1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS says taxpayers have to continue to pay for tranny prisoner treatments
Posted on 10/21/26 at 1:57 pm to TenWheelsForJesus
Posted on 10/21/26 at 1:57 pm to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
We follow laws to build the society we want to live in. You seem to think we follow laws for the sake of laws.
No. This particular law is important.
Again, this is how Biden's Student Loan forgiveness and vax mandates were thwarted.
These laws prevent government from engaging in irrational policymaking immediately, especially flowing from a single person. Using history and common sense, we know that form of government and autocracy is bad.
quote:
When the law doesn't give us a better society, it is right to ignore it.
So Biden's admin was just in enforcing the vax mandate? Student loan forgiveness? Because it's OK for them to ignore the law?
Posted on 10/21/26 at 1:57 pm to udtiger
Its a ruling on process and not the merits of the issue.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 1:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
No I’m suggesting that the implementation was because merits were ignored by a judge who considered to avoid actual law but used the cultural context over scientific knowledge
Posted on 10/21/26 at 2:02 pm to Nosevens
quote:
I’m suggesting that the implementation was because merits were ignored by a judge
That's specifically not how you analyze proper APA implementation.
quote:
but used the cultural context over scientific knowledge
The ruling ignored the "cultural context" and used science and other evidence, instead
Again:
quote:
In June, a federal judge said that he "has no intention of wading into the culture war begin waged against transgender individuals." Instead, Judge Royce Lamberth in Washington, D.C., said he was "simply" deciding whether the government followed the correct procedures for issuing new rules – and that it had not.
For example, Lamberth said the Bureau of Prisons cited no evidence that providing gender-affirming care – which the government has done for years – was ineffective for the inmates or posed security risks for the prisons.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 2:04 pm to udtiger
So predictable
Posted on 10/21/26 at 2:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
What laws are you OK with ignoring, exactly?
What law says that I'm responsible for another person's sex change that's in prison?
Posted on 10/21/26 at 2:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Is the underlying ruling still lawfare?
Your feigned ignorance has grown tiresome.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 2:15 pm to Lg
quote:
What law says that I'm responsible for another person's sex change that's in prison?
The bureau of prisons policy that the Trump admin screwed up in trying to change
This post was edited on 10/21/26 at 2:16 pm
Posted on 10/21/26 at 2:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
policy
Is now "law"?
Posted on 10/21/26 at 2:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This particular law is important.
Which law?
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News