10
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Reflecting Pool Case Dismissed with Prejudice: No evidence of a crime
Posted on 10/1/26 at 11:19 am
Posted on 10/1/26 at 11:19 am
Judge went out of his way to emphasize that damage to Pool was caused by the contractor's "rushed and botched" job.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 10/1/26 at 11:20 am to IvoryBillMatt
Huge win for you libs
Posted on 10/1/26 at 11:22 am to IvoryBillMatt
At no point was this going to end any other way.
If you didn't know that from the get go, yikes.
If you didn't know that from the get go, yikes.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 11:23 am to SDVTiger
Agreed. The emotional investment in this has been hilarious. As if Trump himself were down there lining the pool with some faulty material.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 11:26 am to Wildcat1996
Well he literally had some people arrested and charged them with felonies for things they never did and crimes that never occurred. All in order to cover for a contractor who got paid $12 million to frick something up.
Is there a term for that? It's not "emotional investment" .
Is there a term for that? It's not "emotional investment" .
Posted on 10/1/26 at 11:26 am to Wildcat1996
quote:
Agreed. The emotional investment in this has been hilarious. As if Trump himself were down there lining the pool with some faulty material.
I think those who called for jailing people may have dibs on the emotional investment.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 11:26 am to IvoryBillMatt
Was this your Super Bowl?
Posted on 10/1/26 at 11:28 am to Wildcat1996
quote:
As if Trump himself were down there lining the pool with some faulty material.
He sure did say a lot of stupid s*** about it. Whole thing would've been a nonstory without him meddling.
Just hire a reputable company to fix it and keep it moving...
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 10/1/26 at 11:32 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Huge win for you libs
Knowing how childish you are, I have to say I'm not a lib, or you would crow "you didn't deny it!"
To save time, this is my eternal denial that I am a liberal or an alter (your other "burn").
In the scheme of things, it's certainly not a huge deal either way. I posted it just because of how unusual it is for a DC judge to dismiss a criminal complaint with prejudice (meaning it can't be brought again).
This post was edited on 10/1/26 at 12:15 pm
Posted on 10/1/26 at 11:34 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Judge went out of his way to emphasize that damage to Pool was caused by the contractor's "rushed and botched" job.
You do know Jeanine Pirro's office had already withdrawn the prosecution before today's ruling on the “with prejudice” issue, right?
Posted on 10/1/26 at 11:35 am to ATrillionaire
quote:
I think those who called for jailing people may have dibs on the emotional investment.
Agreed. Trump was convicted because emotional morons don’t know the difference between assessed value and fair market value. You’re one of them.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 11:35 am to mwade91383
quote:
At no point was this going to end any other way.
If you didn't know that from the get go, yikes.
I didn't think there would be a conviction, but I am surprised that it was dismissed with prejudice.
At the very preliminary stage of a case, it's unusual for a judge to conclude that the there is no scenario where the prosecution might ultimately find incriminating evidence in the future.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 11:36 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
the scheme of things, it's certainly not huge deal either way. I posted it just because of how unusual it is for a DC judge to dismiss a criminal complaint with prejudice (meaning it can't be brought again).
Isn’t there some video out there showing someone cutting the liner? Is it a different person?
Posted on 10/1/26 at 11:37 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:The prosecution withdrew the charges!
I didn't think there would be a conviction
Posted on 10/1/26 at 11:38 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
At the very preliminary stage of a case, it's unusual for a judge to conclude that the there is no scenario where the prosecution might ultimately find incriminating evidence in the future.
That's because the whole thing was unusual and nothing more than bizaare Trump fan fiction.
In a normal administration, I'd agree with you.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 11:38 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
You do know Jeanine Pirro's office had already withdrawn the prosecution before today's ruling on the “with prejudice” issue, right?
Right. That had no bearing on whether or not Hearn could have been prosecuted in the future for the same offense.
You do know that...right?
Posted on 10/1/26 at 11:39 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Huge win for you libs
It’s obviously not a win for the libs, but it is incredibly embarrassing for the president.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 11:43 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
The prosecution withdrew the charges!
Try to keep up. I was responding to the question about knowing what would happen at the very beginning.
quote:
If you didn't know that from the get go, yikes.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 11:51 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
am a liberal or an alter (your other "burn").
The same insults you have used against others?
Posted on 10/1/26 at 11:52 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Agreed. Trump was convicted because emotional morons don’t know the difference between assessed value and fair market value. You’re one of them.
I admire your passion. Wrong thread, but keep the admiration.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News