- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Shawn Ryan to Joe Rogan, prepare for "October 7th-style attacks".
Posted on 9/28/24 at 7:20 am to jp4lsu
Posted on 9/28/24 at 7:20 am to jp4lsu
quote:
A friend sent me a message that said they stopped a shipment of 9 surface to air missiles at the mexican border. He said it was from some guy David Rodriguez.
That’s the scariest part about this open border bullshite. We have no clue what is coming in. Hell, half our stuff from Afghanistan could be funneled back here arming foreign gangs.
0
Posted on 9/28/24 at 7:23 am to dafif
I think their hate for the US and western civilization is greater than their fear of their home country getting wiped out. They’re going to act quickly and do something because they know Trump will close their pipeline at the border. If Kamala gets in, no rush, they’ll wait until every piece falls into place before they’ll attack.
Posted on 9/28/24 at 7:45 am to tketaco
quote:
I bet he's selling a book.
If his intro is consistently "retired Navy SEAL" (or retired Delta, SF, whatever) then he's selling something. That doesn't mean he's wrong on a particular topic, but adjust your credibility score accordingly.
Posted on 9/28/24 at 8:09 am to theunknownknight
quote:
if these fruitcakes roll up in my area, they are going to be mowed down from 15 different angles 200 yards out
They're likely going to attack soft targets with as many hapless and unarmed people as possible. They're not going to roll up to country fest in rural Alabama.
The scariest part of this whole thing is the tactical planning and amassing as many assets as possible across the US before the first attack. They know once the first attack happens, even Dems will have no choice but to shut down the border and beef up border security.
Posted on 9/28/24 at 8:23 am to prouddawg
No they wouldn’t. Rural is being inundated with Haitians and nothing being done.
Posted on 9/28/24 at 8:41 am to The Pirate King
quote:
The scariest part of this whole thing is the tactical planning and amassing as many assets as possible across the US before the first attack. They know once the first attack happens, even Dems will have no choice but to shut down the border and beef up border security.
I do not think people understand how many minutemen exist in the US. It's the largest land army in the world and probably 1/2 are more have been prepping for this since 1776.
Posted on 9/28/24 at 8:43 am to tide06
It will come after the election because I promise you they want Kamala to win this thing.
Posted on 9/28/24 at 8:49 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
I wouldn't be surprised if it happend in LA or SF. Mass population areas with lax surveillance
My main worry is terror aimed at densely populated events such as a college football game. In any event, the sheer number of willing terrorists let through our southern border could overwhelm security and first responders and being in a gun free zone will only exacerbate the issue. Of course, it all depends on where our traitorous government officials believe an attack would have the most negative effect on our population.
This post was edited on 9/28/24 at 8:50 am
Posted on 9/28/24 at 11:06 am to mtntiger
quote:
Pretty sure they won't be targeting any place where the good ole boys hang out.
Way too many target-rich, gun-free zones to go after in this fricked up society.
The most recent large attacks over the last couple of years have been extremely large, festive gatherings, along with a huge concert or two.
If they go small, I'd wager malls, schools, hospitals, and old folks homes. Those are soft targets with either heavy potential body count, or high emotional impact.
States like NY, I'm wagering they'd attack the trains. Shut down a lot of business with commuters unable, or unwilling to go to work.
But yeah. I've got some 308 rounds that are starting to chant "FAFO"
Posted on 9/28/24 at 11:38 am to theunknownknight
quote:
Not sure if I care. And I am not trying to be harsh. But these same Muslims wouldn't condemn the actions either.
And let's not forget how so many of them feel about us, either.
Posted on 9/28/24 at 2:54 pm to TexasForever81
quote:
This shows how ignorant you are off the topic and are just saying shite to try make someone else look foolish.
Look into the firearm restrictions if Israeli citizens on 10/7/2023 and how they changed immediately.
Saying “probably” isn’t a pass to spew whatever ill informed drivel you feel like posting.
I'm by no means arguing the point about being armed. To make that clear. Agreed, Israel has gun control, that we don't want here. Absolutely agreed.
Israel though. Is a place living under threat.
That toughens people up, and prepares them.
Not like so many people living here in a country that has been at peace for so long, and is going soft.
By and large, in this country, the soft sheep outnumbers the hardened wolves.
Posted on 9/28/24 at 2:58 pm to cadillacattack
quote:
Water supply
Poisoning a water supply would create a really big psychological effect. And considerable damage before it was discovered.
Electrical lines. And relay stations.
Our energy grid is a massive weakness. And left entirely too vulnerable.
