- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Recount Ordered for Rep. Lauren Boebert–Adam Frisch Race
Posted on 12/1/22 at 1:44 pm
Posted on 12/1/22 at 1:44 pm
So the steal didn't go quite as planned the first time?
EpochTimes
quote:
Counties have been directed to work with canvass boards to test tabulation equipment. After the tests, counties will recount all ballots for the 3rd district race the same way they were counted during the election. Every county will be using the tabulators, according to Griswold’s office, except for San Juan County. Officials there will be manually recounting the ballots.
quote:
“This is an automatic recount written into Colorado statue. Colorado elections are rock solid and if historical precedent of recounts in the state holds, it is unlikely to change more than a handful of votes,” he explained in a recent statement.
EpochTimes
This post was edited on 12/1/22 at 1:45 pm
15
Posted on 12/1/22 at 1:46 pm to Chazreinhold
If you recount faulty or falsified ballots, the recount won’t matter.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 1:46 pm to Chazreinhold
quote:
recounting the ballots. quote:“This is an automatic recount written i
If they are so rock solid why should one vote change
Posted on 12/1/22 at 1:46 pm to Chazreinhold
Recounts are automatically done without questions or regard to winner.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 1:46 pm to Chazreinhold
Her oponent conceded.
Colorado law still requires a mandatory recount in such a close race.
Why are people struggling with this painfully simple concept?
Colorado law still requires a mandatory recount in such a close race.
Why are people struggling with this painfully simple concept?
Posted on 12/1/22 at 1:49 pm to Chazreinhold
Is anyone surprised they need another go at getting rid of her?
Posted on 12/1/22 at 1:50 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Colorado law still requires a mandatory recount in such a close race.
Why are people struggling with this painfully simple concept?
I don't think people are struggling with the law. They are struggling with the new ballots for Democrats that will be found.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 1:50 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Her oponent conceded.
Colorado law still requires a mandatory recount in such a close race.
Good points, though I don't suppose theoretically anything would keep him from un-conceding?
IIRC- Gore initially conceded to Bush and then called him back to un-concede when the chads began to hang a little bit more.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 1:50 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Why are people struggling with this painfully simple concept?
Because not everyone on this board is as painfully simple as you I would imagine.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 1:51 pm to rpg37
quote:
Recounts are automatically done without questions or regard to winner.
Why?
Do tabulators get more accurate once they're warmed up?
Posted on 12/1/22 at 1:52 pm to Chazreinhold
And we should have confidence in our elections. Sure.
She should tell them to FO.
She should tell them to FO.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 1:53 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Why are people struggling with this painfully simple concept?
I don't think anybody is struggling with the concept. Some are questioning the logic - why would a second count be different than the first count if vote counting is as accurate as we're often told it is.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 1:55 pm to David_DJS
The fact this was close in a safe district
Tells u how toxic nutty she is
Tells u how toxic nutty she is
Posted on 12/1/22 at 1:58 pm to PhDoogan
quote:A “concession” in a US election has no substantive purpose. It is just a polite gesture.
I don't suppose theoretically anything would keep him from un-conceding? IIRC- Gore initially conceded to Bush and then called him back to un-concede when the chads began to hang a little bit more.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 2:01 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
they need another go at getting rid of her
If that in fact happens, if she falls behind in the final recount, it's because to voters in her district rightly determined she's too radical, too extreme for the Colorado Third.
We need less hostility, less "angertainment" in our present political discourse.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 2:01 pm to David_DJS
quote:
quote:Why are people struggling with this painfully simple concept? I don't think anybody is struggling with the concept. Some are questioning the logic - why would a second count be different than the first count if vote counting is as accurate as we're often told it is.
I go to the bank and cash a check, and I count my money after the clerk counts my money.
Why wouldn’t the same principle apply to an election? People make honest mistakes, sometimes it helps one candidate over another.
There’s nothing wrong with a recount.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 2:06 pm to tarzana
quote:
We need less hostility
Go frick yourself. Yall have no problems with your candidates openly advocating against violence done to Trump supporters. Seriously frick off
Posted on 12/1/22 at 2:08 pm to doubleb
quote:
Why wouldn’t the same principle apply to an election? People make honest mistakes, sometimes it helps one candidate over another.
I'm sorta there with you. My post was more about the inconsistencies in what we're often told by so-called experts and the politicians that cite them.
That said, I'm interested in something - what's an example of an honest mistake that favors one candidate over another.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 2:09 pm to tarzana
quote:
We need less hostility, less "angertainment" in our present political discourse.
Translation: you need to agree with the way I think, or else.
We've already seen what you people's idea of "compromise" is. frick straight off.
Posted on 12/1/22 at 2:09 pm to Tmcgin
quote:
Tmcgin
I see you still have vaginosis.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News