- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 3/20/20 at 10:09 am to Lakeboy7
quote:
What in the fricking frick does JBE have to do with a Republican Senator insider trading? nothing. It only makes sense in your head.
Hey retard ,there was no insider trading. This board and the media are in a false panic.
Posted on 3/20/20 at 10:09 am to Sentrius
a private citizen would have liberty deprived over it.
She is lucky as this will only cost her an election. Kemp needs to distance himself from her.
She is lucky as this will only cost her an election. Kemp needs to distance himself from her.
Posted on 3/20/20 at 10:10 am to 93and99
you don't think someone in power would insider trade?
Posted on 3/20/20 at 10:10 am to Big4SALTbro
quote:My confidence in government f*cking this up was VERY VERY high regardless of knowing their "plans" or not.
you did not 100 percent know the gov. plan for it.
quote:K.
She 100 percent knows what is happening.
quote:By all means. This is the most outrageous thing they've done.
they should all be called out and ousted over it.
Posted on 3/20/20 at 10:11 am to Lakeboy7
quote:
but I'm sure she is conservative which makes it ok right?
quote:Here's the difference between you and several posters you're addressing. Richard Burr is dirty.
Lakeboy7
Posters here note that Richard Burr is dirty.
Richard Burr traded off of inside information.
Richard Burr is dirty.
He has admitted personally seeing to the transactions. This morning Burr claimed his decisions were predicated solely on "information about the virus" which he saw in the NYTimes and on CNBC. It is a ridiculous statement. He is also turning the matter over to his cronies in the Senate Ethics Committee. He is a POS.
Did you say the same regarding Harry Reid?
Hillary Clinton?
Nancy Pelosi?
Diane Feinstein?
If so, could you link those?
Meanwhile, the Loeffler case appears to me to be very different than Burr's.
Posted on 3/20/20 at 10:18 am to Lakeboy7
quote:
And you process everything through that ideological template in your head.
Imagine being so cynical and craven that you possess no ideology at all. Just sling shite to the wall and see what works.
I'm politically pragmatic but I'm not politically cynical and craven like you are.
quote:
What in the fricking frick does JBE have to do with a Republican Senator insider trading?
You mocked voters for liking republican politicians only if they're pro life.
I responded by saying that's literally the argument your boy used to get elected as a democrat in a red state.
I could swear I remember you pimping that argument at one point and if the TD search function didn't suck arse, I could find it.
Posted on 3/20/20 at 10:19 am to Taxing Authority
I never said it was the most outrages thing they have done. they are doing all kinds of outrages things right now raping liberty.
There are plenty of stones to throw and this is one of them.
She had access to information that others in the market did not. She is likely rich enough and smart enough to hide it pretty well. Its silly to deny that she had 100 percent knowledge of everything that was coming because we know she did.
There are plenty of stones to throw and this is one of them.
She had access to information that others in the market did not. She is likely rich enough and smart enough to hide it pretty well. Its silly to deny that she had 100 percent knowledge of everything that was coming because we know she did.
Posted on 3/20/20 at 10:19 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Here's the difference between you and several posters you're addressing. Richard Burr is dirty.
Posters here note that Richard Burr is dirty.
Richard Burr traded off of inside information.
The STOCK Act passed in 2012 with strong bipartisan support after 60 Minutes uncovered that lawmakers were using official information to profit in the markets. It was amended a year later to weaken those restrictions.
Burr voted AGAINST the STOCK Act. The final vote was 96-3.
At least he's consistent on this issue.
Posted on 3/20/20 at 10:20 am to NC_Tigah
its insanely bad optics for Loeffler. she knows that and doesn't really care.
Posted on 3/20/20 at 10:21 am to Lakeboy7
You’re hypocritical prog scum
Posted on 3/20/20 at 10:22 am to Big4SALTbro
quote:
you don't think someone in power would insider trade?
Am I getting arrested or charged for insider trading because I pay attention and moved money before the crash ?
These people in all likelihood have Stockbrokers who oversee their accounts. Nothing will happen.
