- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sandy Hook shooting victims' families win legal victory against InfoWars, Alex Jones
Posted on 1/11/19 at 6:24 pm to SlapahoeTribe
Posted on 1/11/19 at 6:24 pm to SlapahoeTribe
Could David wheeler be named as an actor ? He played multiple rolls at Sanday Hook as well as his rolls in a few low budget films back in the day just like his wife . Hmmm just a coincidence im sure . Fake news didnt start with Trump weve been getting bamboozled for many years .
This post was edited on 1/11/19 at 6:27 pm
1
Posted on 1/11/19 at 6:29 pm to Old Hellen Yeller
quote:
What are you getting at here? Do you believe the Sandy Hook massacre was faked?
Does it matter what I think?
Some people think it is faked.
Some people don't think it was faked.
I am for the truth. If it was faked, I want to know. If it really happened, I want to know.
Clean up crews exist that clean up blood and stuff after horrific crimes. If it really happened then who did the clean up? Should be pretty easy to dispel the myth that no clean up crew was hired. A Freedom of information act SHOULD be able to show which company did the work.
I just find it odd the this information will not be released. Do you find that odd?
Posted on 1/11/19 at 6:32 pm to SCLibertarian
Reading between the lines, Jones filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that his speech was protected as a matter of law, but a statement does not constitute “political speech“ if it was made with a profit motive.
Basically, it appears that the families said “we fall within this exception and should be able to do some discovery.“. The discovery that this judge just allowed is intended to examine the potential “profit motive.“
Maybe Jones wins in the end, and maybe he does not. This interim ruling on a discovery matter simply says that the plaintiffs can conduct a thorough investigation of their claims under the rules of discovery.
Basically, it appears that the families said “we fall within this exception and should be able to do some discovery.“. The discovery that this judge just allowed is intended to examine the potential “profit motive.“
Maybe Jones wins in the end, and maybe he does not. This interim ruling on a discovery matter simply says that the plaintiffs can conduct a thorough investigation of their claims under the rules of discovery.
This post was edited on 1/11/19 at 8:49 pm
Posted on 1/11/19 at 6:35 pm to omegaman66
quote:
Does it matter what I think? Some people think it is faked. Some people don't think it was faked. I am for the truth. If it was faked, I want to know. If it really happened, I want to know. Clean up crews exist that clean up blood and stuff after horrific crimes. If it really happened then who did the clean up? Should be pretty easy to dispel the myth that no clean up crew was hired. A Freedom of information act SHOULD be able to show which company did the work. I just find it odd the this information will not be released. Do you find that odd?
After a quick google search, it appears that “who cleaned up Sandy Hook?” is as popular in conspiracy dens as “jet fuel can’t melt steel beams!”
There is no point in arguing with a conspiracy nut.
Posted on 1/11/19 at 6:42 pm to omegaman66
Because it's not the same guy. A mole is not uncommon.
Posted on 1/11/19 at 6:42 pm to Old Hellen Yeller
So whats the answer ? Who cleaned up the blood ?
Posted on 1/11/19 at 6:44 pm to Old Hellen Yeller
quote:
There is no point in arguing with a conspiracy nut.
So, I guess that means you can't tell me. I just want the truth. Is that what you want?
This post was edited on 1/11/19 at 6:46 pm
Posted on 1/11/19 at 6:47 pm to Jake88
Lol , not the same guy . Same nose , same mole in exact place , and same hook in his eyebrow . A simple search will show this isnt the only picture of sloppy sniper . Epic fail baw .
This post was edited on 1/11/19 at 6:49 pm
Posted on 1/11/19 at 6:49 pm to DreauxB2015
You are a boob. It is not the same nose and not the same eyebrows and nowhere near the same earlobes. The man in the SWAT uniform is named Bill Aldenberg. Epic fail you paranoid 'tard.
Posted on 1/11/19 at 6:51 pm to omegaman66
quote:
OK, down voters of DreauxB2015. Why did you did you down vote his post? All I am doing asking for an explanation of what your down vote of his post means. Seems pretty straight forward question.
