- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Second Shooter Theory
Posted on 7/18/24 at 4:33 pm to LegalEazyE
Posted on 7/18/24 at 4:33 pm to LegalEazyE
quote:
"That's just right wing conspiracy theory...." - SFP with his usual fig bullshite.
He's attacking the "right wing conspiracy", not me.
I'm just pointing it out.
Posted on 7/18/24 at 4:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I speak truthful, not as a liar. Thanks for your response.
You're almost always full of shite.
Posted on 7/18/24 at 4:35 pm to LegalEazyE
quote:
You're almost always full of shite.

Posted on 7/18/24 at 4:36 pm to SoFlaGuy
I’ll tell you what the second shooter theory is. It’s that every time a would-be assassin shoots at someone important, loons are going to say there was a second shooter.
Posted on 7/18/24 at 4:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Only bad lawyers don't understand how bad eyewitness testimony is
I'm a lawyer with years of criminal defense under my belt and to imply all eyewitness testimony is bad... as an attorney... is fricking amazing.
Posted on 7/18/24 at 4:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
You might want to look up the word theory in one of those old fashioned dictionary books.
Posted on 7/18/24 at 4:44 pm to LegalEazyE
quote:
and to imply all eyewitness testimony is bad... as an attorney... is fricking amazing
Quote me where I said "all"
Of course there are exceptions and outlier scenarios.
There is a ton of academic work on this subject. You should study up on it.
Posted on 7/18/24 at 4:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
and to imply all eyewitness testimony is bad... as an attorney... is fricking amazing
Quote me where I said "all"
Of course there are exceptions and outlier scenarios.
There is a ton of academic work on this subject. You should study up on it.
I'm quite aware and I know there is bad and good eyewitness testimony, chief. But when you basically dismissed ALL eyewitness testimony and accounts of a guy on the water tower and shots coming from different directions because some eyewitness testimony is bad in certain instances... that's pretty fricking amazing.
Posted on 7/18/24 at 4:57 pm to LegalEazyE
quote:
But when you basically dismissed ALL eyewitness testimony and accounts of a guy on the water tower and shots coming from different directions
Weapons make eyewitness testimony even less reliable.
If you have actually studied this, you'd know it. There is even a term for it (Weapon Focus).
That's why pretty much every major shooting event has people declaring they saw alternate shooters
This was a big one for Sandy Hook
Parkland had one too, but it seems to be scrubbed from google
Posted on 7/18/24 at 4:59 pm to Penrod
quote:
I’ll tell you what the second shooter theory is. It’s that every time a would-be assassin shoots at someone important, loons are going to say there was a second shoote
What loons? The "loons" that were there and said they had bullets whizzing by them in different directions and there was a gunman on the water tower as well as the roof? They were saying it directly after the incident happened. Then the media had the one confirmed shooter because he was dead on the rooftop. All the focus shifted to him and rooftop. To act like there is nothing to the second shooter theory/question at all and it's just absolute wild, paranoid right wing conspiracy theory is wild.
Posted on 7/18/24 at 5:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
you have actually studied this, you'd know it. There is even a term for it (Weapon Focus).
I think you missed your calling as a college professor. Minimal real world experience, well read, and ego bigger than Dallas.
Posted on 7/18/24 at 5:05 pm to LegalEazyE
Posted on 7/18/24 at 5:07 pm to patnuh
quote:
Minimal real world experience
Wait what
Posted on 7/18/24 at 5:08 pm to LegalEazyE
quote:Yes, those loons. Eyewitnesses are unreliable.
What loons? The "loons" that were there and said they had bullets whizzing by them in different directions and there was a gunman on the water tower as well as the roof?
Posted on 7/19/24 at 1:44 pm to SoFlaGuy
https://x.com/TonySeruga/status/1814294910339895401
https://x.com/tonyseruga
Opens profile photo
Tony Seruga
@TonySeruga
Investor | Board Member | Big Data Pioneer | Intel Ops | CIA/NSA Contractor/Whistleblower | CRE | Philanthropist | Healthcare M&A @ Greenlaw
39 year intelligence agent
quote:
Tony Seruga @TonySeruga
We have tracked the black SUV that had picked up our phantom water tower sniper that escaped using a zip line via the backside of the water tower into the trees and then on foot a short jaunt to Meridian Road. With 100% confidence, based on cell phone data, that particular sniper was FBI and the SUV was registered to the Department of Agriculture.
https://x.com/tonyseruga
Opens profile photo
Tony Seruga
@TonySeruga
Investor | Board Member | Big Data Pioneer | Intel Ops | CIA/NSA Contractor/Whistleblower | CRE | Philanthropist | Healthcare M&A @ Greenlaw
39 year intelligence agent
This post was edited on 7/19/24 at 1:48 pm
Posted on 7/19/24 at 1:51 pm to Kjnstkmn
everyone on here told me nobody was on the tower. can't be.
Posted on 7/19/24 at 2:16 pm to SoFlaGuy
This would take too many people being involved to orchestrate this whole thing. Its much more believable that 5-10 government DEI hires and some Barney Fife local cops failed to do their jobs, than that all these multiple snipers and agents were in on an elaborate scheme but trusting it all to some dungeons and dragons kid to pull the trigger and not spill the beans before or after it all goes down.
The only organized part to this was the Biden administrationg intentionally skimping on Trump's protection detail, at the same time they and the media make him out to be "literally Hitler" and a 'threat to democracy"....and let nature take its course. Then they have plausible deniability, but its obviously what they hoped would happen.
The only organized part to this was the Biden administrationg intentionally skimping on Trump's protection detail, at the same time they and the media make him out to be "literally Hitler" and a 'threat to democracy"....and let nature take its course. Then they have plausible deniability, but its obviously what they hoped would happen.
This post was edited on 7/19/24 at 2:19 pm
Posted on 7/19/24 at 9:01 pm to Kjnstkmn
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Twitter Link
Twitter Link
Twitter Link
This post was edited on 7/19/24 at 9:33 pm
Posted on 7/19/24 at 9:12 pm to Kjnstkmn
He’s wrong about the math adding up to water tower, the more likely meaning is the window of the 2nd story building that was behind crooks and to crooks right (facing Trump). The water tower shot I think is closer to 260-265 yds, crooks being 155 ish.
This post was edited on 7/19/24 at 9:15 pm
Popular
Back to top


0






