- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sarah Sanders says President Trump is Building the wall in 21 days w/ or w/o Dems
Posted on 1/26/19 at 12:31 am to Langland
Posted on 1/26/19 at 12:31 am to Langland
I WOULD ignore them. The Constitution does not make them a supreme branch of government, above the others.
I would make the point that the Constitution calls all three branches equal, and the courts have overstepped their authority. This is an Executive Branch matter.
I would make the point that the Constitution calls all three branches equal, and the courts have overstepped their authority. This is an Executive Branch matter.
0
Posted on 1/26/19 at 12:31 am to Langland
quote:
I think he should. Does the court system have a military to stop Trump from building the wall? F em.
Trump being a authoritarian dictator is just a meme dude. Not real life.
Posted on 1/26/19 at 12:33 am to DallasTiger11
quote:
o you think he is going to ignore the courts?
National Emergencies via EO can go straight to the SC and the SC has never denied one.
This “tied up in courts” obstacle is not the challenge many leftists hope it will be.
Edit. I’m not a lawyer nor did I stay in Holiday Inn but I did hear that on Levin and confirmed with the Googles.
This post was edited on 1/26/19 at 12:35 am
Posted on 1/26/19 at 12:35 am to Robin Masters
quote:
National Emergencies via EO can go straight to the SC and the SC has never denied one.
This “tied up in courts” obstacle is not the challenge many leftists hope it will be.
shhhhhh
Posted on 1/26/19 at 12:37 am to hawgfaninc
Oh was that supposed to be a surprise? Lol. Whoops.
Posted on 1/26/19 at 12:39 am to Langland
quote:
I think he should. Does the court system have a military to stop Trump from building the wall? F em.
This feels shortsighted.
Posted on 1/26/19 at 12:39 am to berrycajun
He's being too magnanimous offering them the chance to sit at the table.
Our orange god is powerful but he is also merciful.
Our orange god is powerful but he is also merciful.
Posted on 1/26/19 at 12:51 am to Robin Masters
quote:
Edit. I’m not a lawyer nor did I stay in Holiday Inn but I did hear that on Levin and confirmed with the Googles.
genuine lol here
Posted on 1/26/19 at 12:53 am to DreauxB2015
quote:
but that 9th circuit though ......
We'll have a 6-3 conservative majority Supreme Court.
We can do whatever we want.
Posted on 1/26/19 at 12:54 am to AggieDub14
You don’t know what an “authoritarian” is.
Such fricking whiners
Such fricking whiners
Posted on 1/26/19 at 1:27 am to berrycajun
I WANT TO BELIEVE!!!!!
Posted on 1/26/19 at 1:30 am to DallasTiger11
quote:
There will be an immediate injunction and it will be held up until after the election in the courts
No it won’t. It will be streamlined. And the glorious Supreme Court with gorsuch and kavanaugh are gonna eat!!
Posted on 1/26/19 at 6:04 am to berrycajun
But libtards and their alters told me Trump lost..
Posted on 1/26/19 at 6:31 am to berrycajun
Hope so, no need to declare emergency, just use the military
Posted on 1/26/19 at 6:37 am to berrycajun
That should end well. Unilaterally spend 5.7b of taxpayer money on something you haven’t made a coherent case for. What could go wrong?
Posted on 1/26/19 at 6:37 am to berrycajun
Yeah ok whatever.
Trump is quickly losing my trust so I'll believe it when I see it. If nothing happens in 3 weeks he will be completely sunk.
Maybe he's banking on RBG being dead, I don't know.
As for the: declare a national emergency or just use the military crowd. Do you want a fascist revolution? Because that's how you get one.
Why in the hell would you want to set the precedent for the next Dem president to use a national emergency and the military to carry out his political agenda?
That's a terrifying and un-American thought.
And frankly so many of you supporting this notion is insane to me.
Trump is quickly losing my trust so I'll believe it when I see it. If nothing happens in 3 weeks he will be completely sunk.
Maybe he's banking on RBG being dead, I don't know.
As for the: declare a national emergency or just use the military crowd. Do you want a fascist revolution? Because that's how you get one.
Why in the hell would you want to set the precedent for the next Dem president to use a national emergency and the military to carry out his political agenda?
That's a terrifying and un-American thought.
And frankly so many of you supporting this notion is insane to me.
This post was edited on 1/26/19 at 6:46 am
Posted on 1/26/19 at 6:38 am to Robin Masters
quote:
Levin
Should be the new AG
Posted on 1/26/19 at 7:00 am to Nguyener
quote:When keeping it real goes wrong
And frankly so many of you supporting this notion is insane to me.
Posted on 1/26/19 at 7:14 am to berrycajun
It remains to be seen if this is a question of 'he who laughs last....'
Posted on 1/26/19 at 7:20 am to AggieDub14
quote:
So excited for authoritarianism
Dont act like you are opposed to it. We know who you support
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News