- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Sean Davis is on it!! He's not letting Roberts release go
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:13 am
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:13 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This post was edited on 3/19/25 at 10:14 am
5
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:14 am to BCreed1
quote:
John Roberts didn’t just go out of his way yesterday to trash Trump on a purely political matter—impeachment of corrupt judges—over which Roberts has no authority.
He did it by selectively leaking his statement to left-wing corporate media outlets, lying about its nature (claiming it was only in response to press inquiries rather than a general statement), and then refusing to provide the full statement to conservative media outlets when requested, including
@FDRLST
.
To date, no one knows the full extent of what Roberts and his taxpayer-funded PR agents have said, because no record of any statement from the court can be found anywhere on the Supreme Court website, a shocking breach of protocol and transparency.
Did the left-wing corporate media outlets hand-picked by Roberts to receive his political rant print it in full, or did they selectively quote it? It is impossible to know, because the Chief Justice is refusing to be transparent about what he said and who he said it to.
I have now asked the Supreme Court public information office five separate times to be provided a copy of Roberts’ full statement. I was hung up on twice, rudely told to send an email by someone who thought that was easier than just answering why the statement wasn’t on the Supreme Court’s website, and have sent multiple e-mail inquiries that have been ignored by government employees whose sole job is to respond to media inquiries.
Do these sound like the actions of an impartial jurist doing his best to defend the Constitution and the rule of law? Or does that sound like something a nakedly political partisan activist would do?
You would think an institution that nearly got two of its own members killed after a leak of its deliberations would go to great leaks to make sure all statements and records of the Court would be transparently provided to everyone at the same time, as opposed to leaking statements—and comments about them from Supreme Court PIO staff—to select news outlets for the purpose of politically shaping coverage.
You would think that, but you’d be wrong. We have known for more than a decade that John Roberts is a political schemer, not an impartial jurist. His latest anti-Trump rant—and his refusal to be honest and transparent about it—only makes his gamesmanship more obvious, and more dangerous to the legitimacy of the Supreme Court.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:16 am to BCreed1
It's unbelievable that Roberts felt compelled to respond to Trump's social media post. 
So much for being nonpartisan and apolitical.
So much for being nonpartisan and apolitical.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:17 am to GumboPot
John Roberts is a stain upon the SCOTUS.
This post was edited on 3/19/25 at 10:19 am
Posted on 3/19/25 at 10:19 am to GumboPot
Per his pr people... He was asked a question. We don't know the full extent of his answer nor the question.
He has created an issue and the only way to solve it is to start by releasing the question and the complete answer.
He has created an issue and the only way to solve it is to start by releasing the question and the complete answer.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:31 am to GumboPot
Balls of Roberts considering his name seems to be among the flights on Lolita Express
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:30 pm to Nosevens
There was actually a picture of this bum wading in the waters surrounding Epstein's Pedo Fortress.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:35 pm to BCreed1
Does the office of Chief Justice require impeachment for demotion to Associate Justice? The fact that it is ratified by the Senate suggests that it does but is that explicit in the Constitution?
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:42 pm to tommyga
quote:
There was actually a picture of this bum wading in the waters surrounding Epstein's Pedo Fortress.
One Carribbean beach looks much like another. His name appeared on the flight logs but there are a lot John Roberts in the world. And back in the day no one gave a frick if you used a fake name on a private flight log. That may have been tightened since then but I have personally flown to the Bahamas with "Bill Clinton", "Mick Jagger", and "Ron Jeremy". And yes, a good time was had by all.
This post was edited on 3/19/25 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:44 pm to GumboPot
Roberts liked being invited to all the democratic parties and events.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:45 pm to BCreed1
quote:His answer to all such questions should be "No comment" 100% of the time.
He was asked a question
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:48 pm to BCreed1
Like a dog with a bone. I love it.
Roberts' career won't survive his going out on a limb for Boasberg.
Roberts' career won't survive his going out on a limb for Boasberg.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:49 pm to CrotchetyCowboy
quote:
Roberts liked being invited to all the democratic parties and events.
This. His Beltway cocktail party circuit is much more important to him than his role as Chief Justice.
Should Roberts be forced to resign, due to his gross misconduct, I say Ted Cruz get the nod for new Chief Justice.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:49 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Roberts' career won't survive his going out on a limb for Boasberg.
I believe that Vox. He is either going to have to correct himself or clean up HIS mess.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:53 pm to BCreed1
quote:
He is either going to have to correct himself or clean up HIS mess.
As usual, Karma Patriot is over the target. She's one of the best out there.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
President
@realDonaldTrump
saved the #TRUMPCARD for SCOTUS.
He’s forcing their hand in the most public way possible — knowing that, in doing so, they must now take action, as the Supreme Court, to rein in the district courts who have stepped out of their Constitutional lane & led us to the brink of a Constitutional Crisis.
SCOTUS is the appellate court that SHOULD have shut this down.
In order for the Judicial Branch to maintain any creditably, Trump & Roberts BOTH know the Supreme Court MUST INTERVENE to remove the activist judges & overturn their decisions quickly ……bc once the Executive & Legislative Branches start acting against them, the legitimacy of the federal Judicial Branch will be lost forever.
Trump card played beautifully.
Tick tock. ??
This post was edited on 3/19/25 at 1:56 pm
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:55 pm to shinerfan
quote:
Does the office of Chief Justice require impeachment for demotion to Associate Justice?
There is no process of demotion at all.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:55 pm to GumboPot
quote:
It's unbelievable that Roberts felt compelled to respond to Trump's social media post.
His statement was boilerplate. You’re massively buying into intentional overreaction.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 2:01 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Should Roberts be forced to resign, due to his gross misconduct, I say Ted Cruz get the nod for new Chief Justice.
Agreed. As long as Texas doesn’t put in someone like Crockett or bedo to replace him in the senate
Posted on 3/19/25 at 2:03 pm to GumboPot
quote:
It's unbelievable that Roberts felt compelled to respond to Trump's social media post.
The bigger problem is Roberts and ACB seem to be 2 peas in a pod.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 3/19/25 at 2:03 pm to Wally Sparks
quote:
There is no process of demotion at all.
You're probably right, especially since it would be decided by the Supremes themselves.But is CJ explicitly a lifetime appointment or is that simply tradition?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News