Posted on 3/20/20 at 10:22 am to Big4SALTbro
quote:Correct.
you made your trades off the trade winds, reading what was going on that anyone in market could also read.
quote:Correct.
Kelly operates on a different plain she has intel that none of us would have for days or weeks, maybe even ever.
quote:Happens all the time!
She claims the trust is blind and she doesn't communicate with her broker, but come on you don't have that much money and just leave it up to chance that the best and brightest will do right by you.
As I've said several times, the odds that Loeffler had one damn thing to do with her portfolio is about the same as the chance Melania makes national defense decisions for President Trump. Roughly zero.
Given their relative backgrounds, Loeffler's husband would make 100% of those calls .... if they were made. My bet is, her husband's position as NYSE Chairman would force them both to keep their money in a blind trust. I don't know that for a fact. But I'd be stunned if it were not the case.
Meanwhile, her account transactions are explainable exclusive of insider information.
Posted on 3/20/20 at 10:24 am to Sentrius
quote:
She has a very small window to provide a reasonable, air tight and credible explanation for these shady and suspicious transactions.
No, no she doesn't. With everyone's focus elsewhere there could literally be a video of her walking out of the briefing, calling her broker and yelling "sell everything" and nothing would happen to her.
Posted on 3/20/20 at 10:27 am to 93and99
that wasn't what was asked.
you do not have insider information. a shrewd trader watches the trends, pulls from information that everyone has.
Congress as a inside track on the every day citizen.
Sure she has a broker that does that, she isn't a day trader. However, if I have a 3rd part trading for me and I was to have some stock and a client came in and told me some information that was confidential and I then was to tip off my broker id be in deep shite. Not congress though
you do not have insider information. a shrewd trader watches the trends, pulls from information that everyone has.
Congress as a inside track on the every day citizen.
Sure she has a broker that does that, she isn't a day trader. However, if I have a 3rd part trading for me and I was to have some stock and a client came in and told me some information that was confidential and I then was to tip off my broker id be in deep shite. Not congress though
Posted on 3/20/20 at 10:28 am to Sentrius
quote:
do not make investment decisions for my portfolio. Investment decisions are made by multiple third-party advisors without my or my husband's knowledge or involvement.
If this is true she’s a fricking idiot and I’d bet my life she votes on legislation in the exact same way, I bet this statement is also true:
I do not make voting decisions for legislation. My voting decisions are made by multiple third-party advisors and donors without my knowledge or involvement.
Posted on 3/20/20 at 10:30 am to Big4SALTbro
quote:
She thinks all the peasants are retarded if they believe she has no communication with her broker.
I don’t believe her at all, but if it was in an advisory account it is 100% possible
Posted on 3/20/20 at 10:30 am to Big4SALTbro
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/4/21 at 5:44 am
Posted on 3/20/20 at 10:31 am to NC_Tigah
wait you really believe they don't have any clue where their money is until they receive a 1099 at the end of the year?
they know exactly where it all is, you don't make that much money by depending on others to make the right decision for you.
I do know that it will likely be 100 percent impossible to prove what they did, they aren't dumb. It is insanely bad optics for her and it likely will cost her election. she was already shaky and now this.
The best investment firms still have misses. However, she has the information to prevent misses. its not far fetched to believe that she tipped off someone.
they know exactly where it all is, you don't make that much money by depending on others to make the right decision for you.
I do know that it will likely be 100 percent impossible to prove what they did, they aren't dumb. It is insanely bad optics for her and it likely will cost her election. she was already shaky and now this.
The best investment firms still have misses. However, she has the information to prevent misses. its not far fetched to believe that she tipped off someone.
Posted on 3/20/20 at 10:32 am to Big4SALTbro
quote:
Some people can't stop rooting for muh political team
If the insider trading is true, it should be disqualifying, but it never actually matters.
Once November rolls around, GOP voters are much more likely to pull the switch and vote for Burr and Loeffler as long as they agree with their stance on abortion and gun rights. And Dems will vote for Feinstein as long as the R candidate is pro life and against the Green New Deal.
The only way this ever comes up is in a primary challenge, and those aren’t that common. Collins is the only reason this could matter for Loeffler
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News