Several states laws prevent removing Biden for their ballot

They'll find a loophole.

this news doesn't sound correct. if we had multiple candidates whom none reached majority delegates, then you have a contested Convention. *party ticket would be decided at the Convention, and still get on the ballot....


Each candidate who withdraws prior to a convention has their delegates become "free"...biden withdraws for 2024 race, we have a contested convention......

Haven't looked at the other states, but Charlie Kirk is wrong about Wisconsin.

quote:

---

8.16 Partisan nominations.
(7) Nominees chosen at a national convention and under s. 8.18 (2) by each party entitled to a partisan primary ballot shall be the party's candidates for president, vice president and presidential electors. The state or national chairperson of each such party shall certify the names of the party's nominees for president and vice president to the commission no later than 5 p.m. on the first Tuesday in September preceding a presidential election. Each name shall be in one of the formats authorized in s. 7.08 (2) (a).

---

They have both been nominated. The convention is nothing more than a mere formality and fantasy for the goofballs who realize Joe is a horrible leader and candidate. The last real contested convention was 1952. The primaries and caucuses are the nominating process now no matter how much the Left wants to pretend it isn’t. The last candidate to essentially come out of “nowhere” was 1924, a century ago and that was only because no one had secured a majority which has nothing in common with today’s imagined scenario

SO suppose a candidate died in September, heaven forbid. There are no rules to allow a replacement?

quote:

---

They'll find a loophole.

---

Like in New Jersey in 2002 after Bob Toricelli resigned after the deadline to replace him on the ballot? Frank Lautenberg was placed on the ballot and beat Doug Forrester when the latter should have won by default.

quote:

---

A federal criminal investigation into Torricelli was dropped in early 2002.[18][19] In the summer of 2002, however, Torricelli received a formal letter of admonishment from the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Ethics following an investigation into his alleged receipt of improper gifts from campaign donor David Chang, who had pleaded guilty to violating federal election laws.[20][21][22] Torricelli apologized to voters for his behavior and delivered a speech in which he promised to take "'full personal responsibility'" for his actions. On September 30, 2002, Torricelli ended his 2002 re-election campaign after Republicans "successfully made the incumbent's ethics troubles -- stemming from illegal 1996 campaign donations and questionable gifts -- a campaign issue..."[20] Shortly thereafter, the New Jersey Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the Democratic Party could legally replace Torricelli's name on the ballot with that of former U.S. Senator Frank Lautenberg.[23][24]

---