Started By
Message

re: Science is debunking itself again

Posted on 9/20/23 at 12:51 pm to
Posted by MAADFACTS
Member since Jul 2021
1410 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 12:51 pm to
I believe in God and that science has revealed much about both the workings of the universe and the way that life has developed and flourished here on earth, including human life. I will never understand how so many supposedly sincere believers want to reduce God to an unsolved X in an equation and don’t think that’s taking His name in vain
This post was edited on 9/20/23 at 12:52 pm
Posted by BayouBlitz
Member since Aug 2007
18126 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

When followed completely, all roads of scientific thought lead to a dead-end at some point where a true scientist MUST accept the only logical answer is: GOD.


Lol. I say it's true so it must be true. Right.

quote:

sumtimeitbeslikedat


Sumtimesitdont
Posted by ThinePreparedAni
In a sea of cognitive dissonance
Member since Mar 2013
11315 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 12:54 pm to


Posted by ThuperThumpin
Member since Dec 2013
9044 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

I will never understand how so many supposedly sincere believers want to reduce God to an unsolved X in an equation and don’t think that’s taking His name in vain


Good point. Perhaps they lack faith.
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
24919 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

You realize Big Bang was first theorized by a priest right?


This is not a secret, people know this

Does being a priest have relevance to make it more or less believable?
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
24919 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

I never said a word of that. Why am I being quoted?


titmouse does not understand how the Internet works
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
33359 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

Oh? Link? (or should I say Missing Link?)

This is the first time we can detect the actual signal of Neanderthal ancestry in Africans,” said Lu Chen, a postdoctoral research associate at Princeton’s Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics (LSI) and a co-author of a new paper that published Thursday in the journal Cell.

Joshua Akey, a professor at LSI who led the study, suggested their findings cast doubt on the widely held “out of Africa” theory of human migration

This ancient group of Europeans then migrated into Africa, introducing Neanderthal ancestry to African populations.
quote:

Survival of the fittest is not evolutionary, it is the driver of evolution.

New Scientist: By itself, survival of the fittest is a dead end. People are especially guilty of confusing survival of the fittest with evolution.

What’s more, although the phrase conjures up an image of a violent struggle for survival, in reality the word “fittest” seldom entails evolution. On the contrary, it can mean anything from the best camouflaged or the most fecund to the cleverest or the most cooperative. Cooperation is an incredibly successful survival strategy.
quote:

quote:

DNA changes are not random

DNA mutations are

Nature: Why mutation is not as random as we thought. Challenging the dogma of gene evolution. However, new research is challenging this idea of randomness, showing that mutations in the genome of the plant Arabidosis thaliana appear to happen less frequently in important regions of the genome.
quote:

DNA similarity between chimps and humans has dropped from 98.5% to 81%

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: Greater Than 98% Chimp/Human DNA Similarity? Not Any More.

David A. DeWitt cited a study which found that the two species are only 95% identical when insertions and deletions are considered, showing that the estimate of divergence depends mainly on what type of DNA is being compared. A number of differences between humans and chimps were named that are difficult to quantify in an estimate of sequence divergence, including shorter telomeres in humans, a 10% larger chimp genome, and great differences in chromosomes 4, 9, 12 and the Y chromosome, for example. Indeed, DNA similarity estimates ‘do not adequately represent fine changes in genome organization.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences confirm in a study, nearly one-half of the MHC region was sequenced, ‘which to date represents the longest continuous sequence within this species [chimps], our closest evolutionary relative’, and has been described as a ‘rapidly evolving’ part of the genome. Although it has been held that human/chimp similarity in the MHC is ‘so great that the alleles must have originated before the supposed chimp/human evolutionary divergence’, the sequence results actually dropped the DNA similarity estimate down to 86.7%
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
24919 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

Why? Which god?


Not really sure that even matters. Just a belief in, we are not it and there is something bigger pulling the strings. Everything we are and know, just did not happen from a random explosion of matter the size of a pin head.
Posted by titmouse
a tree branch above your car
Member since May 2006
6616 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

Does being a priest have relevance to make it more or less believable?


More believable in that big bang and Aquinas's cosmological arguments for God's existence must not be in conflict if you have a priest of all people propose it? Absolutely.
Posted by ThuperThumpin
Member since Dec 2013
9044 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

Not really sure that even matters. Just a belief in, we are not it and there is something bigger pulling the strings. Everything we are and know, just did not happen from a random explosion of matter the size of a pin head.


So turtles all the way down right?
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
26924 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

So turtles all the way down right?



Do you really think joking about turtles dispenses with a first cause? Or is it a defense mechanism?
Posted by ThuperThumpin
Member since Dec 2013
9044 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

Do you really think joking about turtles dispenses with a first cause? Or is it a defense mechanism?


Defense mechanism in a way if I'am being honest. The concept of the prime mover glitches my brain.
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
33359 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

I see someone gets his science updates off the side of a bus.

Imagine living through this major of a divergence during a single lifetime. Idiot is 100% wrong, but if this data were actually true, idiot would essentially be proving evolution.

Try to keep up with the science

Or keep looking like a doofus. I dont really care
quote:

Researchers have learned that despite the similarity between the DNA of humans and our closest relative, the chimpanzee, a significant difference occurs in the places along the genome where gene swapping occurs.

Researchers from the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard report with colleagues that the locations of DNA swapping between chromosomes, known as recombination "hotspots," are nearly entirely different. "We started trying to compare recombination in humans and chimpanzees in the hope that better understanding this fundamental mechanism might inform our approach to mapping genes for human diseases, but our progress was stymied because identifying hotspots was laborious and inefficient," said co-senior author Dr. David Altshuler, director of the Broad's program in Medical and Population Genetics and associate professor of genetics and of medicine at Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School.

Recombination--or the swapping of genes between chromosomes--shapes the patterns of genetic variation in a species. It is the process in which DNA from an individual's father and mother is reshuffled to create new combinations of genes in the child--new combinations on which natural selection can act to shape the evolution of the species.

quote:

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that confirms this statement. In the study, nearly one-half of the MHC (major histocompatibility complex) region was sequenced, ‘which to date represents the longest continuous sequence within this species [chimps], our closest evolutionary relative’, and has been described as a ‘rapidly evolving’ part of the genome. Although it has been held that human/chimp similarity in the MHC is ‘so great that the alleles must have originated before the supposed chimp/human evolutionary divergence’, the sequence results actually dropped the DNA similarity estimate down to 86.7%

quote:

The human genome contains two MHC Class I genes, the MICA and MICB, yet chimpanzees contain only one gene at this location, the Patr-MIC.

NOTE: Dr. Rodney Page, professor of medical oncology and director of the Flint Animal Cancer Center. "Humans and dogs are 95 percent identical genetically"
Posted by tarzana
TX Hwy 6-- the Brazos River Valley
Member since Sep 2015
30676 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

Still no fossil evidence of human evolution

There's ample fossil evidence of human evolution over the millennia. Humans of today don't look like their ancestors of 4,000,000 years ago, like Ardipithecus ("Lucy" as an example).
Posted by BayouBlitz
Member since Aug 2007
18126 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

random explosion of matter the size of a pin head.


Jesus. You got that all completely wrong.
Posted by BayouBlitz
Member since Aug 2007
18126 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 3:13 pm to
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
62433 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

I will never understand how so many supposedly sincere believers want to reduce God to an unsolved X in an equation and don’t think that’s taking His name in vain


This is ridiculous.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
62433 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

There is no evidence of evolution as the origin of our species. It's done. Over.



Oh boy.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
80018 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 3:29 pm to
Gotcha.

I'm swayed by the mathematical odds myself.

Put side by side the odds favor simulation over evolution. Math is one of the more objective and reliable of the science so it seems reasonable.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
86426 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

You think evolution will be “debunked”?


Already has been.
It absolutely has not.
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 35
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 35Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram