- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Schumer says Democrats may refuse to vote on FBI pick
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:14 pm to Bestbank Tiger
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:14 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
That would be a brilliant troll.
I assume you're talking about trolling Trumpkins. Garland would receive broad support from Democrats.
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:15 pm to DyeHardDylan
McConnell better find a nuke type option. Schumer can eat a bag of
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:16 pm to SECSolomonGrundy
quote:
That's what the communists want. Destroy the FBI.
So you think Trump was ordered by his handlers to fire Comey?
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:18 pm to silverdude
quote:
how can you say this with a straight face when the Republicans refused to vote in the Democrats' Supreme Court pick last year?
What vote? Harry Reid is why Garland never got the chance to even be voted on. It's called payback. That's what pols do.
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:21 pm to DyeHardDylan
Schumer said that a special prosecutor was needed in order to restore faith in the American people.
My faith in America hasn't been this strong in years.
Is anyone out there experiencing shaky faith? For real?
My faith in America hasn't been this strong in years.
Is anyone out there experiencing shaky faith? For real?
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:21 pm to silverdude
quote:
how can you say this with a straight face when the Republicans refused to vote in the Democrats' Supreme Court pick last year?
Both are wrong - can we burn both parties now?
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:22 pm to Homesick Tiger
So then why would this be new- you guys were perfectly cool- even applauded Ken Starr's work, what's wrong with a Special Prosecutor now to look into a far, far more serious matter than Whitewater?
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:25 pm to DyeHardDylan
Theyll deserve whats coming in 2024.
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:27 pm to montanagator
quote:
So then why would this be new- you guys were perfectly cool- even applauded Ken Starr's work, what's wrong with a Special Prosecutor now to look into a far, far more serious matter than Whitewater?
Debatable as far as seriousness
Isn't the point of special prosecutor to grind admin to halt.
Tbh I would be cool with special investigator if you could find neutural one.
We don't even know if their is actionable Intel to justify investigation
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:27 pm to montanagator
quote:
So then why would this be new- you guys were perfectly cool- even applauded Ken Starr's work, what's wrong with a Special Prosecutor now to look into a far, far more serious matter than Whitewater?
You lost me. My post had to do with voting on Garland.
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:40 pm to DyeHardDylan
Water is wet... frick em nuke the bastards...
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:41 pm to silverdude
quote:
how can you say this with a straight face when the Republicans refused to vote in the Democrats' Supreme Court pick last year?
They just invoked the Biden rule.
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:42 pm to Homesick Tiger
quote:
what's wrong with a Special Prosecutor now to look into a far, far more serious matter than Whitewater?
Because there is no evidence. Just empty accusations.
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:47 pm to DyeHardDylan
Trump could want to repeal the 2nd Amendment, and Schumer and all the other Democrats would become the biggest pro-gun supporters ever. They don't give a crap about the country. Only care about opposing Trump, and grabbing power and control.
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:54 pm to montanagator
quote:
So you think Trump was ordered by his handlers to fire Comey?
You seem confused today.
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:55 pm to montanagator
quote:
more serious matter than Whitewater
Whitewater was at least criminal.
this is not criminal
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:56 pm to DyeHardDylan
This might be the Democrats best political strategy now: complete refusal to participate in anything that involves the Orange Outsider. Walk out. Total Resistance.
Bring everything to a halt until the 2020 election. Then remind the US electorate how Trump was unable to accomplish anything except soil himself, the Presidency and the USA.
MASSIVE help from mass media will carry the message to the US electorate, who will probably be persuaded.
This will be a good lesson to the US electorate: don't rock the boat again with some delusional idea that you can take back your country by voting for an Outsider. Stick with the Globalist Harvard/Yale paradigm and you can go back to your relatively quiet lives. The Globalists are going to fundamentally transform the USA and there isn't a God-damned thing you can do about, so don't be stupid ever AGAIN.
Bring everything to a halt until the 2020 election. Then remind the US electorate how Trump was unable to accomplish anything except soil himself, the Presidency and the USA.
MASSIVE help from mass media will carry the message to the US electorate, who will probably be persuaded.
This will be a good lesson to the US electorate: don't rock the boat again with some delusional idea that you can take back your country by voting for an Outsider. Stick with the Globalist Harvard/Yale paradigm and you can go back to your relatively quiet lives. The Globalists are going to fundamentally transform the USA and there isn't a God-damned thing you can do about, so don't be stupid ever AGAIN.
This post was edited on 5/14/17 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:57 pm to montanagator
quote:
what's wrong with a Special Prosecutor now to look into a far, far more serious matter than Whitewater?
Can you articulate what that far, far more serious matter consists of? What was the crime?
Popular
Back to top


1




