- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Reparations a complete waste of campaign time: 5th Amendment
Posted on 7/31/19 at 1:37 pm to Ag Zwin
Posted on 7/31/19 at 1:37 pm to Ag Zwin
The 5th would not apply, because they are not talking about coming to the homes of white folks and taking their money or their stuff. They are talking about spending public funds.
Reparations 150 years later is a stupid concept, but lets do try to stick to reality.
Reparations 150 years later is a stupid concept, but lets do try to stick to reality.
Posted on 7/31/19 at 1:42 pm to ShortyRob
quote:Can you link the source of these stats? I am skeptical
In 2013, about 9% of blacks who were in America were foreign born. Contemplate that. Almost 1 in 10 blacks in America in 2013 were FOREIGN BORN!
Quite obviously, their children also won't be "descendants of slavery".
So, right off the bat, that almost certainly brings you over 10%. And, that's probably being conservative given that in the year 2000, 6.7% were foreign born and, ya gotta assume in the intervening 13 years, they had some babies.
In NYC, 28% of blacks were foreign born in 2013! In Miami, 34%.
It would be a shite show extraordinaire if they tried to restrict reparations to only those who were descended from slaves.
Based on the above numbers, it's pretty evident that a VERY significant number of blacks have no connection whatsoever.
This post was edited on 7/31/19 at 1:44 pm
Posted on 7/31/19 at 1:46 pm to AggieHank86
Posted on 7/31/19 at 1:48 pm to Ag Zwin
It will be like a complete fraud like the BP Claims and everybody will be getting them.
Posted on 7/31/19 at 1:48 pm to ShortyRob
quote:Only if none of them marry US-native blacks.
If almost 10 are foreign born NOW.........and almost 7% were foreign born in 2000. This means that ALL of THEIR descendants will be "US Born" but quite obviously, NOT descended from slaves.
Posted on 7/31/19 at 1:49 pm to ShortyRob
OK, so they defined the term as any mixed race person claiming any percentage of black ancestry. I can buy that.
Posted on 7/31/19 at 1:51 pm to AggieHank86
quote:Already pointed out and acknowledged.
Only if none of them marry US-native blacks.
Which led me to my post that started to find it downright amusing.
Because that brings us to the whole fractional situation.
IE, there are friggin whites who meet the "descended from slaves" standard if we're gonna go that route! Which, of course, means that you basically end up engaged in shite show of "how much counts as descended"
Posted on 7/31/19 at 1:52 pm to AggieHank86
quote:Oh come now Hank. Surely you know that I don't carry shite to the board so lazy as to not have read the whole thing.
OK, so they defined the term as any mixed race person claiming any percentage of black ancestry. I can buy that.
quote:
The terms “black immigrants” and “foreign-born blacks” are used interchangeably throughout the report and refer to persons who were both born outside the United States, Puerto Rico or other U.S. territories and whose race is black or is mixed-race black, regardless of Hispanic origin, in 2000 and later U.S. Census Bureau surveys. For previous census years (1980 and 1990), “black immigrants” or “foreign-born blacks” refer to persons born outside the U.S., Puerto Rico or other U.S. territories whose race is black, regardless of Hispanic origin. Prior to 2000, respondents to Census Bureau surveys and its decennial census could make only one selection in the race question. In 2000 and later, respondents were able to indicate they were of more than once race. Immigrant population estimates include all immigrants regardless of citizenship or legal status. “U.S. born” refers to those who are U.S. citizens at birth, namely people born in the U.S., Puerto Rico or other U.S. territories and those born abroad to at least one parent who was a U.S. citizen.
This post was edited on 7/31/19 at 1:54 pm
Posted on 7/31/19 at 1:54 pm to Ag Zwin
If reparations becomes a thing I will immediately Identify as a Strong Black Woman.
Posted on 7/31/19 at 3:03 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Legally you could frame it as anyone who is a descendant if someone was legallly held in slavery in the US
We both know that there is nothing that simple in a legal sense. If the law worked that way we wouldn't need lawyers at the level we have them. Everything is interpretation, precedence, and exclusions. For example:
If the only slave owner in someones family is one set of their great-great-paternal grandparents. Does that mean they only pay 6.7% of this arbitrary sum that congress would come up with?
