Started By
Message

re: Sniper was fired for not holding off on death shot?

Posted on 7/17/24 at 12:19 pm to
Posted by Pax Regis
Alabama
Member since Sep 2007
14893 posts
Posted on 7/17/24 at 12:19 pm to
Ehhh, this smells bullshitty
Posted by lgh
In your head
Member since Jan 2019
239 posts
Posted on 7/17/24 at 12:21 pm to
Yep. It was the other team
Posted by DatNolaClap
New Orleans
Member since Mar 2015
1924 posts
Posted on 7/17/24 at 12:23 pm to
These two guys didnt even fire a shot. She needs to get her facts straight.
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
23889 posts
Posted on 7/17/24 at 12:24 pm to
This smells like BS to me he may have been put on administrative leave, which would probably be SOP.
Posted by GetmorewithLes
UK Basketball Fan
Member since Jan 2011
22276 posts
Posted on 7/17/24 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

Talks like she knows the guy, but who really knows?


First of all I dont think that guy was the one who shot the perp. It was reported the day after that the SS sniper that shot the perp was 500 yds out. This guy was only 150ish yds and allegedly had a tree obscuring the view.

However, I have not seen any info since that said where the SS sniper was in this scenario.
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
22054 posts
Posted on 7/17/24 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

Also, from the moment this occurred, and video of these two guys surfaced, it's pretty obvious they didn't have eyes on the shooter and were surprised when shots rang out fr

Wtf are you saying. It’s obvious they’re looking directly at the shooter but likely didn’t see the rifle yet
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
133653 posts
Posted on 7/17/24 at 12:27 pm to
The problem with your post is that the sniper who shot Crooks was not named Jonathan Willis.

Clown world...
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
17166 posts
Posted on 7/17/24 at 12:28 pm to
An X post of a TikTok of a 4Chan post.

Kind of impressive the depth of social media at play here.
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
22782 posts
Posted on 7/17/24 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

There were two CS teams, there is no video footage of the 2nd team that eliminated the threat.


There is no info on the other team at all. Except that they might have been a little less than 500yds away?

Which of course would have extended the security perimeter, which the building the shooter was on didn’t cover. None of this makes sense at all.
Posted by DownSouthJukin
1x tRant Poster of the Millennium
Member since Jan 2014
31444 posts
Posted on 7/17/24 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Wtf are you saying. It’s obvious they’re looking directly at the shooter but likely didn’t see the rifle yet


No they weren't, and it's pretty obvious that they weren't, and they shite the bed when the shots were fired.

This is a good analysis showing that the counter-snipers were not looking at the shooter at all and had to re-orient when the shots were fired (for those who can't tell from just watching the original video): LINK

This post was edited on 7/17/24 at 12:39 pm
Posted by KCSilverTiger
KCMO
Member since Sep 2022
976 posts
Posted on 7/17/24 at 12:51 pm to
This is bull shite. I don't even think that's the sniper who took out the shooter.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram