- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sniper was fired for not holding off on death shot?
Posted on 7/17/24 at 12:19 pm to Night Vision
Posted on 7/17/24 at 12:19 pm to Night Vision
Ehhh, this smells bullshitty
Posted on 7/17/24 at 12:23 pm to Night Vision
These two guys didnt even fire a shot. She needs to get her facts straight.
Posted on 7/17/24 at 12:24 pm to Night Vision
This smells like BS to me he may have been put on administrative leave, which would probably be SOP.
Posted on 7/17/24 at 12:25 pm to Night Vision
quote:
Talks like she knows the guy, but who really knows?
First of all I dont think that guy was the one who shot the perp. It was reported the day after that the SS sniper that shot the perp was 500 yds out. This guy was only 150ish yds and allegedly had a tree obscuring the view.
However, I have not seen any info since that said where the SS sniper was in this scenario.
Posted on 7/17/24 at 12:27 pm to DownSouthJukin
quote:
Also, from the moment this occurred, and video of these two guys surfaced, it's pretty obvious they didn't have eyes on the shooter and were surprised when shots rang out fr
Wtf are you saying. It’s obvious they’re looking directly at the shooter but likely didn’t see the rifle yet
Posted on 7/17/24 at 12:27 pm to Night Vision
The problem with your post is that the sniper who shot Crooks was not named Jonathan Willis.
Clown world...
Clown world...
Posted on 7/17/24 at 12:28 pm to Night Vision
An X post of a TikTok of a 4Chan post.
Kind of impressive the depth of social media at play here.
Kind of impressive the depth of social media at play here.
Posted on 7/17/24 at 12:34 pm to Snipe
quote:
There were two CS teams, there is no video footage of the 2nd team that eliminated the threat.
There is no info on the other team at all. Except that they might have been a little less than 500yds away?
Which of course would have extended the security perimeter, which the building the shooter was on didn’t cover. None of this makes sense at all.
Posted on 7/17/24 at 12:36 pm to Proximo
quote:
Wtf are you saying. It’s obvious they’re looking directly at the shooter but likely didn’t see the rifle yet
No they weren't, and it's pretty obvious that they weren't, and they shite the bed when the shots were fired.
This is a good analysis showing that the counter-snipers were not looking at the shooter at all and had to re-orient when the shots were fired (for those who can't tell from just watching the original video): LINK
This post was edited on 7/17/24 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 7/17/24 at 12:51 pm to Night Vision
This is bull shite. I don't even think that's the sniper who took out the shooter.
Popular
Back to top

0






