Started By
Message

re: Republicans and Democrats vote down amendment that would allow for cheaper drugs

Posted on 1/12/17 at 3:26 pm to
Posted by guedeaux
Member since Jan 2008
13862 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

That doesn't fundamentally change the fact that this amendment still allows the FDA to determine what "safely" import means.


It seems everyone in here is an expert on 21 CFR.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128773 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 3:26 pm to
Free trade is awesome. Pretending medicine is coming from Canada isn't giving perfect information to the consumer.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
46845 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 3:27 pm to
Those who voted it down did so due to drugs not meeting US federal safety standards. I can't argue against that.

If our standards are too strict, then those standards can be looked at and changed accordingly, but I don't mind standards being part of the process of importation.
Posted by MSMHater
Houston
Member since Oct 2008
23248 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

Do you think Pharma companies are going to ship enough meds to Canada to also supply the United States?


While also generating substantially less revenue for those items?

Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8641 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 3:28 pm to
quote:


It says 'safe'. Since that leaves it up to the FDA to determine what is 'safe', which is basically what Booker would have asked for anyway, I don't understand his problem.

Unless his problem is simply the $240,000 that Pharma gave him. In which case I understand.

Also, as much as I am protectionist, labor to produce drugs in Canada cannot be substantially different from ours. Unless there are burdensome regulations to manufacture in the US, which they probably are, I don't see what the negative impact could be.


It's not really about regulation and labor in the traditional sense - well, it sort of is and sort of isn't.

Essentially, an immense amount of the costs of R&D and the creation of the IP gets passed on to the American private health insurance customer (whether group or individual) and to a lesser degree, the American on the public insurance dole (Medicaid and Medicare).

Other countries' governments with the Beveridge or Bismarck or NHI models have massive purchasing power because of the size and scope of their "market", such as it is, and it's the only way that the pharma companies can get into the countries. Because the marginal cost of a pill is negligible, it still makes financial sense for them to drastically drop rates because it's either sell here or don't sell at all. Thus, the R&D costs have to covered by someone - you and me - else the drugs wouldn't be developed in the first place.

It'd be a cleaner and more permanent solution for us to take this to WIPO and bully the rest of the developed world into paying their fair share for the IP than it is to do one off agreements like this. We have the power to do this: some 80% of the world's pharma R&D and IP comes out of the U.S.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
37510 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

I don't think that's accurate


It absolutely is accurate. Big Pharma hates Canada and the importation because the prices they pay in Canada is negotiated by the Canadian government( whether you agree with this is besides the point right now) Eli Lilly, Bayer, etc. all do huge business there and if you were to go to any Pharmacy in Toronto or Montreal it would be the same as going to a pharmacy in Boston or Cleveland or San Francisco.
Posted by AjaxFury
In & out of The Matrix
Member since Sep 2014
9928 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

Free trade is awesome. Pretending medicine is coming from Canada isn't giving perfect information to the consumer.


This doesn't sound like a hard fix to develop a reliable vetting process.

You think Canada's govt pushes shite drugs on their citizens knowingly?
Or that they would simply pass on the shite drugs to the US
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 3:29 pm to
I'm not a 21 CFF expert at all. At the same, arguing that allowing the FDA to craft rules around reimportation from Canada is somehow more risky than the FDA crafting rules to import directly from third world countries is ridiculous.

Booker's statement is a total fabrication.
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 3:31 pm to
No one today knows or checks where their medicine is manufactured. If the problem is bad labeling then require a re-importation warning.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128773 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

you were to go to any Pharmacy in Toronto or Montreal it would be the same as going to a pharmacy in Boston or Cleveland or San Francisco.


Mostly true.
Now how do you 1) ensure drugs imported to the United States are actually from Canada and 2) how do you fool the pharma companies into shipping their American inventories to Canada?
Posted by guedeaux
Member since Jan 2008
13862 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

I'm not a 21 CFF expert at all. At the same, arguing that allowing the FDA to craft rules around reimportation from Canada is somehow more risky than the FDA crafting rules to import directly from third world countries is ridiculous.


Look at how the FDA "crafts" rules. It's a fairly public process which invites review and critique of any changes to the CFR. It's actually a better process than congress making laws, in my opinion.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128773 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

I'm not a 21 CFF expert at all. At the same, arguing that allowing the FDA to craft rules around reimportation from Canada is somehow more risky than the FDA crafting rules to import directly from third world countries is ridiculous.


If there are extra regulations on Canadian reimports, what happens to the cost of those drugs?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128773 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

You think Canada's govt pushes shite drugs on their citizens knowingly? Or that they would simply pass on the shite drugs to the US


You were suffering from the misunderstanding that a Canadian pharmacy shipping meds to the United States would be medicine from Canada.
Posted by LSU Tiger Bob
South
Member since Sep 2011
3111 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

Let you in on a litle secret. Those drugs that everyone is SOOOOOO worried about the safety of.......they buy them from the same guys that Walgreens, CVS or any of the independents in the US buys them from.


This is what I thought. Canada just tells them they can't charge exorbitant prices. The US does the R&D Canada just buys the stuff.
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 3:36 pm to
I've said that this likely doesn't make an actual change in prices. That is beside the point.
Posted by AjaxFury
In & out of The Matrix
Member since Sep 2014
9928 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

This is what I thought. Canada just tells them they can't charge exorbitant prices. The US does the R&D Canada just buys the stuff.


So basically they want the US consumer to foot the entire bill for R&D , even though the rest of the world benefits from the fruits of our labor? Seems fair
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128773 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 3:37 pm to
If people want to lower drug costs,
1) stop taking unnecessary drugs
2) go for a walk once in a while
3) stop eating McDonald's
4) petition Congress to ditch AWP
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128773 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 3:38 pm to
If you need a straight line, just obtain two data points.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128773 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

I've said that this likely doesn't make an actual change in prices. That is beside the point.


In this argument, it's the whole point. The argument is being made through a moral appeal. If that moral appeal is actually false, The whole argument collapses.
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8641 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

If people want to lower drug costs,
1) stop taking unnecessary drugs
2) go for a walk once in a while
3) stop eating McDonald's
4) petition Congress to ditch AWP


5) Concerted attack on other healthcare systems to start paying up for R&D. Pharma margins have been high in recent years - between 15 and 20% - but nowhere near enough to justify a 5X or 6X difference in wholesale price like you see between other OECD countries and the U.S. God help me, I don't like the guy, but this is an area where Trump's rhetoric and approach can actually work.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram