know you’re just mad and lashing out but what have I ever said on the UGA board that makes me a shite poster? One example or I win. I’m a completely different person over therez
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:46 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Care to refute my point yet again? Wouldn’t a liberal site say false to obama flashing his dick?
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:46 pm to BeefDawg
quote:
in fact. Inferring that this place is 92% Rightwing "bias"
It may be 80% but a lot of issues cross over party lines. He focuses only on the things that support his bias vs "this board"
Posted on 2/28/18 at 12:53 pm to BeefDawg
quote:
There are 3 accounts, and two of them match exactly.
Yea, the 2 accounts that match are Trump's account and that of the "unidentified" witness.
The only named/identified witness said the mugger was gone when Trump got out of his limo. And if there was a beating with a baseball bat, and a Doctor attending the victim, and an ambulance called to the scene -- why no police report?
This post was edited on 2/28/18 at 12:55 pm
Posted on 2/28/18 at 1:01 pm to olddawg26
quote:
Also I know you’re just mad and lashing out but what have I ever said on the UGA board that makes me a shite poster? One example or I win. I’m a completely different person over therez
I think I remember debating with you about the guy who was hit on the dirt track, plus you've been involved in many political discussions over there as well and always end up playing the contrarian with Lefty tendencies. Always coming off like a pompous douche in those discussions, same as you do here.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 1:03 pm to BeefDawg
quote:
I think I remember
You thought wrong. No idea what you’re talking about dirt track?
quote:
you've been involved in many political discussions over there
Not really at all. Maybe slightly contrarian in a couple but “many”? I actually know and like some of those guys there so I’m more myself and normal. It’s different over here.
Popular
Back to top


1