This post was edited on 9/28/24 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 9/28/24 at 3:04 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Kamala is currently vowing to sign the meaningless and agenda stacked 'border bill' that she claims Trump sabotaged.
Down voting. Hugely important.
Regardless who is prez, bills like that thing should never reach the Oval Office.
Posted on 9/28/24 at 3:12 pm to The Pirate King
quote:
They know once the first attack happens, even Dems will have no choice but to shut down the border and beef up border security.
Ummm...
Democrats. They let terrorists burn down towns, and cheered them on. Some even openly encouraged more to take to the streets.
Democrats. Obama refused to call terrorists terrorists. And instead repeatedly said that we should embrace them with tolerance and understanding.
I'm sorry King. But I think that you're thinking of before the country turned to clown world. If this was 30 years ago, I'd agree with you.
Posted on 9/28/24 at 3:15 pm to Wolfwireless
quote:
I'm by no means arguing the point about being armed. To make that clear. Agreed, Israel has gun control, that we don't want here. Absolutely agreed. Israel though. Is a place living under threat. That toughens people up, and prepares them. Not like so many people living here in a country that has been at peace for so long, and is going soft. By and large, in this country, the soft sheep outnumbers the hardened wolves.
I have typed out several responses and can’t send them. Because I’m probably wrong.
I think 1/2 of America would be able to put up a fight. 10% would probably help fund and shelter the illegals. And the other 40% would be so worthless they would hinder everything.
I don’t know. I still have faith in us. That flag will still wave once the smoke clears.
Posted on 9/28/24 at 3:18 pm to Penrod
quote:
The point is that everyone is tough until the shite starts.
I know. I’m sorry for the a-hole response I gave you. The first part of your post was spot on. I guess the second paragraph aggravated me too a point of being a jerk.
Posted on 9/28/24 at 3:18 pm to fischd1
quote:
will come after the election because I promise you they want Kamala to win this thing.
I don't know for sure.
If we had. Another 9/11 event, Joe would rubber-stamp whatever gestapo bill they put on his tiny desk.
9/11 gave us one of the worst bills this country ever wrote.
Followed by Obama's addition to existing law, allowing people to be detained, indefinitely without charges, on suspicion of terrorism.
This post was edited on 9/28/24 at 3:21 pm
Posted on 9/28/24 at 3:20 pm to BamaScoop
quote:
The problem is going to be that a lot of innocent Muslim like people will be killed
Islam is wholly incompatible with western society.
The "innocent" Muslims would murder you where you sit in the name of their religion and sleep like babies at night afterwards.
Posted on 9/28/24 at 3:43 pm to TexasForever81
quote:
I have typed out several responses and can’t send them. Because I’m probably wrong.
I think 1/2 of America would be able to put up a fight. 10% would probably help fund and shelter the illegals. And the other 40% would be so worthless they would hinder everything.
I don’t know. I still have faith in us. That flag will still wave once the smoke clears.
Yeah, I've done that before too
I think you're right. As far as some of the smaller towns, and more community driven areas are concerned.
The big cities tho. I think a very large percentage of folks won't get involved, until the bear is at their door.
I grew up in a small town, like what we've been thinking of. But after I lived on the east coast, it did a lot to ruin my faith in people's willingness to fight back.
I think you're right, about some folks harboring some of the threat. I hope, sincerely, that they end up regretting that choice.
That last 40%. That you mentioned. It leaves a question in my mind. Do we fight to protect them?
Posted on 9/28/24 at 7:55 pm to Wolfwireless
quote:
Yeah, I've done that before too I think you're right. As far as some of the smaller towns, and more community driven areas are concerned. The big cities tho. I think a very large percentage of folks won't get involved, until the bear is at their door. I grew up in a small town, like what we've been thinking of. But after I lived on the east coast, it did a lot to ruin my faith in people's willingness to fight back. I think you're right, about some folks harboring some of the threat. I hope, sincerely, that they end up regretting that choice. That last 40%. That you mentioned. It leaves a question in my mind. Do we fight to protect them?
You may have missed it, but I kind of proposed that question very early in the thread. When do you go and defend the country? Your town? Or just your home? I was genuinely curious when I asked.
The big cities are lost anyway. I don’t mean for this to sound any way other than it’s typed, but will sound awful. why I do I care, in podunk Texas if it’s Jamal or Akbar getting shot in Chicago. Or New York? Or LA? I’m sure that’s horrible sounding, but I only mean it from a small town standpoint vs an overtaken city.
I’ve lived in Dallas and I hated it. I’ve lived in Alaska and loved it. Born and raised where I am now. Home.
Maybe America will react like Bama when they are underdogs in their own turf. Ha.
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News