- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS Arguments On Men in Women's Sports
Posted on 1/13/26 at 1:10 pm to CU_Tigers4life
Posted on 1/13/26 at 1:10 pm to CU_Tigers4life
0
Posted on 1/13/26 at 1:15 pm to CU_Tigers4life
SCOTUS arguments on the validity of transgenders in sports is absurd.
Men have penis, women have vagina. Keep the pensises out of women's sports.
Men have penis, women have vagina. Keep the pensises out of women's sports.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 1:16 pm to Hangit
I would make them define every word like cisgender or transgender in court. Not just say the word, but literally define it. Maybe if they hear it out loud enough times they will see how ridiculous this whole thing has become.
"Your honor, the transgender I am representing is seeking the right to play in boys sports."
Your honor, the girl that identifies as a boy I am representing is seeking the right to play in boys sports"
I mean come on
"Your honor, the transgender I am representing is seeking the right to play in boys sports."
Your honor, the girl that identifies as a boy I am representing is seeking the right to play in boys sports"
I mean come on
Posted on 1/13/26 at 1:18 pm to Bigdawgb
quote:I have always thought that comparison of the two procedures is a bit silly.
Female genital mutilation is performed on young girls & is banned in almost every country. Circumcision is performed on young boys & is very common globally.
I wonder how she would explain that in context of her other statements
Male circumcision removes only the foreskin. The female equivalent would be removal of all or part of the clitoral hood.
But the most-common versions of female "circumcision" involve removal of the entire external structure of the clitoris. The male equivalent would be removal of the entire external structure of the penis.
Not really comparable at all.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 1:53 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
Trans is a mental illness in the people who are Trans and those who support them.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 2:10 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
I have always thought that comparison of the two procedures is a bit silly.
That specific part of the procedure isn't a great comparison. Other parts are an excellent comparison though.
Both procedures change the genitals irreversibly. Both are typically performed on individuals too young to consent or even understand what's happening. THAT'S the comparison I'm making.
Edit: Even removal of the clitoral hood is banned by federal law so this chick is a moron
This post was edited on 1/13/26 at 2:12 pm
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News