Is there a discount, like if the above person also had a great-great-maternal grandparent that was owned? Would they be entitled to a 3.3% deduction of that sum? Or would they only receive 3.3% of the reparations?
Both examples could go both ways.
Also, is this not akin to punishing the son for the sins of the father? I'm not talking paying debts with estate prior to distribution. I'm talking going after the middle aged son, 20 years later, of a murderer that committed suicide prior to conviction. Can we take civil judgement against the wealth he has amassed on his own or put him in jail to serve his fathers sentence?
Reparations are in no way legal and there is no "frame" work that could make the simple, just, fair, or impossible to manipulate. This is a fake cry for support to get people behind them with a promise that can not be made, let alone kept.
Posted on 7/31/19 at 3:09 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
I am lilly white. I have a single West African ancestor who was sold into slavery in the US in the late 1700s. I would wager that there are tens of millions of white people in the US who have some degree of mixed ancestry.
How much money do you intend to give me?
Could you imagine the melts if some lily white people with slave ancestors ended up getting paid while some blacks didn’t?
The more I think about it the more I’m in favor of reparations to anyone who can prove at least one slave ancestor. Watching the results would be fantastic. Hell, the government already wastes trillions. At least with this I’d get some amusement.
It just occurred to me that since I have a slave ancestor, and Obama's family were slave owners, I'm entitled to his fricking money.
Posted on 7/31/19 at 3:11 pm to Ag Zwin
Not going to read all this now, will be back.
My second amendment will guarantee that when this government pushes it too far with this chit I will not go quite. I have nothing to lose at that point so game on.
They can take lead instead of my property and hard work.
F'ck them.
My second amendment will guarantee that when this government pushes it too far with this chit I will not go quite. I have nothing to lose at that point so game on.
They can take lead instead of my property and hard work.
F'ck them.
Posted on 7/31/19 at 3:13 pm to ShortyRob
Don't even use logic with a progtard, they cannot fathom anything but feels.
Posted on 7/31/19 at 3:17 pm to SammyTiger
Who cares, ask them one question.....
Would you like to go back to Africa, any country you choose with 100 K or stay in the USA?
100 K is a bargain to get rid of these race roaches in my opinion. Same goes for the super white liberal turds, send them to where ever.
Would you like to go back to Africa, any country you choose with 100 K or stay in the USA?
100 K is a bargain to get rid of these race roaches in my opinion. Same goes for the super white liberal turds, send them to where ever.
Posted on 7/31/19 at 3:35 pm to ShortyRob
Exactly
It will a hoisted by their own petard moment. A big sect will get screwed over and we all know how money makes people act.
Then others will start asking for theirs...
It will a hoisted by their own petard moment. A big sect will get screwed over and we all know how money makes people act.
Then others will start asking for theirs...
Posted on 7/31/19 at 3:40 pm to ShortyRob
While I agree with most of your post and the substance you provide with it.
Not really obvious. This statement assumes they either marry / reproduced with only other foreign born (since the end of slavery). If they reproduce with someone that is an ancestor of a slave, then the kids would be. But that brings up my previous post of how do you prorate these reparations?
quote:
Quite obviously, their children also won't be "descendants of slavery".
Not really obvious. This statement assumes they either marry / reproduced with only other foreign born (since the end of slavery). If they reproduce with someone that is an ancestor of a slave, then the kids would be. But that brings up my previous post of how do you prorate these reparations?
Posted on 7/31/19 at 3:58 pm to The Rodfather
quote:
Not really obvious. This statement assumes they either marry / reproduced with only other foreign born
Already noted and acknowledged
In fact. It created a new angle of amusement. Read further
I expand on your proration issue
This post was edited on 7/31/19 at 3:59 pm
Posted on 7/31/19 at 4:54 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Legally you could frame it as anyone who is a descendant if someone was legallly held in slavery in the US
Are you going to DNA every possible person. You can't guarantee maternal bloodlines and you certainly can't paternal, without DNA.
Posted on 7/31/19 at 5:22 pm to Gus007
So on the census should we all identify as black so we can get our check?
Posted on 7/31/19 at 5:31 pm to Gus007
I would Probably just do birth records. TBH
Some Genealogists will get rich.
Some Genealogists will get rich.
This post was edited on 7/31/19 at 5:32 pm
Popular
Back to top



0