Because you are all a bunch of lunatics and there’s no point in arguing with you. Go frick yourself
Posted on 1/11/19 at 6:52 pm to Jake88
Lol post a picture of Aldenburg then tard and let everyone see him . Do it . Clown.
Posted on 1/11/19 at 6:55 pm to DreauxB2015
Pic at link LINK
Posted on 1/11/19 at 6:56 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
This can be quickly resolved with an exhumation and dna analysis by independent labs.
Posted on 1/11/19 at 7:03 pm to Jake88
Moles are uncommon yet Bill doesnt have one . Try again . Does bill also have the hook left eyebrow? Or the bags under his eyes? Geez dude you lap up the fake news bravo .
This post was edited on 1/11/19 at 7:09 pm
Posted on 1/11/19 at 7:06 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Free press dead
Posted on 1/11/19 at 7:07 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Maybe Jones wins in the end, and maybe he does not.
He should, and he will.
If AJ ultimately loses this case, what about all the people like Rosie O'Donnell who have used various platforms to say that 9/11 was an inside job? Regardless of what anybody believes happened on 9/11, couldn't those victims sue truthers?
Posted on 1/11/19 at 7:09 pm to DreauxB2015
He does have a mole. In fact, it looks like two, one over the other, seen in both the SWAT uniform and the interview pic. When you furrow your brow, it takes a different shape...imagine that.
This is how you lunatics go though. I showed you who it was and you'll deny it forever because to find out you're not one of the select few who managed to discover a conspiracy and see through the "lies" means you're simply an unremarkable guy. You're not special.
This is how you lunatics go though. I showed you who it was and you'll deny it forever because to find out you're not one of the select few who managed to discover a conspiracy and see through the "lies" means you're simply an unremarkable guy. You're not special.
This post was edited on 1/11/19 at 7:13 pm
Posted on 1/11/19 at 7:10 pm to SlapahoeTribe
Something about Sandy Hook has just never sat right with me. I remember the day it happened getting told all sorts of odd stories that changed on the regular. These were not minor variations either. There are many other troubling things like the creepy medical examiner, the lack of footage of the scene, the creepy neighbor guy who took the kids in his home from his driveway...there was just a lot of curious stuff going on and I simply dont think we were told anything close to the full story on this incident. I'm not going all conspiracy on SH but I do think each occurrence needs to be vetted by its own individual merits. Las Vegas is another that obviously doesn't add up but say Parkland...I think that one is pretty straight forward and truthful. Sandy Hook though just has too many oddities for my full truth smell test.
Posted on 1/11/19 at 7:11 pm to HubbaBubba
Original question of who cleaned up the blood has remained unanswered here. Not surprising since investigators have not been able to find that information out either.
So, I apologize for the loaded question. So I will retract that question and pose another, that hopefully will be answered and debunk at least part of this crazy arse conspiracy theory.
Why won't the gov't officials involved release that information? Or why have police meet an old man and a camera man at the court house and refused them entry? Citing that the office workers inside were to scared to let them in.
OK, I realize this shooting really took place. I just want some ammo to fight the nuts. I have seen the video of the court house and I don't understand why this FOIA request has met with such a response?
Let me know the answer. I am trying to straighten out a few weirdo's that believe this crazy theory and need to know what to tell them.
Anyone?
So, I apologize for the loaded question. So I will retract that question and pose another, that hopefully will be answered and debunk at least part of this crazy arse conspiracy theory.
Why won't the gov't officials involved release that information? Or why have police meet an old man and a camera man at the court house and refused them entry? Citing that the office workers inside were to scared to let them in.
OK, I realize this shooting really took place. I just want some ammo to fight the nuts. I have seen the video of the court house and I don't understand why this FOIA request has met with such a response?
Let me know the answer. I am trying to straighten out a few weirdo's that believe this crazy theory and need to know what to tell them.
Anyone?
Posted on 1/11/19 at 7:14 pm to omegaman66
quote:
omegaman66
“Crazy people don’t know they’re going crazy. They think they are getting saner.”
-John Locke
This post was edited on 1/11/19 at 7:15 pm
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News