Started By
Message

re: Renee Good’s wife claimed Minneapolis shooting was ‘my fault’ in video

Posted on 1/9/26 at 8:59 am to
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
86175 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 8:59 am to
quote:

She was a trained and funded domestic terrorist.


Let's talk about this. Is someone who OBSTRUCTS, a terrorist? Fair question, right? She's certainly committing crimes, and she is certainly part of a criminal conspiracy, but is SHE the "terrorist"? I would push back on that because I think we need to be precise with words, because our rabid opponent is not, and it makes us the adult in the room.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
39719 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:02 am to
“ They aren't her kids and she had been arrested earlier for putting cigarette butts out on said kids. Good's parents will likely (thankfully) get said kids as they have been battling for custody.”(quote H).

OMG, Houg, this ruined my morning. If true, for the sake of those innocents this tragedy was a Godsend.

As the Satanic influence is loosed upon our people I truly fear what we will see and how it will affect us. We’d better hope and pray that the Comforter does its job, and that we don’t abandon the Faith that makes it real. I’ll be damned lucky to hang on.

I feel totally different about the whole scenario now. Thanks for the info.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35945 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:04 am to
quote:

They aren't her kids and she had been arrested earlier for putting cigarette butts out on said kids.


Link? I’d love to see this
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59474 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:06 am to
quote:

Are you serious right now? That’s just dumb. If you want to argue that then every single person in the bar is guilty if one person leaves and kills someone in a DUI wreck


Horrible analogy.
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49420 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:07 am to
quote:

Let's talk about this. Is someone who OBSTRUCTS, a terrorist? Fair question, right? She's certainly committing crimes, and she is certainly part of a criminal conspiracy, but is SHE the "terrorist"? I would push back on that because I think we need to be precise with words, because our rabid opponent is not, and it makes us the adult in the room.


I would argue that true terrorism requires a level of intent and focus.

This woman was just an overly emotional basket case with a faux-hero complex.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59474 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:07 am to
quote:

Well, I sure hope she had all her papers while traveling the public streets of Amerika.


She used her car as a weapon, you moron.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59474 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:08 am to
quote:

your emotionally charged opinions


Oh my. Your lack of self-awareness is staggering.
Posted by TFH
Member since Apr 2016
4233 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:10 am to
quote:

Horrible analogy.

You say that but can’t defend it.

How is the wife an accessory? What did she do to facilitate the crime? Talked her into being there?
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59474 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:10 am to
quote:

Oh they planned to attempt to run over a federal agent? Then we got em dead bang on conspiracy charges too! I hope you’re trolling and not this ignorant


No. They planned to feloniously obstruct and she was killed in the process. Textbook felony murder. You shouldn’t be calling anyone ignorant.
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
86175 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:11 am to
Agreed. Tim Pool talks about this all the time-how their handlers (the real terrorists) use the Useful Idiots and classify them into green-yellow-red. And the point is to NOT tell them the law-to lie about it-make them feel self-righteous and like untouchable crusaders. Then when they get consequences-their head cracked or a month in jail-it hardens them and radicalizes them. They are absolute emotionally driven, limited perspective PAWNS. The organizer is the terrorist.
Posted by TFH
Member since Apr 2016
4233 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:12 am to
quote:

They planned to feloniously obstruct and she was killed in the process. Textbook felony murder. You shouldn’t be calling anyone ignorant.

Tell me how that’s accessory.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59474 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:12 am to
quote:

Okay lets play.. Biden admin let in 20 million illegal immigrants, criminals etc. into this country unvetted.. This is the genesis of how we got to where we are today. This is WRONG.. Do you disagree?


He is gone. You won’t get an answer.
Posted by Don Quixote
Member since May 2023
5035 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:12 am to
good then charger has as an accomplice
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
39349 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:16 am to
quote:

Trump has really trained his cult well. You no longer care about right or wrong, your emotionally charged opinions are solely based on left vs. right.
quote:

Oh frick off.
The entire left is lying about this story
Thanks for illustrating my point.
Posted by TFH
Member since Apr 2016
4233 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:17 am to
“ An accessory to murder is someone who knowingly helps another person before or after a murder is committed, but isn't the primary killer, often by aiding in planning, providing tools (like a weapon or getaway car), helping the killer escape, hiding evidence, or offering a false alibi. This differs from an accomplice, who usually participates directly at the crime scene. Charges fall into "accessory before the fact" (planning/preparation) or "accessory after the fact" (helping escape/conceal) and are serious felonies with severe penalties, potentially similar to the murder itself. ”


“ A murder charge in the commission of a felony, known as the Felony Murder Rule, means anyone involved in a dangerous felony (like robbery, arson, rape, kidnapping) can be charged with murder if someone dies during the crime, even without intent to kill. The rule holds participants strictly liable for any resulting death, applying even if accidental or caused by someone else (like a victim or police), with intent to commit the underlying felony being sufficient for a murder conviction. States vary in which felonies qualify and how the rule applies, with some focusing on inherently dangerous crimes and others having specific lists. ”



Very different things, baw

Posted by riccoar
Arkansas
Member since Mar 2006
5136 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:17 am to
Ultimately this is the fault of the Democratic Party.

The Democratic Party knows each Illegally let in Illegal Alien is a vote lost. Therefore they have convinced all these brain dead lemmings to interrupt and block Lawful LEGAL LEO operations to remove these people from the US who shouldn't be here in the first place.

This lady is not a martyr, but a simple criminal much like George Floyd. Both were solely responsible for their deaths.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
35572 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:18 am to
quote:

Let's talk about this. Is someone who OBSTRUCTS, a terrorist?


If you commit violent crime in furtherance of a political objective, you are a terrorist.

Attempting to run over a federal agent to stop him from arresting illegals is just that.
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49420 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:18 am to
quote:

How is the wife an accessory? What did she do to facilitate the crime? Talked her into being there?


Giving her every benefit of the doubt, it may still be second-degree felony murder under Minnesota law. Obstructing federal officer during the commission of a legal exercise is a felony under 18 USC 111. This also includes accessory and assistance to one obstructing the legal exercise. So she could be charged here with a felony.

Once it is shown that she committed the felony, all Minnesota's second-degree felony murder statute requires is a showing that another person died during the commission of the felony. Intent is irrelevant.

This post was edited on 1/9/26 at 9:20 am
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
35572 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:20 am to
quote:

How is the wife an accessory? What did she do to facilitate the crime? Talked her into being there?


They traveled to the scene together with the intention of committing a crime. Just the blocking of the road is a crime. It escalated to something worse.

If you travel with someone to rob a convenience store and you stay in the car as the driver and someone is killed, you can be charged with murder.
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
39349 posts
Posted on 1/9/26 at 9:26 am to
quote:

Well, I sure hope she had all her papers while traveling the public streets of Amerika.



She used her car as a weapon, you moron.
So driving your car is considered using it as a deadly weapon. That's a slippery slope you cultists need to back off of.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram