Started By
Message

re: Schumer says Democrats may refuse to vote on FBI pick

Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:14 pm to
Posted by Old Hellen Yeller
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
9916 posts
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

That would be a brilliant troll.


I assume you're talking about trolling Trumpkins. Garland would receive broad support from Democrats.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
162873 posts
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:15 pm to
McConnell better find a nuke type option. Schumer can eat a bag of
Posted by montanagator
Member since Jun 2015
16957 posts
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

That's what the communists want. Destroy the FBI.



So you think Trump was ordered by his handlers to fire Comey?
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
56127 posts
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

how can you say this with a straight face when the Republicans refused to vote in the Democrats' Supreme Court pick last year?


What vote? Harry Reid is why Garland never got the chance to even be voted on. It's called payback. That's what pols do.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
80154 posts
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:21 pm to
Schumer said that a special prosecutor was needed in order to restore faith in the American people.



My faith in America hasn't been this strong in years.

Is anyone out there experiencing shaky faith? For real?
Posted by thelawnwranglers
Member since Sep 2007
42023 posts
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

how can you say this with a straight face when the Republicans refused to vote in the Democrats' Supreme Court pick last year?


Both are wrong - can we burn both parties now?
Posted by montanagator
Member since Jun 2015
16957 posts
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:22 pm to
So then why would this be new- you guys were perfectly cool- even applauded Ken Starr's work, what's wrong with a Special Prosecutor now to look into a far, far more serious matter than Whitewater?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
297072 posts
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:25 pm to
Theyll deserve whats coming in 2024.
Posted by montanagator
Member since Jun 2015
16957 posts
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:26 pm to
?
Posted by thelawnwranglers
Member since Sep 2007
42023 posts
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

So then why would this be new- you guys were perfectly cool- even applauded Ken Starr's work, what's wrong with a Special Prosecutor now to look into a far, far more serious matter than Whitewater?





Debatable as far as seriousness

Isn't the point of special prosecutor to grind admin to halt.

Tbh I would be cool with special investigator if you could find neutural one.

We don't even know if their is actionable Intel to justify investigation
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
56127 posts
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

So then why would this be new- you guys were perfectly cool- even applauded Ken Starr's work, what's wrong with a Special Prosecutor now to look into a far, far more serious matter than Whitewater?


You lost me. My post had to do with voting on Garland.
Posted by stelly1025
Lafayette
Member since May 2012
9894 posts
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:40 pm to
Water is wet... frick em nuke the bastards...
Posted by tigersbh
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
12571 posts
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

how can you say this with a straight face when the Republicans refused to vote in the Democrats' Supreme Court pick last year?


They just invoked the Biden rule.
Posted by tigersbh
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
12571 posts
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

what's wrong with a Special Prosecutor now to look into a far, far more serious matter than Whitewater?


Because there is no evidence. Just empty accusations.
Posted by Pacito
Member since Jan 2013
1244 posts
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:47 pm to
Trump could want to repeal the 2nd Amendment, and Schumer and all the other Democrats would become the biggest pro-gun supporters ever. They don't give a crap about the country. Only care about opposing Trump, and grabbing power and control.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

So you think Trump was ordered by his handlers to fire Comey?


You seem confused today.

Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
80154 posts
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

more serious matter than Whitewater


Whitewater was at least criminal.

this is not criminal
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
53636 posts
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:56 pm to
This might be the Democrats best political strategy now: complete refusal to participate in anything that involves the Orange Outsider. Walk out. Total Resistance.

Bring everything to a halt until the 2020 election. Then remind the US electorate how Trump was unable to accomplish anything except soil himself, the Presidency and the USA.

MASSIVE help from mass media will carry the message to the US electorate, who will probably be persuaded.

This will be a good lesson to the US electorate: don't rock the boat again with some delusional idea that you can take back your country by voting for an Outsider. Stick with the Globalist Harvard/Yale paradigm and you can go back to your relatively quiet lives. The Globalists are going to fundamentally transform the USA and there isn't a God-damned thing you can do about, so don't be stupid ever AGAIN.
This post was edited on 5/14/17 at 2:58 pm
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 5/14/17 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

what's wrong with a Special Prosecutor now to look into a far, far more serious matter than Whitewater?


Can you articulate what that far, far more serious matter consists of? What was the crime?
Posted by Kashmir
Member since Dec 2014
9691 posts
Posted on 5/14/17 at 3:11 pm to
schumuck chuck!
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram