- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Reuters: Iran announces plan to build nuclear subs in violation of Iran Nuclear Deal.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 11:56 am to VOLhalla
Posted on 12/13/16 at 11:56 am to VOLhalla
quote:
The article says that Congress extended sanctions on Iran which violates the agreement. If the US has already broken the deal why would Iran abide by it? Sounds like there isn't an Iran deal at the moment.
This is gonna sound crazy but maybe Obama should have negotiated a treaty instead of a "deal".
1
Posted on 12/13/16 at 11:57 am to ILeaveAtHalftime
quote:
So no. Nothing about weapons. Just lots of probably and maybe and "could lead to". Yawn. Just another fearmongering article about the Middle East. Hey, they have to keep our military over there somehow
nah, no problem with them having boats a lot quieter and a huge range compared to anything they may have now
They will probably use them to fish.
idiot
Posted on 12/13/16 at 11:59 am to JoeHackett
What is the difference and what stops a country from breaking a treaty?
Posted on 12/13/16 at 12:03 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
I heard on top of all the dough Obama gave them he added a cash bonus and some say there may be other things he promised Iran or more money given.
It is ludicrous! If this were a non-dem POTUS; they would be tarred and feathered and removed from office.
It is ludicrous! If this were a non-dem POTUS; they would be tarred and feathered and removed from office.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 12:04 pm to gthog61
Iran has not invaded another country since the Qajar Dynasty in the 1850's. Our politicians are bought and paid for by Saudi oil money and thus are being used as proxies to destroy the Iranian state. 19 of the 20 hijackers on 9-11 were Saudi's. Their madrassas are the foundation for radical Salafism that forms the core of ISIL. They are currently bombing Yemen to assist AQAP in the many-pronged Yemeni Civil War. Yet we want to go to war with Iran? They should be helping us eliminate ISIL and Al Qaeda.
This post was edited on 12/13/16 at 12:06 pm
Posted on 12/13/16 at 12:06 pm to VOLhalla
Treaties are ratified by the Senate. There's then a legal process to amending treaties.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 12:06 pm to SCLibertarian
Iran has called for death to Christians and Jews and swears they will wipe Israel off the map.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 12:11 pm to ILeaveAtHalftime
quote:
Why do we feel that we even have a basis for restricting the type of boats other sovereign nations can build? Is this simply referring to a nuclear propulsion system? Because there isn't really anything wrong or dangerous to America about that
I assume b/c we gave them billions of dollars with an agreement not to do that and they accepted the agreement.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 12:12 pm to cajunangelle
The same can be said of Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Oman and Qatar. Those countries are our allies, despite their laws and beliefs. However, unlike those countries, the Iranians are Shia Muslims and thus are deemed apostates by members of ISIL and Al Qaeda. Therefore, they have more of an interest to see these terrorist groups defeated. There are no good guys in that area of the world, but we have much more in common with Iran than we think.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 12:21 pm to MrCarton
Yup great post. We need to put John McCain out to pasture along with his MIC war monger if cronies. They use the media to keep this fake news propaganda rolling not telling the real story of our past involvement in ME.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 12:22 pm to ILeaveAtHalftime
The intention of the Iran deal was to avoid war with Iran. I haven't been too critical on this because it at least shows the rest of the world that if war with Iran is ever necessary, it's because of them.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 12:36 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
"Rouhani's move followed recent remarks by Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his hardline allies harshly criticizing the deal's failure to yield any swift economic improvements in Iran."
Yeah, well that's not our job, or our problem, you goat humping, pedophile worshipping fricktard.
Yeah, well that's not our job, or our problem, you goat humping, pedophile worshipping fricktard.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 12:50 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
In Iran's eyes, this is a-ok. The Koran states that is ok to lie to the infidel . So, yea, business as usual.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 1:07 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
does no one here understand why Iran may think a nuclear weapon is its only defense against a world superpower bent on destroying it?
I think the opposite, which has been stated repeatedly by many different people. Iran increases the odds of their destruction if they possess a nuke.
This post was edited on 12/13/16 at 1:08 pm
Posted on 12/13/16 at 1:15 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
Can someone who does not think this is a weapon development please tell me how many civilian maratime me vessels there in the world powered by a nuclear plant?
Posted on 12/13/16 at 1:18 pm to Zahrim
Let them build it. It will make for a bigger explosion when TRUMP blow the SOB up!
Posted on 12/13/16 at 1:19 pm to Zahrim
quote:
Can someone who does not think this is a weapon development please tell me how many civilian maratime me vessels there in the world powered by a nuclear plant?
A nuclear sub is not a nuclear weapon.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 1:26 pm to ILeaveAtHalftime
Too late to fear monger when you're dead.
You stop evil shite before it happens
You stop evil shite before it happens
Posted on 12/13/16 at 1:40 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
After deposing Mossadegh in the 1950's, providing weapons and money to Saddam Hussein to launch two invasions of Iran in the 1980's and our slavish support of the tyrannical Gulf States, does no one here understand why Iran may think a nuclear weapon is its only defense against a world superpower bent on destroying it?
If I was Iran, I'd be hell bent on obtaining nukes. Seems the only way to protect yourself from American imperialism.
Posted on 12/13/16 at 1:56 pm to Cadello
quote:
Too late to fear monger when you're dead.
You stop evil shite before it happens
The wal mart version of the political platitude.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News