- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Religious Leaders Told to 'Prepare Now' for UFO Disclosure and 'Bible-Changing' Revelation
Posted on 5/29/26 at 7:48 pm to theunknownknight
Posted on 5/29/26 at 7:48 pm to theunknownknight
I think they're actually hoping people don't care.
Posted on 5/29/26 at 7:53 pm to AlterEd
quote:No, you assume it. It is why you think it is so obvious.
I do not assume it, it very obviously was.
quote:Not at all. I’m explaining exactly why you think your belief is “obvious”. You think chronology is the deciding factor in this because you disregard the supernatural claims of the Bible regarding revelation. You think all stories are equal, and that whichever was written first is the original.
This is gooblegook nonsense. The equivalent of a child putting their thumbs in their ears, saying "na-na-na-na-na-na, I'm rubber you're glue whatever you say bounces off of me and sticks to you."
quote:See above. Chronology of the Hebrew writings is not all there is.
The Sumerians were building civilization while your Hebrew heroes were wiping their asses with their hands and living in tents. They wrote the same stories a full 1,000 years before the Hebrews. The same frickin stories.
Posted on 5/29/26 at 8:01 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
You think chronology is the deciding factor in this because you disregard the supernatural claims of the Bible regarding revelation. You think all stories are equal, and that whichever was written first is the original.
So you're saying the chronological fact that the Sumerians told the story first is discredited because of frickin magic? Ok, back to ignoring your incoherent ramblings. There is no reasoning with someone who will resort to saying they're correct because magic.
Posted on 5/29/26 at 8:21 pm to AlterEd
Still doesn’t change the fact that God “is” and always will be. Aliens? interdimensional Beings? It doesn’t matter —— all created by God.
Posted on 5/29/26 at 8:25 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
That's not what people believe or why they believe it.
People believed this shite for centuries because life expectancy was 30 years and brains aren’t fully developed until age 25.
People are gullible and stupid.
Posted on 5/29/26 at 8:30 pm to Juan Betanzos
Nobody is saying otherwise near as I can tell.
Posted on 5/29/26 at 8:31 pm to JCdawg
That poster is a frickin fool. There is a large number of people out there today who still believe that stupid shite and use the Bible as their reason for believing it.
Posted on 5/29/26 at 9:00 pm to AlterEd
still waiting on the bible changing revelations
Posted on 5/29/26 at 9:47 pm to AlterEd
quote:Magic? No.
So you're saying the chronological fact that the Sumerians told the story first is discredited because of frickin magic?
I’m telling you that just because someone records a story first doesn’t mean that is the original source, or that the details provided are the most accurate.
If God exists, then your naturalistic view may be absolutely unreliable, and I believe it is unreliable.
quote:Not magic.
Ok, back to ignoring your incoherent ramblings. There is no reasoning with someone who will resort to saying they're correct because magic.
Like I said previously, your conclusions are based on a naturalistic worldview. You can’t accept that God exists and may have provided information that is more accurate than the Sumarians did.
Posted on 5/29/26 at 9:51 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
. You can’t accept that God exists and may have provided information that is more accurate than the Sumarians did.
The problem is that there is no evidence in the historical record to support this argument, and there is historical evidence to support his argument.
Just as there is a growing set of evidence that the Israelites were a splinter population of Canaanites and Judaism is a spinoff of the Canaanite religion, combining multiple Canaanite deities into one over time.
There is no line of Jewish believers prior to this development and we have a LOT of record keeping from thousands of years prior to this schism (1200-1000 BC), including Sumerian evidence (as far back as 4500 BC)
Posted on 5/30/26 at 1:00 am to Squirrelmeister
That was very educational. Thank you for the insight. How do we rationalize the transition from many gods to a singular God today? I'd be interested in your perspective from a historical as well as faith if you are up for it.
I think it is important to the overall discussion of how revealing alien life would impact Christian belief.
I think it is important to the overall discussion of how revealing alien life would impact Christian belief.
Posted on 5/30/26 at 6:07 am to 10thyrsr
quote:
I think it is important to the overall discussion of how revealing alien life would impact Christian belief.
There are some subjects so massive they can't be left out of the Bible for the Bible to remain valid.
The argument is that aliens are one of those things.
Posted on 5/30/26 at 6:22 am to AlterEd
quote:
I understand exactly what he was saying.
No you didn’t. You would not have responded the way that you did if you had.
And you are an angry little twat.
Did you read Genesis 12:10-20 by the way, or were you too stubborn to do so?
This post was edited on 5/30/26 at 6:25 am
Posted on 5/30/26 at 9:16 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:The Bible is evidence in the historical record, and there are many evidences in archeology that support the accuracy of the biblical record.
The problem is that there is no evidence in the historical record to support this argument, and there is historical evidence to support his argument.
However, all evidence must be interpreted. Interpretations are impacted by the presuppositions of the one doing the interpreting, so it isn’t quite sufficient to say there is evidence, one way or the other.
Evidentialism is also insufficient to determine the truthfulness of all of the claims of the Bible, since many are based on supernatural events that may not leave evidence, at least not direct evidence that you and others would be looking for. Therefore, your naturalistic worldview biases you against truth claims made from a supernatural background.
quote:You are doing the same thing Ed is. You mistake similarities for dependencies, and therefore evolution. There is much evidence that supports the Israelites being a separate group in Canaan from an early time, such as the Merneptah Stele, which lists them separately from about 1200 BC.
Just as there is a growing set of evidence that the Israelites were a splinter population of Canaanites and Judaism is a spinoff of the Canaanite religion, combining multiple Canaanite deities into one over time.
There is no line of Jewish believers prior to this development and we have a LOT of record keeping from thousands of years prior to this schism (1200-1000 BC), including Sumerian evidence (as far back as 4500 BC)
There were linguistic commonalities and syncretism within the Israelites, and that is seen as development from Canaan tribes, yet those things should be expected from the Biblical text, itself, which sees nearly the entire history of the Israelites as one of turning away from the worship of God alone through intermarrying with the polytheistic tribes around them, adopting idolatrous worship practices, and being punished for it.
I would argue that the documentary hypothesis that undergirds so much atheistic skepticism of the Old Testament is actually what is being abandoned and new secular models are being looked into because the evidence no longer strongly supports the distinct line theory that has dominated since the higher criticism of the 19th century.
Posted on 5/30/26 at 9:24 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:It is a poor argument without further argumentation to support it, which you don’t have. It’s why when we were discussing it earlier, you quickly abandoned the argument as-is and latched on to the concept of aliens being image-bearers of God, because that would actually be impactful to Christianity.
There are some subjects so massive they can't be left out of the Bible for the Bible to remain valid.
The argument is that aliens are one of those things.
We went through this earlier: the existence of alien life by itself impacts no important doctrine of the Christian faith, so your entire argument is based on an arbitrary expectation that important things must always be mentioned by the Bible, as well as the arbitrary designation of what is “important”.
Posted on 5/30/26 at 10:30 am to Mo Jeaux
quote:
No you didn’t. You would not have responded the way that you did if you had.
Jesus you're fricking retarded. Take a look at what I actually said, dipshit.
quote:
Abraham actually came from Sumer, but point taken. That was a recurring theme. Apparently everyone went to Egypt to get rich back in the day
According to the Bible, Abraham was only in Egypt for a little while. But he actually came from Ur.
quote:
Did you read Genesis 12:10-20 by the way, or were you too stubborn to do so?
I was thinking about these exact scriptures when I made the comment, you fricking moron.
Posted on 5/30/26 at 10:41 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The problem is that there is no evidence in the historical record to support this argument, and there is historical evidence to support his argument.
What I've just been telling the user Mo Jeaux could apply to foo too. Not only does the Bible retell the Sumerian stories, but the patriarch of Judaism (and therefore Christianity and Islam too) literally came from Sumer. The idea that they were not rehashing older myths is just fricking absurd.
But as I said before, there is no sense talking about it with someone who is going to deny this obvious connection because of the "supernatural aspects of the Bible."
Popular
Back to top


0







