- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Send this to all of the emotion-based female voters you know
Posted on 4/20/23 at 1:11 pm to FlexDawg
Posted on 4/20/23 at 1:11 pm to FlexDawg
All these far left policies that are contrary to traditional Democrat policies only intensifies the questions of elections being rigged. How in the world are women's rights groups not protesting and marching in the streets against this transgender policy?
After all the fights womens rights groups have fought for to break the glass ceiling, have equal rights, have equal opportunities ... in a MAN's world, and yet now they are perfectly OK to have a males step into their hard fought spaces and protected areas? It just makes no sense.
So how far are women willing to let this go. Today they may look at this as just some kids wanting to play sports, but what happens to all the equality rights when the argument is that under this progresssive rule, there are no sexes except those that you choose to identify with?
How does this work with Women owned businesses that receive government contract? How does this work with discrimination suits filed by women? It seems as though a lawyer representing a defendant in woman's discrimination suit would somehow bring these new policies into their defense. Ask the court to define a woman and the precedent that I would bring forth are these lawsuits where government official after government official, doctors and health professionals are on the record of no longer being able to define a woman. If you cannot define a woman then how can their any longer be laws that protect them or give them equal or preferential treatment?????
After all the fights womens rights groups have fought for to break the glass ceiling, have equal rights, have equal opportunities ... in a MAN's world, and yet now they are perfectly OK to have a males step into their hard fought spaces and protected areas? It just makes no sense.
So how far are women willing to let this go. Today they may look at this as just some kids wanting to play sports, but what happens to all the equality rights when the argument is that under this progresssive rule, there are no sexes except those that you choose to identify with?
How does this work with Women owned businesses that receive government contract? How does this work with discrimination suits filed by women? It seems as though a lawyer representing a defendant in woman's discrimination suit would somehow bring these new policies into their defense. Ask the court to define a woman and the precedent that I would bring forth are these lawsuits where government official after government official, doctors and health professionals are on the record of no longer being able to define a woman. If you cannot define a woman then how can their any longer be laws that protect them or give them equal or preferential treatment?????
Posted on 4/20/23 at 1:37 pm to FlexDawg
That might convert some women if they weren’t under the impression that we are all a bunch of neanderthals who think women are all just emotion-based inferiors.
Posted on 4/20/23 at 10:23 pm to SuperOcean
quote:
Not one democrat thinks that protecting the integrity of female sports is a good idea ..
This post was edited on
I do.
Posted on 4/20/23 at 10:44 pm to TigerAttorney
Republicans are not racist. They don’t want to kill black babies in the womb like Demorats.
Posted on 4/20/23 at 11:30 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
In the mind of a woman, that will turn them against Republicans.
They've been programmed to destroy themselves.
And yet once again the founding fathers were right
Posted on 4/20/23 at 11:36 pm to TigerAttorney
quote:
It would work if Republicans would be reasonable about abortion and not go as far right as humanly possible like they are.
Not sure why all the downvotes. This is correct. Lindsey Graham used this to sabotage the midterms and insure the Dems kept the Senate. Otherwise they might have been able to impeach Mayorkas by now.
Posted on 4/21/23 at 12:51 am to NineLineBind
quote:
Thanks to those crazy people on the "far right" who interceded
Thanks to the people on the " far right" who lied about it's prevelence so they could then pat themselves on the back as heros for interceding.
Posted on 4/21/23 at 10:44 am to texridder
quote:dang. All those words when you could have just proclaimed you severely labor under your clueless existence.
Thanks to the people on the " far right" who lied about it's prevelence so they could then pat themselves on the back as heros for interceding.
Posted on 4/21/23 at 10:46 am to FlexDawg
Curious as to why Democrats hate women. Any ideas?
Posted on 4/21/23 at 10:47 am to FlexDawg
Zero issue with preventing biological males from competing against females in athletic contests. That should be an obvious one but unfortunately it doesn’t seem to be.
Posted on 4/21/23 at 11:05 am to rhar61
quote:
It would work if Republicans would be reasonable about abortion and not go as far right as humanly possible like they are.
So women value responsibility free fricking with the option to murder their "accidents" above all else?
We are doomed, frick this country.
Even California law says it's murder if you kill a fetus...at ANY stage of development...before the woman walks through the door of the abortionist.
In 38 states...75%, including California...killing a fetus unlawfully is a homicide. Republicans need to do a better job of explaining how this gives the right to live to a fetus as a citizen, just like a newborn infant. Restrictive abortion laws are perfectly consistent with that.
This post was edited on 4/21/23 at 11:06 am
Posted on 4/21/23 at 11:07 am to FlexDawg
quote:
Send this to all of the emotion-based female voters you know
This message brought to you by the same people who lost their ever loving shite over beer cans.
Posted on 4/21/23 at 12:05 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
dang. All those words when you could have just proclaimed you severely labor under your clueless existence.
You post the stupidest shlt. And worthless too.
All you afraid to make a real post?
This post was edited on 4/21/23 at 12:08 pm
Posted on 4/21/23 at 12:08 pm to GoblinGuide
quote:
This message brought to you by the same people who lost their ever loving shite over beer cans.
Nah, its the same people who couldn't stand Bud Lite two weeks ago, now theyre singing the praises.
Posted on 4/21/23 at 1:04 pm to TigerAttorney
quote:USA has some of the most insanely loose abortion rules of any country besides like China and north Korea. Literally every'progressive" county in Europe has more restrictive abortion rules. Our rules are grotesque and in many places allow for the murder of fully viable babies for insane reasons.
would work if Republicans would be reasonable about abortion and not go as far right as humanly possible like they are.
This post was edited on 4/21/23 at 4:10 pm
Posted on 4/21/23 at 2:07 pm to tivey6301
quote:
I worked with a female about 10 years ago. She was firm in her belief that a woman should have the right to abort her baby right up until birth. She and I had many "spirited" conversations on the subject. One day the local news covered a young couple (under age 20) that were being charged with killing their 2 week old baby. My co-worker was outraged over the news story and the death of the poor child. I asked her "What changed in the 2 weeks it's been outside the womb that caused her to now think it was valuable?". She went into a profanity laced tirade, called me every name in the book and then stormed off. Never speaking to me again.
100% of the pro-abortion (prochoice is just a cover term) were not aborted. Hmmmm....
Posted on 4/21/23 at 11:35 pm to NineLineBind
quote:
Which was a reaction to the Democrats going as far left as humanly possible, i.e. late term abortions so late the baby was outside the womb.
How do you have an abortion so late that the baby was outside the womb? That wouldn't be an abortion, would it?
Stay off of fringe right websites so you don't make a fool of yourself.
Popular
Back to top

0







