- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Remember when just the swing states simultaneously went to take a smoke break in 2020?
Posted on 8/26/23 at 10:13 am to FlexDawg
Posted on 8/26/23 at 10:13 am to FlexDawg
I'm done pissing and moaning over an extremely suspicious 2020 GE....the Dims/Groomers executed a mass mail in and Zuckerbox ballot harvesting operation. Many of those harvested ballots had little to no chain of custody, yes the Dims cheated fair and square, Republicans got worked.
I've always contended it would be better if the 2020 GE were rigged vs 81 million Americans truly voting for Biden. It's possible to tighten up voting processes and procedures to minimize election irregularities/shenanigans but trying to deprogram tens of millions of Americans from the 24/7/364 Gaslight Media propaganda and academia indoctrination is a much tougher nut to crack.
I've always contended it would be better if the 2020 GE were rigged vs 81 million Americans truly voting for Biden. It's possible to tighten up voting processes and procedures to minimize election irregularities/shenanigans but trying to deprogram tens of millions of Americans from the 24/7/364 Gaslight Media propaganda and academia indoctrination is a much tougher nut to crack.
0
Posted on 8/26/23 at 10:16 am to jbdawgs03
What's friggin funny is them all going back and bumping old threads.
So desperate.
So desperate.
Posted on 8/26/23 at 10:19 am to Gifman
quote:Won't happen because Republicans know they will get thrown in jail if they do anything close to what democrats have done
Unless state legislatures in swing states become interested in running ethical elections, then republicans need to cheat hard or they’re not interested in winning.
The Georgia indictment is basically telling everyone don't even think about trying anything again if you are a republican you have to bend over and take it
Posted on 8/26/23 at 12:31 pm to CelticDog
quote:Let’s use that figure. It’s about a 28% increase in OP’s average voter turnout of 62.5%.
80% of registered voters in California voted 2020.
OP’s contention was with a statistically improbable increase of registered voters as high as 25% Joe Biden’s 81,000,000 votes were inexplicable.
•Reuters’s 153,000,000 was used as an accurate number of registered voters. A 25% increase is about 191,250,000 total registered voters in 2020.
• If there was an across the board turnout in 2020 like California of 80% then, ironically, 153,000,000 voted, or, 100% of Reuters’s total registered voters.
• Of that number, President Trump received 74,000,000 leaving Joe Biden with only 79,000,000. Close, but no cigar.
Impossibilities have to be accepted to justify Joe Biden’s winning the 2020 popular vote.
Posted on 8/26/23 at 2:09 pm to keks tadpole
quote:
What’s your take on the Atlanta election staff pulling crates from under a covered table and running paper thru what appears to be a vote tabulator, several times, after a water pipe burst and flooded the building?
He takes it as a win.
He's a shameless democrat with zero integrity.
By
Any
Means
Necessary
Posted on 8/26/23 at 2:30 pm to Powerman
What’s it like siding with immorality?
Posted on 8/26/23 at 4:30 pm to texridder
quote:
Your thinking I am a radical leftist simply because I don't buy into the alt-right hair brain theories on here shows how clueless you actually are
You’re accurately identified because all you do is attack right leaning content whether it’s far right or not. You push left leaning content, so not sure what you’re trying to prove with one post. You’re exposed by the thousands that we have seen. Just own your suck.
Posted on 8/26/23 at 4:58 pm to Mr. Misanthrope
quote:
ironically, 153,000,000 voted, or, 100% of Reuters’s total registered voters.
did you go to each STATE and see whether Reuters erred? it would be easy if your Reuters data is by state.
also, its unlikely 80% voted in most states.
70% is probably closer.
edit. looked some of it up.
66% of registered voters bothered.
158 million out of 240 million.
that is not reuters 153.
This post was edited on 8/26/23 at 5:04 pm
Posted on 8/26/23 at 5:35 pm to FlexDawg
Sad that 25 bitches downvoted this post…lmao!
Posted on 8/27/23 at 12:37 am to CelticDog
quote:
did you go to each STATE and see whether Reuters erred? it would be easy if your Reuters data is by state.
also, its unlikely 80% voted in most states. 70% is probably closer.
edit. looked some of it up.
66% of registered voters bothered.
158 million out of 240 million. that is not reuters 153.
I’m not clear about what point you’re making. The Reuters’s number of 153,000,000 was OP’s. 80% voter turnout was your’s referencing California. I used his Reuters’s number and your’s to work the numbers to explore the OP’s original point that Joe Biden’s 81,000,000 was suspect.
Are you now saying 2020 registered voters should be 158,000,000 and average voter turnout should be 66%? Okay, then the OP’s 25% increase in registered voters would be 197,500,000 voters participating in 2020 and roughly 66%, 130,330,000 turned out to cast their ballots. 74,000,000 voted for President Trump. That leaves 56,330,000 votes for Joe Biden. Not 81,000,000. Where did nearly 30,000,000 votes come from to raise Joe Biden’s popular vote count?
Posted on 8/27/23 at 12:42 am to Mr. Misanthrope
I think you severely underestimate the anti Trump sentiment. I'd argue that neither candidates vote totals sound believable
Posted on 8/28/23 at 6:28 pm to OceanMan
quote:
Took you 8 months to come up with that?
First, I've already posted that a minimum of 5 times.
Second, why didn't you respond to the substance of the post? Nothing to say?
Posted on 8/29/23 at 12:42 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
You’re accurately identified because all you do is attack right leaning content whether it’s far right or not.
I attack right leaning inaccurate, ignoant, horseshite content in all shapes and sizes.
Posted on 8/29/23 at 6:03 am to texridder
I’ll give you one and it’s anecdotal because I would have to go pull the article.
Numerous mail in ballots only had Biden marked and nothing marked down ballot. Certain batches consisted of over 95% done this way. That is a statistical impossibility.
Numerous mail in ballots only had Biden marked and nothing marked down ballot. Certain batches consisted of over 95% done this way. That is a statistical impossibility.
Posted on 8/29/23 at 6:09 am to WylieTiger
And what's your purpose for doing so?
Posted on 8/29/23 at 6:11 am to Densla
quote:
Someone explained this to me: A Little Math about The Big Lie
The Left insists that Biden got 81 million votes in 2020, although that number is widely disputed.
No one, however, disputes that Trump got 74 million votes. Which is more than any sitting president in history, or for that matter any other candidate in any election ever in the US prior to 2020. Trump’s 74 million is a record, which may never be broken again.
Adding Trump’s legit 74 million and Biden’s purported 81 million gives us a grand total of 155 million votes cast in the 2020 election. But how realistic is that figure, really?
Well, we just don’t know how many registered voters there actually were in the US for the 2020 election, at least according to Leftist sources. But Reuters is on the record that there were only 153 million registered voters in 2018.
The average voter turnout is usually around 62.5%.
If we only had 153 million voters in 2020 and the usual 62.5% actually went to the polls, that would mean that only 95 million votes were cast in 2020, and we know that Trump got 74 million of them. So Biden would have only received 21 million votes in 2020, or just 22% of the vote.
But wait. Let’s imagine for the sake of argument that the number of registered voters increased a whopping 25% between 2018 and 2020, something that has never happened before. In that case, there would have been 191 million registered voters, and 62.5% of 191 million is 119 million. Take away Trump’s 74 million, and Biden is still left with just 45 million votes, just about half of what the Left says he got in 2020.
Ok, let’s stretch the bounds of probability even more, and speculate that the number of registered voters increased 50% between 2018 and 2020. It could never happen, but let’s pretend anyway, just for the sake of argument. That would mean that there would have been 230 million registered voters in 2020, and 62.5% of that number would be 149 million votes in the 2020 election. Take away Trump’s 74 million, and that still only leaves 75 million votes left over for Biden, still not even close to the claimed 81 million.
In order for Biden to have actually received 81 million votes, there had to be 155 million votes in that election. And in order for the normal 61.5% of registered voters to have voted, that means that there had to be a total of 250 million registered voters in the 2020 election. Which means that the number of registered voters went up from 153 million in 2018 to 250 million in 2020, which would be an impossible 67% increase in registered voters from 2018 to 2020.
First off there are probably about 3 dozen presidents who can claim they got the most votes for an incumbent president for one very simple reason. The population of the US is continually growing making it inevitable that the next vote will have more people.
Next, voter turnout is not based on the percentage of registered voters who cast ballots, it's based on the percentage of "eligible" voters (240-250 million) who 'can' cast ballots if they register.
That invalidates all math in the latter half of your post because you confuse registered voters with eligible voters when calculating turnout.
To help you understand.
2016 registered voters: 157.6m
Voter turnout: 54.8%
Voting eligible population: 235m
Trump: 62.98m
Hillary: 65.85m
Total votes 128.83m
81.7% of registered voters voted.
54.8% of eligible voters voted.
This post was edited on 8/29/23 at 6:21 am
Posted on 8/29/23 at 6:16 am to Mr. Misanthrope
quote:
I’m not clear about what point you’re making. The Reuters’s number of 153,000,000 was OP’s. 80% voter turnout was your’s referencing California. I used his Reuters’s number and your’s to work the numbers to explore the OP’s original point that Joe Biden’s 81,000,000 was suspect.
Are you now saying 2020 registered voters should be 158,000,000 and average voter turnout should be 66%? Okay, then the OP’s 25% increase in registered voters would be 197,500,000 voters participating in 2020 and roughly 66%, 130,330,000 turned out to cast their ballots. 74,000,000 voted for President Trump. That leaves 56,330,000 votes for Joe Biden. Not 81,000,000. Where did nearly 30,000,000 votes come from to raise Joe Biden’s popular vote count?
Same flaw as other poster's math. Voter turnout uses eligible voters not registered voters.
It's intended to be a gauge of how politically engaged a population is by comparing those who voted against those who were eligible to vote.
Posted on 8/29/23 at 7:50 am to tango029
quote:
registered voters should be 158,000,000
no
Posted on 8/29/23 at 8:12 am to CelticDog
Reuters posted a disclaimer of the op.
says they used the wrong numbers.
they even refer to this specific thread idea.
its bogus.
says they used the wrong numbers.
they even refer to this specific thread idea.
its bogus.
Page 15 of 21
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News