- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:35 pm to Jjdoc
If he loses or settles, will you still believe dominion machines flipped votes?
Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:35 pm to lsutigermall
Serious question, how much CNN do you watch?
Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:37 pm to WDE24
quote:
They asked for too much money in violation of the constitution.
You interpreted that very different than a reasonable person would have.
Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:37 pm to Dizz
Defending your client does allow you to make allegations on a good faith information and belief. If the allegations turn out to be unproved after the trial on the merits then you are still immune from suit (or rather the suit is subject to a privilege defense) which shields lawyers from liability for things stated in Court pleadings unless there was actual knowledge of falsity.
Things like - what Dominion's instruction manual says, Texas rejecting them bc they were so insecure, Michigan and Georgia machine malfunctions, Dominion's CEO lying to the face of a Michigan Legislator as he denied that the machines could be hooked up to the internet support a good faith allegation that the machines were at least part of this fraud scheme.
Further, Truth is a defense to a defamation claim. Which means - break open the Dominion mahcines in every state in the footprint.
Things like - what Dominion's instruction manual says, Texas rejecting them bc they were so insecure, Michigan and Georgia machine malfunctions, Dominion's CEO lying to the face of a Michigan Legislator as he denied that the machines could be hooked up to the internet support a good faith allegation that the machines were at least part of this fraud scheme.
Further, Truth is a defense to a defamation claim. Which means - break open the Dominion mahcines in every state in the footprint.
Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:38 pm to dafif
quote:
There a few real idiots posting on this thread
I can no longer tell the real idiots from the fake ones.
What the hell does that make me?
Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:38 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:
Nobody is afraid of Rudy and his nutjob witnesses.
Muh Russians!
Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:38 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
He is absolutely right about that. Dominion seems unconcerned.
"Seems" being the key word, lol. Filing the suit, even if it never goes to trial, shows future customers that they tried to defend themselves, a little, lol.
Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:39 pm to moneyg
quote:
quote:
They asked for too much money in violation of the constitution.
quote:
You interpreted that very different than a reasonable person would have.
There is a punis claim, right? But it's a 1:1 ration in this suit IIRC. That would easily clear constitutionality.
Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:39 pm to Floating Change Up
quote:
I can no longer tell the real idiots from the fake ones.
I'm real.
Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:40 pm to Wednesday
quote:
Defending your client does allow you to make allegations on a good faith information and belief. If the allegations turn out to be unproved after the trial on the merits then you are still immune from suit (or rather the suit is subject to a privilege defense) which shields lawyers from liability for things stated in Court pleadings unless there was actual knowledge of falsity.
Absolutely correct. That said, I think Dominion is focused on his extra-judicial statements. I wouldn't think those are privileged.
Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:41 pm to moneyg
quote:It’s what Rudy said. He said the amount asked for is an act of intimidation to wipe out and censor free speech and the ability of lawyers to vigorously represent their clients and that he is going to explore a counter suit for those constitutional violations.
You interpreted that very different than a reasonable person would have.
Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:42 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
Dominion ceo: I'm sorry your honor, those were lost in an unfortunate fishing accident
Or blown up in the Nashville RV Propane accident.
Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:42 pm to Wednesday
when a defendant in a defamation suit threatens to investigate whether his slanders are actually true, he is acknowledging that he has a big problem.
Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:43 pm to Wednesday
quote:
Defending your client does allow you to make allegations on a good faith information and belief. If the allegations turn out to be unproved after the trial on the merits then you are still immune from suit (or rather the suit is subject to a privilege defense) which shields lawyers from liability for things stated in Court pleadings unless there was actual knowledge of falsity.
This suit is based on what Rudy said in the public not in court. I don’t think any of the pleadings he signed alleged fraud or had the claims against Dominion.
Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:44 pm to Jjdoc
How was dominion injured? If anything, they have business of everyone trying to stay in office "by any means necessary"
Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:45 pm to Wednesday
quote:
Further, Truth is a defense to a defamation claim. Which means - break open the Dominion mahcines in every state in the footprint.
Dominion will have to prove Rudy's statements are false.
Rudy does not have to prove they are true.
Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:45 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:Agree. They are timing these lawsuits in a way to define the exact lawyer client relationships.
Absolutely correct. That said, I think Dominion is focused on his extra-judicial statements. I wouldn't think those are privileged.
Posted on 1/25/21 at 12:47 pm to BiteMe2020
quote:I assume one of Rudy’s affirmative defenses will be asserting truth. To succeed on that affirmative defense, he will have to prove they are true.
Rudy does not have to prove they are true.
Page 2 of 8
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News