Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Republicans deny Schumer's third attempt to delay ACB confirmation this week

Posted on 10/21/20 at 5:10 pm
Posted by WPBTiger
Parts Unknown
Member since Nov 2011
30876 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 5:10 pm
LINK

quote:

Sen. Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., put up a fight on Wednesday against confirming Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court by filing a point of order, or an objection to voting on Barrett’s confirmation before the November election.

The New York Democrat’s motion for the Senate not to consider any Supreme Court nomination so close to the election was his third attempt to delay the process this week. Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, the Senate’s presiding officer, called Schumer’s point of order “not ripe for decision,” and denied it.

Schumer raised a parliamentary inquiry asking if the Senate had ever considered a SCOTUS nominee so close to an election. "According to Parliamentarian, Secretary of Senate's office confirms it has not," Romney said before denying Schumer's point of order, or complaint, that Senate rules are not being followed.


quote:

Schumer appealed Romney’s ruling, then moved to table, or kill, his own appeal, forcing senators to go on record with their vote to move forward, after noting that no Supreme Court nominee had been confirmed after July in an election year.

The vote fell along party lines-- 51 Republicans voted to block the appeal and 44 Democrats voted against.
Posted by Iron Lion
North of the river
Member since Nov 2014
11801 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 5:11 pm to
frick you Chuck
Posted by cardswinagain
Member since Jun 2013
11870 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 5:12 pm to
Posted by Sev09
Nantucket
Member since Feb 2011
15555 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 5:13 pm to
Based Mitt??
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
53768 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 5:13 pm to
chuck u
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

Sen. Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., put up a fight on Wednesday against confirming Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court by filing a point of order, or an objection to voting on Barrett’s confirmation before the November election.

The New York Democrat’s motion for the Senate not to consider any Supreme Court nomination so close to the election was his third attempt to delay the process this week. Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, the Senate’s presiding officer, called Schumer’s point of order “not ripe for decision,” and denied it.

Schumer raised a parliamentary inquiry asking if the Senate had ever considered a SCOTUS nominee so close to an election. "According to Parliamentarian, Secretary of Senate's office confirms it has not," Romney said before denying Schumer's point of order, or complaint, that Senate rules are not being followed.


Posted by PhillyTiger90
Member since Dec 2015
10667 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 5:16 pm to
Wow Mitt not being a ginormous douchebag for once

It’s actually refreshing
Posted by jatilen
Member since May 2020
13608 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 5:17 pm to
Posted by Pisco
Mayfield, Kentucky
Member since Dec 2019
3730 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 5:55 pm to
Actually Reeeeeee didn’t do anything. Any inquiry or point of order must be in writing and given to the parliamentarian to read. They then tell the presiding officer what to say based on the findings by the Secretary of the Senate's office. There are standing rules of the Senate that have to be followed. So Mitt just did what he was told.
Posted by LSURulzSEC
Lake Charles via Oakdale
Member since Aug 2004
77292 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 6:00 pm to
You have no one to blame but yourselves you piece of shite and you know it. You know you and Reid fricked up and now y’all are paying for it...elections have consequences motherfricker...
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
24666 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 6:12 pm to
Posted by AURaptor
South
Member since Aug 2018
11958 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 6:17 pm to
Denied 3x's?

Does Chuck now identify as Jesus ?
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
131250 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 6:21 pm to
"I beg you not to break the rules of the Senate in order to change the rules of the Senate. If you do, you may come to regret it. And you may come to regret a lot sooner than you think". --- Mitch McConnell to the worm Harry Reid.


The democrats are reaping exactly the sowed.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76501 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 6:22 pm to
This is all Senate procedure. It was happening no matter what.
Posted by choppadocta
Louisiana
Member since May 2014
1839 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 6:33 pm to
Before the cuck crowed?




Posted by olemc999
At a blackjack table
Member since Oct 2010
13256 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 6:49 pm to
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
15648 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 6:51 pm to
Is he trying to earn his nickname “Cryin’ Chuck?”
Posted by Whodat4300
Tennessee
Member since Jul 2020
266 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 7:26 pm to
I just read that the Dems won’t show for the vote. Someone please tell me they won’t succeed in blocking her confirmation???
Posted by xxTIMMYxx
Member since Aug 2019
17562 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 7:28 pm to
Crying Chuck
Posted by Pisco
Mayfield, Kentucky
Member since Dec 2019
3730 posts
Posted on 10/21/20 at 9:23 pm to
No. It’s merely we’re not showing up and we’re gonna stand in solidarity together bullshite. This has no bearing on her confirmation. She’ll be voted out tomorrow and Mitch can bring up the nomination for debate on the Senate floor Friday. I assume they’ll work Saturday and he’ll file cloture then.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram