- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Scalise brings shame upon his office
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:41 pm to Tigeralum2008
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:41 pm to Tigeralum2008
The procedure was followed and determined it wasn't actionable, because it was bullshite.
0
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:41 pm to Tigeralum2008
quote:
Federal law specifies the procedure for reviewing WB complaints.
Which federal law?
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:43 pm to TigerJeff
quote:
TigerJeff
Well, he's not violating little boys like your side does
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:47 pm to Centinel
quote:
If proven, someone in the White House violated federal law.
Which federal law did they violate?
Be specific.
Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act
This post was edited on 10/23/19 at 2:48 pm
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:48 pm to Janky
quote:
I mean Trump has turned them into pro-war clowns in 3 years.
He’s even got some Democrats softening their stance on abortion, a sacred cow that even Jimmy Carter could not openly condemn like he probably wanted to on occasion. He’s definitely rattling cages no one else was willing to rattle in recent history. His slogan for the upcoming election should be DGAF.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:49 pm to TigerJeff
You assholes dish it out but you can’t take it.
I hope this is just the start
I hope this is just the start
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:50 pm to Tigeralum2008
quote:
It doesn't matter. Federal law specifies the procedure for reviewing WB complaints. If those procedures were ignored, the law was violated.
What about the WB failing to following the guidelines? They went to schiff first before the IG. Why is that ok?
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:52 pm to Tigeralum2008
quote:
Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act
You do understand this only applies to employees of the intelligence agencies and not the President or any of his staff, right?
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:52 pm to Tigeralum2008
That was followed and the DNI guy decided it was not of urgent concern. I believe that is what he said in his testimony in front of shitforbrains.
This post was edited on 10/23/19 at 2:54 pm
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:54 pm to Tigeralum2008
quote:
It doesn't matter. Federal law specifies the procedure for reviewing WB complaints. If those procedures were ignored, the law was violated.
You are correct.
It was violated by the alleged "whistleblower" and Schiff and his staff.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:55 pm to TigerJeff
Ok, kid.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:55 pm to The Spleen
quote:
Ken Starr's committee did that. His entire investigation was done behind closed doors.
You mean the Special Counsel Ken Starr and not Congressman Ken Starr? Right?
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:55 pm to PhDoogan
Why is this anchored?
Posted on 10/23/19 at 2:58 pm to Janky
quote:
Why is this anchored?
Probably because of the tard who started the thread.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 3:01 pm to Janky
quote:
That was followed and the DNI guy decided it was not of urgent concern. I believe that is what he said in his testimony in front of shitforbrains.
Good enough for me
Getting an explanation on the record is good for the American people. I have no problem with either party using legal means to obtain answers explaining the conduct of public officials.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 3:01 pm to TigerJeff
Were you wearing your pink vagina hat when you posted that garbage? Pathetic excuse for a human being.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 3:01 pm to TigerJeff
quote:
un-American
Are the Democrats being "American" with these shenanigans and out right lies?
C'mon man. It is time we stand up to the BS and it will call for new tactics.
I guess you would have called the Patriots during the Revolutionary War names as well since they fought with unconventional methods that the British found revolting.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 3:17 pm to Tigeralum2008
quote:
The republicans impeached a sitting president because he lied* about getting a BJ
*under oath
Posted on 10/23/19 at 3:34 pm to 3nOut
quote:
*under oath
Funny how they always leave that little part out. Doesn’t help their argument any, I guess.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 4:04 pm to TigerJeff
Son, I'm embarrassed for you. Dang.
Page 7 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News