re: Science is debunking itself again

quote:

---

Life does not work that way.

---

But it does.
You don't believe horses, zebras, and donkeys originated from a common ancestor?

Dogs and wolves?

Lions and tigers?

Darwin's finches?

quote:

---

You don't believe horses, zebras, and donkeys originated from a common ancestor? Dogs and wolves?

---

Of course dogs came from wolves as we domesticated and intentionally bred them.

I still cannot get a rational explanation as to the birth of a man in an ape family where they would have nurtured and raised that child to adulthood and then allowed that difference to procreate with one of theirs . Over and over and over.

Nature does not work that way. That is like saying homosexuality is a part of nature - it isn't.

quote:

---

Nature does not work that way.

---

You're going to break things in their minds with statements like that. They only have a few sturdy brain connections.

quote:

---

Big Bang theory does not claim everything came from nothing

---

All matter to ever exist came from a singular point. They don't have the slightest reason to believe that except that they suspect everything seems to be moving away from a point. But they don't really know any of that. Speculation

quote:

---

It is religious creation myth “Ex Nihilo” where a magic superhuman in the sky creates everything from nothing

---

First of all, it's not magic. Second, God isn't human by any stretch of the imagination.

quote:

---

Nature does not work that way. That is like saying homosexuality is a part of nature - it isn't.

---

You got that wrong =

as long as we let "nature" work its miracle, we will be in good hands.

"Diversity is our Strength" - is the immutable law of nature

What goes wrong is when the fricking DEMOCRATs start fooling around with the "diversity is our strength' truism as a POLITICAL TOOL

Diversity is our WEAKNESS - once you refuse to allow any dysfunctional creation to survive or die. Otherwise the entire universe would be populated by clogs of useless protoplasm surviving on the least common denominator of existence. Any advance by any one organism would immediately be sacrificed for the 'betterment of the lessors.' <== THAT is the end result of the DEMOCRAT platform (only to be enforced once THEY are in the leadership position to determine "what is best" for the 'lessors')

Nature is ruthless - if a combination of molecules happen to occur and the result is something that cannot survive within the then accepted natural world - then it dies out - by bye - try again some other epoch.

That is why homosexuality exists - but in limited numbers and specialized situations.

Once you give homosexuality an unnatural ADVANTAGE in the gene pool survival odds, you start getting a REDUCED benefit from Nature by not allowing it to work its irrefutable truths on the world.

We get harry chested long-haired lipstick wearing Generals in the Marine Corps who got there because of some DEI directive which PREVENTED a legion of more capable individuals who were much more qualified to perform the underlying MISSION of the Armed Forces = Kill People, and Break Things, and Win Wars. <=== that's IT - nothing else matters, or else the mission is not as STRONG as it should be. And when we LOSE the next war, those long-haired, hairy-chested, lipstick wearing Generals will be offering blow jobs to the ENEMIES in order to save their militarily worthless lives.

and /\ that /\ example can be restyled to fit into ANY category of human progress - education, commerce, entertainment, parenthood, charity, patriotism, care for future generations - etc.

NOTHING is advanced by acceptance of life forms that cannot find a spot in the culture without FORCEFUL action that is harmful to the whole.

IF - using your example - homosexuals just stuck to their original demands that 'let us live our lives without interference from government' --- that would have been GREAT - in fact that is the way NATURE works - as long as they are just being homosexual - we AGREE that there have been LAWs in the past that were NOT GOOD - i.e. they PREVENTED homosexuals from blending in with the rest of society to enjoy the benefits of their USEFULNESS.

And we CONSERVATIVEs said YES - that is GOOD - let us remove the RESTRICTIONs imposed by POLITICS and not NATURE.

but that is NOT what the DEMOCRATs wanted from the git-go - they didn't give a shite about homosexuals per-se (look what they do to a homosexual that does not march to their POLTICAL drumbeat - they attack them more viscously than they do me.)

DEMOCRATs use disadvantaged souls who are capable of a beneficial slot in society - but are NOT qualified to be at a HIGHER level of society based on their CAPABILITY.

DEMOCRATs make them feel OPPRESSED by their lack of capability - all the DEMOCRATs are interested in is getting their VOTEs to use to enforce DEMOCRAT initiatives in creating new world orders, setting up bigger slush funds for themselves, and guaranteeing their next "election victory" - they would rather drink warm spit than actually make homosexuals FREE to do whatever they wanted. Unless they are LOCK STEP with the POLITICAL agenda they are worse that WORTHLESS

/\ same situation for ANY 'democrat' preferred class - change homosexual to Race - Culture - homelessness - drug addicts - criminals - parasites - choose any description you want.

There is ONE dictum - IF you bow down to WHATEVER THE HELL WE WANT TO DO - we will give you enough crumbs to keep you alive, but unhappy enough to vote against ANY opposition we have.

That's it.

but note that I did not use the word REPUBLICAN or GOP anywhere in my commentary - they are just not quite as EVIL as the DEMOCRAT party has become - they are on their way - but for the time being - they are the only shelter in the storm.

The first thing nature requires - survive the current crisis - then do what is better overall.

Conservatives are in survival mode - we may have to endure unpleasant compatriots until the crisis if over.

quote:

---

You’re not the brightest bulb in the bunch are you?

---

he hasn't been allowed to advance to "bulb" status yet = the creators of his world have decided that he is better off staying in the 'wannabe bulb' state.

IF he should advance to "butb" status - he just MIGHT recognize that some OTHERs in his class are just a little BRIGHTER - and may want to emulate THEM instead of continuing to ATTACK them.

he is still in the 'gravel' state = where he will stay until he gets tired of being thrown at the bright bulbs.

quote:

---

I still cannot get a rational explanation as to the birth of a man in an ape family where they would have nurtured and raised that child to adulthood and then allowed that difference to procreate with one of theirs . Over and over and over.

---

The change is incremental so it’s not like you have two ape creatures raising a modern human. You have a series of more intelligent ape creatures raising increasingly intelligent offspring. Neanderthals also existed until we outbred, our hunted, and probably outright killed them off.

quote:

---

Nature does not work that way. That is like saying homosexuality is a part of nature - it isn't.

---

Animals engage in homosexual acts all the time., especially other apes. I’m not saying that homosexuality isn’t a moral wrong or a moral evil, but it is something that happens naturally in the wild. So does cannibalism. We try to hold ourselves to a higher standard than just what is natural

quote:

---

Of course dogs came from wolves as we domesticated and intentionally bred them.

---

So we controlled their evolution.

Now do horses, zebras, and donkeys.

Common ancestry is the explanation.

If you want to exclude hominids from that equation, so be it.

quote:

---

Where did you learn that?

---

There's evidence of buggery but it's almost certainly completely reptilian-brained find-the-hole instinct, not listening to Judy Garland records and choosing window treatments together. I have never seen a study of a higher order animal showing a preference for the same sex over the opposite sex.