- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rittenhouse prosecutors ask that men shot not be described as 'looters' or 'rioters'
Posted on 10/25/21 at 5:03 pm to SouthEndzoneTiger
Posted on 10/25/21 at 5:03 pm to SouthEndzoneTiger
The only problem with Rittenhouse is that there were 1000 more just like him last summer.
If the police are going to abandon the people to the mob, then the people should be allowed to mow down the mob.
In a just world, people like Kyle would have killed thousands last summer and put a stop to that shite with a quickness.
If the police are going to abandon the people to the mob, then the people should be allowed to mow down the mob.
In a just world, people like Kyle would have killed thousands last summer and put a stop to that shite with a quickness.
0
Posted on 10/25/21 at 5:07 pm to Godfather1
quote:it's always been about winning and it's never been about justice. it's about the law. we have a legal system not a justice system. they are definably different.
Lawyers in this country have ceased to act in the best interest of justice. It’s all about winning and losing now.
Posted on 10/25/21 at 5:10 pm to SouthEndzoneTiger
quote:
Why? Why not be allowed to call them what they were?
Well we know some folks are looters there. We don't know that these 3 specifically were.
quote:
What's the difference? Self defense is self defense.
Well but is his expertise in law enforcement situations or civilian situations? Or just general self defense?
quote:
Their criminal history goes toward their character. it shows they were in fact rioting and not selling girl scout cookies. This just infuriates me.
Past criminal history is often thrown out in cases as to avoid bias.
Posted on 10/25/21 at 5:14 pm to oklahogjr
quote:I would argue that if a situation justified a LE officer to feel threatened enough to require "self defense" that the same situation would justify a civilian even more so.
Well but is his expertise in law enforcement situations or civilian situations? Or just general self defense?
Posted on 10/25/21 at 5:14 pm to SouthEndzoneTiger
They are trying their best to stack the deck against this kid. 
Posted on 10/25/21 at 5:17 pm to evil cockroach
quote:.
Ya know. It’s usually a bad idea to roll up into a town you don’t live in , with no family property to defend, with a weapon , looking to be a vigilante
The cops thanked him for being there. And though it wasn’t family, it was a friend’s store he was protecting. Vigilante? That’s just an outright lie, as usual by lefties. Look up the word and then describe why he was there. You are either lying or ignorant. Oh, and a bad idea, looks liuu my e he succeeded to me. Put out a fire, defended the establishment and himself, and ended some bad guys.
Posted on 10/25/21 at 5:21 pm to TBoy
So starting a fire is not rioting?
Posted on 10/25/21 at 5:27 pm to Godfather1
quote:
Lawyers in this country have ceased to act in the best interest of justice. It’s all about winning and losing now.
It's a criminal trial.
Posted on 10/25/21 at 5:31 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
Well we know some folks are looters there. We don't know that these 3 specifically were.
So what’s your personal opinion based on the facts we know? Rioters, looters, peaceful protestors? What say you, in your opinion?
As for your self defense question, I ask again, what’s the difference? Please explain the difference in police vs civilian self defense.
And as far as your last comment, tyy hit e claim that they not be referred to as rioters makes there criminal history relevant. You want to claim they were selling Girl Scout cookies, but want to hide the character issue that shows they weren’t? Can’t have your cake and eat it too. You lefties are amazing.
Posted on 10/25/21 at 5:44 pm to SouthEndzoneTiger
quote:
And as far as your last comment, tyy hit e claim that they not be referred to as rioters makes there criminal history relevant. You want to claim they were selling Girl Scout cookies, but want to hide the character issue that shows they weren’t? Can’t have your cake and eat it too. You lefties are amazing.
You don't have any idea what you're talking about and jump on posters based on what you think the law should be.
If it was your son that was shot, there is no way you would want for him to be called a rioter without evidence being presented AT THIS TRIAL to support that charterization.
Posted on 10/25/21 at 5:44 pm to SouthEndzoneTiger
quote:There’s probably quite a difference.
As for your self defense question, I ask again, what’s the difference? Please explain the difference in police vs civilian self defense.
If I bust into someone’s house and the start shooting me I probably can’t claim self defense and shoot them back.
Cops can.
Posted on 10/25/21 at 6:21 pm to SouthEndzoneTiger
That's not how this works
Posted on 10/25/21 at 6:25 pm to SouthEndzoneTiger
frick the commies. Law is the law. They attacked a kid and paid the price. Rittenhouse should have a statue.
Posted on 10/25/21 at 6:32 pm to SouthEndzoneTiger
We might as well change our name to the USSR because that’s what we are now. The FBI operates as the state secret police to stamp out political opposition. The bureaucracy is used to enforce the dictators mandates. And even the judiciary is nothing more than another tool of the party to crush political opposition. Our constitutional republic has ceased to exist.
Posted on 10/25/21 at 7:03 pm to SouthEndzoneTiger
quote:
So what’s your personal opinion based on the facts we know? Rioters, looters, peaceful protestors? What say you, in your opinion?
No idea who they are or were and I'm not sure why it would be relevant.
quote:
As for your self defense question, I ask again, what’s the difference? Please explain the difference in police vs civilian self defense.
That's not really what matters here though. It really depends on what the witness is testifying to and what his expertise and experience are in. How does it relate to this situation and is it apples to apples or is it to shape a story to a jury based on unrelated info?
quote:
You want to claim they were selling Girl Scout cookies, but want to hide the character issue that shows they weren’t? Can’t have your cake and eat it too. You lefties are amazing.
No i don't make any claims about them good or bad. Who they are isn't really relevant since they aren't on trial.
Kyle is on trial. This is about him and his actions and whether or not they're justified.
Posted on 10/25/21 at 7:04 pm to oklahogjr
You want him to be guilty
Posted on 10/26/21 at 10:57 pm to SouthEndzoneTiger
Glad the judge did not go along with the DA...gives me hope Rittenhouse will get a fair trial.
quote:
The three men shot by Kyle Rittenhouse during a protest against police brutality can be labeled rioters, looters or arsonists if the teen's defense team has evidence to support the characterizations — but they shouldn't be called victims, the Wisconsin judge in Rittenhouse's murder trial ruled this week.
Posted on 10/26/21 at 11:43 pm to Perse
Rioters and arsonists it is then! Maybe looters also if they have video proof of that also or 1st hand witness testimony.
But not victims. That is pretty telling. This Judge will make the prosecutors demonstrate beyond a doubt that they were victims for them to ever be allowed to be labeled as such. And that is not probable.
But not victims. That is pretty telling. This Judge will make the prosecutors demonstrate beyond a doubt that they were victims for them to ever be allowed to be labeled as such. And that is not probable.
Posted on 10/27/21 at 12:37 am to SouthEndzoneTiger
Rioters and looters were the least of what those POS should be called.
Posted on 10/27/21 at 11:34 am to SouthEndzoneTiger
YouTube that explains some of the judges ruling so far
Most are positive for Kyle.
I know this board thinks Im a lefty, but this kid was justified to defend himself based on what we know so far.
Most are positive for Kyle.
I know this board thinks Im a lefty, but this kid was justified to defend himself based on what we know so far.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News