Started By
Message

re: Reparations a complete waste of campaign time: 5th Amendment

Posted on 7/31/19 at 1:37 pm to
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 7/31/19 at 1:37 pm to
The 5th would not apply, because they are not talking about coming to the homes of white folks and taking their money or their stuff. They are talking about spending public funds.

Reparations 150 years later is a stupid concept, but lets do try to stick to reality.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 7/31/19 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

In 2013, about 9% of blacks who were in America were foreign born. Contemplate that. Almost 1 in 10 blacks in America in 2013 were FOREIGN BORN!

Quite obviously, their children also won't be "descendants of slavery".

So, right off the bat, that almost certainly brings you over 10%. And, that's probably being conservative given that in the year 2000, 6.7% were foreign born and, ya gotta assume in the intervening 13 years, they had some babies.

In NYC, 28% of blacks were foreign born in 2013! In Miami, 34%.

It would be a shite show extraordinaire if they tried to restrict reparations to only those who were descended from slaves.

Based on the above numbers, it's pretty evident that a VERY significant number of blacks have no connection whatsoever.

Can you link the source of these stats? I am skeptical
This post was edited on 7/31/19 at 1:44 pm
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 7/31/19 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

Can you link the source of these stats? I am skeptical



LINK
Posted by lsu13lsu
Member since Jan 2008
11764 posts
Posted on 7/31/19 at 1:48 pm to
It will be like a complete fraud like the BP Claims and everybody will be getting them.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 7/31/19 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

If almost 10 are foreign born NOW.........and almost 7% were foreign born in 2000. This means that ALL of THEIR descendants will be "US Born" but quite obviously, NOT descended from slaves.
Only if none of them marry US-native blacks.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 7/31/19 at 1:49 pm to
OK, so they defined the term as any mixed race person claiming any percentage of black ancestry. I can buy that.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 7/31/19 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

Only if none of them marry US-native blacks.

Already pointed out and acknowledged.

Which led me to my post that started to find it downright amusing.

Because that brings us to the whole fractional situation.

IE, there are friggin whites who meet the "descended from slaves" standard if we're gonna go that route! Which, of course, means that you basically end up engaged in shite show of "how much counts as descended"
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 7/31/19 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

OK, so they defined the term as any mixed race person claiming any percentage of black ancestry. I can buy that.

Oh come now Hank. Surely you know that I don't carry shite to the board so lazy as to not have read the whole thing.

quote:

The terms “black immigrants” and “foreign-born blacks” are used interchangeably throughout the report and refer to persons who were both born outside the United States, Puerto Rico or other U.S. territories and whose race is black or is mixed-race black, regardless of Hispanic origin, in 2000 and later U.S. Census Bureau surveys. For previous census years (1980 and 1990), “black immigrants” or “foreign-born blacks” refer to persons born outside the U.S., Puerto Rico or other U.S. territories whose race is black, regardless of Hispanic origin. Prior to 2000, respondents to Census Bureau surveys and its decennial census could make only one selection in the race question. In 2000 and later, respondents were able to indicate they were of more than once race. Immigrant population estimates include all immigrants regardless of citizenship or legal status. “U.S. born” refers to those who are U.S. citizens at birth, namely people born in the U.S., Puerto Rico or other U.S. territories and those born abroad to at least one parent who was a U.S. citizen.
This post was edited on 7/31/19 at 1:54 pm
Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George, LA
Member since Aug 2004
80409 posts
Posted on 7/31/19 at 1:54 pm to
If reparations becomes a thing I will immediately Identify as a Strong Black Woman.

Posted by The Rodfather
I'm not really sure?
Member since Nov 2008
3941 posts
Posted on 7/31/19 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Legally you could frame it as anyone who is a descendant if someone was legallly held in slavery in the US


We both know that there is nothing that simple in a legal sense. If the law worked that way we wouldn't need lawyers at the level we have them. Everything is interpretation, precedence, and exclusions. For example:

If the only slave owner in someones family is one set of their great-great-paternal grandparents. Does that mean they only pay 6.7% of this arbitrary sum that congress would come up with?

Is there a discount, like if the above person also had a great-great-maternal grandparent that was owned? Would they be entitled to a 3.3% deduction of that sum? Or would they only receive 3.3% of the reparations?

Both examples could go both ways.

Also, is this not akin to punishing the son for the sins of the father? I'm not talking paying debts with estate prior to distribution. I'm talking going after the middle aged son, 20 years later, of a murderer that committed suicide prior to conviction. Can we take civil judgement against the wealth he has amassed on his own or put him in jail to serve his fathers sentence?

Reparations are in no way legal and there is no "frame" work that could make the simple, just, fair, or impossible to manipulate. This is a fake cry for support to get people behind them with a promise that can not be made, let alone kept.
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
23105 posts
Posted on 7/31/19 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

I am lilly white. I have a single West African ancestor who was sold into slavery in the US in the late 1700s. I would wager that there are tens of millions of white people in the US who have some degree of mixed ancestry.

How much money do you intend to give me?


Could you imagine the melts if some lily white people with slave ancestors ended up getting paid while some blacks didn’t?

The more I think about it the more I’m in favor of reparations to anyone who can prove at least one slave ancestor. Watching the results would be fantastic. Hell, the government already wastes trillions. At least with this I’d get some amusement.




It just occurred to me that since I have a slave ancestor, and Obama's family were slave owners, I'm entitled to his fricking money.
Posted by RTM4
Pflugerville
Member since Apr 2018
2281 posts
Posted on 7/31/19 at 3:11 pm to
Not going to read all this now, will be back.

My second amendment will guarantee that when this government pushes it too far with this chit I will not go quite. I have nothing to lose at that point so game on.

They can take lead instead of my property and hard work.

F'ck them.
Posted by RTM4
Pflugerville
Member since Apr 2018
2281 posts
Posted on 7/31/19 at 3:13 pm to
Don't even use logic with a progtard, they cannot fathom anything but feels.
Posted by RTM4
Pflugerville
Member since Apr 2018
2281 posts
Posted on 7/31/19 at 3:17 pm to
Who cares, ask them one question.....

Would you like to go back to Africa, any country you choose with 100 K or stay in the USA?

100 K is a bargain to get rid of these race roaches in my opinion. Same goes for the super white liberal turds, send them to where ever.
Posted by LosLobos111
Austere
Member since Feb 2011
45385 posts
Posted on 7/31/19 at 3:35 pm to
Exactly

It will a hoisted by their own petard moment. A big sect will get screwed over and we all know how money makes people act.

Then others will start asking for theirs...
Posted by The Rodfather
I'm not really sure?
Member since Nov 2008
3941 posts
Posted on 7/31/19 at 3:40 pm to
While I agree with most of your post and the substance you provide with it.


quote:

Quite obviously, their children also won't be "descendants of slavery".

Not really obvious. This statement assumes they either marry / reproduced with only other foreign born (since the end of slavery). If they reproduce with someone that is an ancestor of a slave, then the kids would be. But that brings up my previous post of how do you prorate these reparations?
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 7/31/19 at 3:58 pm to
quote:


Not really obvious. This statement assumes they either marry / reproduced with only other foreign born

Already noted and acknowledged

In fact. It created a new angle of amusement. Read further

I expand on your proration issue
This post was edited on 7/31/19 at 3:59 pm
Posted by Gus007
TN
Member since Jul 2018
14047 posts
Posted on 7/31/19 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

Legally you could frame it as anyone who is a descendant if someone was legallly held in slavery in the US



Are you going to DNA every possible person. You can't guarantee maternal bloodlines and you certainly can't paternal, without DNA.
Posted by SOSFAN
Blythewood
Member since Jun 2018
14974 posts
Posted on 7/31/19 at 5:22 pm to
So on the census should we all identify as black so we can get our check?
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78159 posts
Posted on 7/31/19 at 5:31 pm to
I would Probably just do birth records. TBH

Some Genealogists will get rich.
This post was edited on 7/31/19 at 5:32 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram