re: Religious Leaders Told to 'Prepare Now' for UFO Disclosure and 'Bible-Changing' Revelation

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

---

David Grusch just said out loud what a lot of people have been thinking in private. The decorated intelligence officer who told Congress about UAP crash retrieval programs has gone on record warning that calling these things demonic is, in his exact words, "very dangerous language."

Grusch names VP Vance and Tucker Carlson as people actively discussing the demon theory. He confirms he's had private conversations with Carlson directly on the subject. Then he draws a line: labeling UAPs as demons before humanity understands the full scope of God's creation is theologically premature and potentially catastrophic thinking.

His framework is striking. As a practicing Catholic, he argues God created a visible and invisible order that includes, quote, "other types of non-human intelligence." His position is that humans don't yet have the theological tools to classify what these things are.

This is a man with clearances most people can't imagine, telling the world to slow down before it decides the unknown is evil.

Are UAPs demons, something else in God's creation entirely, or is the religious framing itself the real danger here?

---

quote:

---

I agree. “By their fruits ye will know them”.

---

Right. And as Burlison was saying, "they could wipe us out in an instant. But they haven't."

I would imagine they are more concerned with the overall welfare of this biosphere than us. They don't seem to like nukes.

Meaning, that although they haven't wiped us out to date, I wouldn't assume they won't in the future if they deem it necessary.

Just watched the end of the NC/SC game. One strike and SC goes to Omaha for the first time in a quarter century. Dude slams his 4th Double. And passions red line.

This kind of drama only happens in this particularly and unique realm of evolutionary progression. If I was an immortal alien and could mine the feelings and passion thereof, I would.

Congrats and thanks to both the winners and ‘losers’.

quote:

---

You sure wrote a load of horseshite.

---

Thanks for your input, random internet user. Now kindly frick off.

quote:

---

Christianity didn’t spring from Pharisee Judaism. It sprang from obscure sects of Israelite religion that never died off. Is why Clement of Rome quoted Deuteronomy 32:8-9 in his epistle to the Corinthians. It was very important that the father god El Elyon assigned his most unique special son Yahweh the nation of Israel......

---

Gee, I never realized I was such a simpleton. I always thought Christianity came forth from the following of Jesus Christ. I guess I'm just not so sophisticated.

Man, are you barking up the wrong tree up in here. You're like some people I went to school with that were really smart in school, but really dumb on the bus. Have a good life.

You got a demon riding you. Good luck with that.

quote:

---

Jesus never said that. He said the opposite.

---

Paul had no idea or knowledge of the earthly Jesus or what he would have said if he really existed as a man on earth. Paul is very explicit that what he learned of Jesus was only learned after Jesus’ death, resurrection, and exaltation and that he only learned of it through scripture and direct revelation. He explicitly stated “this is not man’s gospel” - he didn’t learn of Jesus through word of mouth through other people.

Here is the reality. Paul wrote before the legends of the historical Jesus were ginned up. Take “the gospel according to Matthew” for instance - that directly rebuked Pauline theology, with things like not everyone who says Lord Lord to me (Jesus) will enter the kingdom but those that do the father’s will, and the author directly rebuked Paul’s dismissal of works of the law (eg circumcision) saying all Christians must keep every dot and tittle of the law. So the gospel according to Matthew took Mark as a source text and reworked it to rebuke Pauline theology.

quote:

---

I have trouble believing paulian texts as I feel they were inspired by Jews desiring to separate Jesus's teaching from the Jewish faith at the time.

---

Jesus’ teachings, at the time Paul wrote, were all from the Old Testament material being reinterpreted. There was a real conflict there as evidenced by Paul’s epistles. Paul was constantly fighting against the teachings of the Jewish Christians and always was whining about how the Christians needed to listen to him. Paul was on shaky ground. Many Christians viewed Paul as a charlatan. If the fake history of Acts were true, Paul could have used the letter (Acts 15:22-29) instead of whining and begging the Corinthians and Galatians and so forth to quit cutting off their foreskin.

quote:

---

They wanted to cut off the Jews who believed in Jesus's teachings and segregate them into another religion entirely so they could not claim status as God's favorite people.

---

The big separation occurred naturally after 70CE. After the Jews got curb stomped, the Romans were punishing the Jews and the Christians around the empire wanted to disassociate so as to avoid the consequences.

quote:

---

So, they sent Paul who claimed that circumcision wasn't necessary, all of the old rules didn't need need to be followed because Jesus made a new thing

---

“They” didn’t send Paul out most likely. Paul went out on his own, according to his own writings, and constantly conflicted with the Jewish Christians. Cutting off dick skin, and not being able to eat pork or shrimp was not a good message to get new recruits to the religion. I think Paul saw this as the only way to spread his gospel to get converts, whether he legitimately believed in their eternal salvation or whether it was a fundraising tool so he could live off the collections.