- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/11/25 at 1:00 pm to LegendInMyMind
wikipedia (yeah I know)
yeah, I know, wikipedia can mean anything or nothing.
I would be delighted if the president can chop off the bureaucratic state at its knees.
I'm searching the internet for "official" confirmation of the OP's tweet.
quote:
Humphrey's Executor received criticism from some justices during the latter part of the 20th century, claiming it limits the powers of the executive branch, and under the John Roberts court in the early 21st century, has been limited through various decisions. The decision has been challenged by the second Donald Trump presidency, with Trump having removed several agency commissioners . The Roberts court has stayed lower court rulings that found these firings illegal under Humphrey's Executor, and has agreed to hear a case directly challenging the decision in December 2025.
yeah, I know, wikipedia can mean anything or nothing.
I would be delighted if the president can chop off the bureaucratic state at its knees.
I'm searching the internet for "official" confirmation of the OP's tweet.
Posted on 10/11/25 at 1:02 pm to Mellow Drama
The opinion came out in April. It randomly reappears here every few months as if it was breaking news. But it is a real ruling and I have no issues with revisiting great wins under Trump 47.
Posted on 10/11/25 at 1:02 pm to Mellow Drama
quote:
I'm searching the internet for "official" confirmation of the OP's tweet.
Your bolded sentence refers to the stay issued by USSC back in July.
Posted on 10/11/25 at 1:04 pm to Riverside
quote:Even after showing hard facts from the last 50 years or so.
The Qatari airbase thread really was a parade of TDS.
Posted on 10/11/25 at 1:05 pm to Riverside
quote:
But it is a real ruling
Real? Yes
Reflective of the words in OP? frick no
Posted on 10/11/25 at 1:05 pm to Jbird
They were convinced that Trump had given Qatar an airbase on American soil because of the donated, used jet they gave us. Their minds are broken beyond repair.
Posted on 10/11/25 at 1:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Reflective of the words in OP?
The words in the Xweet that the OP shared have been copy/pasted and shared in full by numerous random "news" accounts over recent weeks and months. It has been an interesting follow.
Posted on 10/11/25 at 1:09 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
The words in the Xweet that the OP shared have been copy/pasted and shared in full by numerous random "news" accounts over recent weeks and months. It has been an interesting follow.
Posted on 10/11/25 at 1:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
Fair. It has precedential value but it’s still just a ruling lifting a stay. The Lisa Cook case will be more interesting in my opinion. If Trump can fire a Fed Reserve Board governor for cause, then the standard is much lower for these lower executive branch agencies.
Posted on 10/11/25 at 1:11 pm to Riverside
I think they're going to combine the 2 into 1 ruling
Posted on 10/11/25 at 1:11 pm to Riverside
quote:My dipshit cousin is still wailing that we should be rioting in the streets over this.
They were convinced that Trump had given Qatar an airbase on American soil because of the donated, used jet they gave us. Their minds are broken beyond repair.
Posted on 10/11/25 at 2:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Stripping Congress of power does the country very little good.
Creating organizations that are not answerable to the Executive is way worse
Posted on 10/11/25 at 2:53 pm to Placekicker
The twitter author reads like a grifter.
I bet it couldn’t name a single ‘they’ boogeyman.
I bet it couldn’t name a single ‘they’ boogeyman.
Posted on 10/11/25 at 3:10 pm to Placekicker
quote:
The 6-3 decision
The same three fricktards ALWAYS vote against the US Constitution. There is no defense to the argument that these are political activists as opposed to constitutional scholars.
Those three need to immediately be replaced by Victor Davis Hansen, Ted Cruz and Jesse Lee Peterson.
Posted on 10/11/25 at 3:11 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
Creating organizations that are not answerable to the Executive is way worse
Why? They're "answerable" to Congress, who is much more of a representative of the people than the President.
Our system is built to reject consolidated control like the "Unified Executive" theory Trump's admin keeps pushing.
You can call your Congressman. You can't call the President.
Posted on 10/11/25 at 3:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Congress, who is much more of a representative of the people than the President
Outright lie
Again
Posted on 10/11/25 at 3:21 pm to Padme
quote:
Outright lie
This is basic civics. I see you ignored the remainder of the post.
Congress represents the people. That's the whole function of the body.
Posted on 10/11/25 at 3:29 pm to BurlesonCountyAg
Hahahahahahah
Posted on 10/11/25 at 3:38 pm to Placekicker
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News