- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:13 pm to Vols&Shaft83
Restaurant had right to refuse service just like the gay bakers did too.... Difference is she isn’t going to sue and took the high road.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:16 pm to Jorts R Us
quote:you do realize that sometimes, people aren't on board for the whole time, right?
Off the top of my head? Your Soko media coverage on the summit thread got blown the frick up and didn’t you see back in there after that
Was i sitting the ONLINE watching direct questions asked of me while ignoring them?
Nope
Hell. I'm pretty sure that thread was LONG off the first page by the time i was back on although I'm not certain
This post was edited on 6/23/18 at 8:18 pm
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:17 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
Was i sitting the ONLINE watching direct questions asked of me while ignoring them?
Lol. You responded to every post in that thread except the one with a link that blew your premise up.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:18 pm to Jorts R Us
quote:
Lol. You responded to every post in that thread except the one with a link that blew your premise up
Then link me now because i don't recall
And unlike DS
I'll actually friggin answer
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:20 pm to ForeverGator
quote:
Now that apparently it’s okay with you guys that she’s doing this, the left will do it and then you’ll bitch that they’re using their official capacity to ruin a person/business.
There was a thread on here and stories in the MSm well before she tweeted. She tweeted a response. Calm down Frances.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:21 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
Then link me now because i don't rec
If you’re so inclined just search your topics
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:21 pm to Powerman
quote:
I'm pretty sure if you research the timeline here it was news before she tweeted about it
This. And from what I've seen from Powerman he doesn't seem to be all the beholden to any one "side".
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:23 pm to Jorts R Us
quote:
If you’re so inclined just search your topics
I figured it would help if you pointed to this post i should have responded to
If i recall. There were responses pointing to negative trump coverage in the SOKO press
Alas. My premise wasn't that there was zero negative coverage.
It was that when compared to our media's coverage, there was significant divergence.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:29 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
It was that when compared to our media's coverage, there was significant divergence.
That was more or less your premise. Unfortunately, there were several examples provided of where you were wrong which was interesting given how defiant you were about providing links.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:32 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
This. And from what I've seen from Powerman he doesn't seem to be all the beholden to any one "side".
I found out about it this morning because I'm facebook friends with Rex and he was of course praising the behavior
He was referencing the tweet from the employee. (edit to correct - it was a facebook post, not a tweet from the employee)
I'm too lazy to actually look it up right now but I'm pretty sure the tweet happened in almost real time and Sanders confirmed the events today. By then everyone already knew about it.
This post was edited on 6/23/18 at 8:40 pm
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:41 pm to Powerman
Semi un-related... but showing a quick difference between discrimination based on political affiliation and sexual orientation. Sexual orientation is merely a suspect class, political affiliation is nothing (as it should be.. same as if you just think someone is ugly — frick em). The left is desperately trying to make sexual orientation a fully protected class. Someone was explaining to me that the federal government officially classifies humans into 70-something classes. Is this true? If so, wow....
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:41 pm to Powerman
quote:
found out about it this morning because I'm facebook friends with Rex and he was of course praising the behavior
This board used to be great. When you were moderate/right and Rex was far left. Now you are moderate and Rex would be slightly left. The new Dems we have here are so left they are almost right.
At least you and Rex stick around to argue. Earlier today (in this thread) cruiser called the board idiots and said homosexuality was a protected class. When called out. Poof!
We may not agree. I may be a two bit ex-lawyer. But at least we have the old poli board to reminisce about!
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:44 pm to Jorts R Us
quote:
That was more or less your premise. Unfortunately, there were several examples provided of where you were wrong which was interesting given how defiant you were about providing links
How do you provide links for these breadth of coverage?
You realize that's silly, right?
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:45 pm to Powerman
quote:
I found out about it this morning because I'm facebook friends with Rex
I'm sorry
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:48 pm to Powerman
quote:Just out of curiosity, how do y'all know each other irl?
I'm facebook friends with Rex
Posted on 6/23/18 at 8:55 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
How do you provide links for these breadth of coverage? You realize that's silly, right?
As silly as comparing breadth of coverage to...breadth of coverage?
Every major paper in the country had a negative-spin story running on their website. You vastly overstated the divergence in coverage.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:00 pm to Jorts R Us
quote:huh?
As silly as comparing breadth of coverage to...breadth of coverage
quote:
Every major paper in the country had a negative-spin story running on their website. You vastly overstated the divergence in coverage.
Every link I went to I could find positive takes on the meetings. Every last one. I didn't say their entire take was positive
But good fricking luck finding any repeat any positive takes on CNN MSNBC etc etc and that was my point
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:02 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
What's telling is that there were circumstances the baker was willing to serve the gay couple, but no such considerations made for SHS. You're attempting to make an equivalence in a situation that's apples to oranges. This isn't about 1A, which I support in both instances. It's about the inequitable circumstances. You know this, and are being purposefully disingenuous.
Draconian——TBird just took you back to grammar school with this.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 9:06 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
Every link I went to I could find positive takes on the meetings. Every last one. I didn't say their entire take was positive
I find that incredibly hard to believe given the body of evidence presented in that thread.
Your premise in that thread was blown up. That was settled in the thread. The point is—when you get called for being wrong, you act like you are above backing up your point.
Page 14 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News