SCOTUS Brunson v. Adams hearing. 2020 election in front of the SCOTUS Jan 6th 2023

quote:

---

The Brunson Petition for a Writ of Certiorari would require the votes of only four Justices to move the case forward.

---

I wonder if John Roberts will have another screaming fit behind closed doors?

what are you talking about? Congress doesn’t control state elections. Their only duty was to confirm the properly certified slate of electors was in front of them to count.

quote:

---

what are you talking about? Congress doesn’t control state elections. Their only duty was to confirm the properly certified slate of electors was in front of them to count.

---

When the results of the 1876 presidential election were in doubt, Congress created a special Electoral Commission made up of five House members, five Senators, and five Supreme Court Justices to investigate.


The

More

You

Know.

quote:

---

When the results of the 1876 presidential election were in doubt, Congress created a special Electoral Commission made up of five House members, five Senators, and five Supreme Court Justices to investigate. The More You Know.

---

Gee if only the Electoral Count Act of 1887 hadn’t been enacted, you’d have something here.

quote:

---

Gee if only

---

Does not and did not change anything in this topic.

quote:

---

Does not and did not change anything in this topic.

---

You tried to argue that Congress had a more consequential role is investigating elections than is actually the case. And this topic is thread kinda meaningless to begin with tbh

quote:

---

DNI’s own conclusion that the People’s Republic of China had interfered to influence the outcome of the presidential election

---

It is a nearly insurmountable mountain to scale considering the way BIDEN's DNI shaded the final report. It was delivered to Potatobrain in March 2021.

quote:

---

Key Judgment 4: We assess that China did not deploy interference efforts and considered but did not deploy influence efforts intended to change the outcome of the US Presidential election. We have high confidence in this judgment. China sought stability in its relationship with the United States, did not view either election outcome as being advantageous enough for China to risk getting caught meddling, and assessed its traditional influence tools — primarily targeted economic measures and lobbying — would be sufficient to meet its goal of shaping US China policy regardless of the winner.

---

In striking contrast, but basically buried in the report is this.

quote:

---

The NIO for Cyber assesses, however, that China did take some steps to try to undermine
former President Trump’s reelection.

---

Also this statement in the report is a beauty:

quote:

---

We have no indications that any foreign actor attempted to interfere in the 2020 US elections by altering any technical aspect of the voting process, including voter registration, ballot casting, vote tabulation, or reporting results.

---

The Konnech criminal case kind of blows that assert straight to hell. Nonetheless, the report conclusions are antithetical to Tim Canova's assertions.

it is now clear that the totality of the conspiracy to steal (unconstitutionally interfere with) the 2020 election (and the 2022 election) cannot be denied.

Departments of the federal government conspired with major elements of the "Journalism" and "communication" and "financial" organizations in the private sector to disallow and prevent normal debate of issues in the public square.

Instead, departments of federal and state governments actively withheld evidence of this conspiracy, conducted targeted activity to promote allegations known by them to be false, either due to actual evidence they had in their possession or by knowingly manufacturing the elements of the known false allegations.

Taken together, the conduct of the 2020 election cycle throughout its life cycle was deliberately rendered moot by felonious and unconstitutional activity of elements within the federal and state government agencies.

This is sufficient to demolish any argument attempting to certify that the 2020 and 2022 elections were held under constitutionally allowed conditions.

The only redress is to remove all officers selected in those two unconstitutional activities and return to the officials who held those offices prior to the fraudulent election and to declare a constitutional emergency that prevents any legislation or executive function that is not directly declared to be a national security situation and immediately conduce a new election - without any campaign activity - supervised by the legitimate officials of the states - where only certified citizens who can produce authentic identification on the day of the election, - and conducted with paper ballots. All supervised by the SCOTUS.

Nothing other than emergency medical and law enforcement activities wrt to physical violence shall be permitted until newly elected officials are inaugurated.

Have yall looked up this case and the people bringing it? It's amateur hour. There should be no confidence that this case moves forward.

It's 4 brothers - 1 of which they have to point out was too busy with his A/V company to participate. One brother "has plenty of legal experience suing banks and has gotten 2 petitions to the SC - albeit both were tossed out". These are not lawyers and they are representing themselves.

Of course, like always, their website asks for donations right at the top...

LINK

Please don't get your hopes up for this.