- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ‘Read this email immediately’: CDC calls 180 employees back to work 2 weeks after firing
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:51 am to RelicBatches86
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:51 am to RelicBatches86
quote:
The man who has time to run 5 different businesses is sure looking incompetent on this DOGE stuff.
You are showing that you have zero understanding of how these things work - this is exactly how you want it to happen. This is what happened all the time when you are trying to fix a failing business and our government is in way worse shape that any failing company.
Your poor public education has failed you.
0
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:54 am to Thecoz
quote:
As op said.. hiring freeze.. encourage retirement.. salary management.. job transfers.. operation cost reduction.. then staff reductions.. done in a thoughtful .. planned .. methodical manner.. which this is not.
I disagree. We need a disruptive force and I'm OK with coming back and fine tuning some of the rough cuts.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 9:55 am to dickkellog
“really going to spend money on a lawyer to keep your 80k a year "career" job?”
Oh you are not going after 80k… and you do not do it unless the lawyer believes it can be impactful..
Was involved in a merger.. was not even laid off but had a few lawyers call me .. asked what my new job was.. new title.. new pay.. said I was happy.. they said give them a call if I decided I felt differently.. they had a copy of our termination letter..a copy of internal merger requirements and other stuff..
They helped a few of my coworkers
“ they got it done”
Oh you are not going after 80k… and you do not do it unless the lawyer believes it can be impactful..
Was involved in a merger.. was not even laid off but had a few lawyers call me .. asked what my new job was.. new title.. new pay.. said I was happy.. they said give them a call if I decided I felt differently.. they had a copy of our termination letter..a copy of internal merger requirements and other stuff..
They helped a few of my coworkers
“ they got it done”
Posted on 3/6/25 at 10:01 am to Flats
Once again, there's easy ways around this.
Slash their pay to minimum wage levels and these leaches will voluntarily leave.
Slash their pay to minimum wage levels and these leaches will voluntarily leave.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 10:03 am to 4cubbies
quote:
This is an emotional claim. How exactly did you draw this conclusion?
Link me to any posts of yours prior to Trump/DOGE talking about the unsustainable size/scope of the federal government
Posted on 3/6/25 at 10:11 am to 4cubbies
quote:
you know I’ve said over and over, cut it all then bring back what’s needed.
Is that considered efficient?
Very.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 10:11 am to Pettifogger
quote:
Link me to any posts of yours prior to Trump/DOGE talking about the unsustainable size/scope of the federal government
She gone.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 10:33 am to Pettifogger
quote:
Link me to any posts of yours prior to Trump/DOGE talking about the unsustainable size/scope of the federal government
So you're using a nonexistent post as evidence of your baseless accusation? While also insinuating your accusation isn't emotional?
I discussed the OP, I didn't opine about anything else.
I guess I can assume you think funding unicorn reproductive rights is a great use of funds? link me to any posts of yours decrying that.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 10:34 am to stout
quote:
No big deal
Imagine Biden's administration did this. The board would be going berserk at the incompetence.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 10:37 am to udtiger
It was...........................they all got paid to do nothing. Part of the whole laundering racket, let them stay home, cause there are reasons they were let go.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 10:38 am to 4cubbies
quote:Cubs, do you know what contractual "for cause" termination is? Because the above notice does not meet muster ITR.
quote:Again, dismissal under probationary status does not equate to firing.
employment of anyone on probation.
quote:I'd suspect the target audience for that information is not a post-grad subset, otherwise they might have referred to Selective depletion of kisspeptin neurons in the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus in early juvenile life reduces pubertal LH secretion and delays puberty onset in mice. I just don't think it would make the comms-PR point as effectively.
I was curious about all the hullabaloo about the mice, so I googled it. Please read this official White House webpage. How embarrassing.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 10:39 am to 4cubbies
quote:
So you're using a nonexistent post as evidence of your baseless accusation? While also insinuating your accusation isn't emotional?
I discussed the OP, I didn't opine about anything else.
I guess I can assume you think funding unicorn reproductive rights is a great use of funds? link me to any posts of yours decrying that.
No idea what this gibberish is
The people (you) who want a larger government that attacks her political enemies (still you) wants us to care about 180 people who were laid off too quickly and are being brought back into the fold.
We don't care
Posted on 3/6/25 at 10:40 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Imagine Biden's administration did this. The board would be going berserk at the incompetence
The contortions we're seeing over this are crazy.
Biden didn't run the country for two years, oversaw billions and billions of dollars completely lost/squandered, and you think this would register as a significant failing?
Posted on 3/6/25 at 10:43 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Imagine Biden's administration did this.
I can't. The dementia patient couldn't understand DOGE and would implement it if he did.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 10:43 am to Pettifogger
quote:
No idea what this gibberish is
Very convenient.
quote:
The people (you) who want a larger government that attacks her political enemies (still you)
What else can you do besides make baseless emotional accusations on the internet?
quote:
wants us to care about 180 people who were laid off too quickly
I want you to care about the sociopath responsible for capriciously firing hundreds of thousands of people and immediately regretting his directives.
quote:
We don't care
Yes, this is abundantly clear.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 10:45 am to Thecoz
[img]Was involved in a merger.. was not even laid off but had a few lawyers call me .. asked what my new job was.. new title.. new pay.. said I was happy.. they said give them a call if I decided I felt differently.. they had a copy of our termination letter..a copy of internal merger requirements and other stuff.. [/img]
i'll take things that never happened for 500 alex, employment lawyers don't work on contingency jethro, tell me you've never hired a lawyer without telling me you've never hired a lawyer. you see the way you can tell someone's never hired a lawyer is you all think all lawyers work on contingency , that's only personal injury lawyers you hear the commercials, you see the TV adds employment lawyers do not work on contingency that's how i know you simply pulled "Was involved in a merger.. was not even laid off but had a few lawyers call me" out of your a*s. why don't you give your mother her phone back you're embarrassing yourself
i'll take things that never happened for 500 alex, employment lawyers don't work on contingency jethro, tell me you've never hired a lawyer without telling me you've never hired a lawyer. you see the way you can tell someone's never hired a lawyer is you all think all lawyers work on contingency , that's only personal injury lawyers you hear the commercials, you see the TV adds employment lawyers do not work on contingency that's how i know you simply pulled "Was involved in a merger.. was not even laid off but had a few lawyers call me" out of your a*s. why don't you give your mother her phone back you're embarrassing yourself
Posted on 3/6/25 at 10:49 am to 4cubbies
quote:
I want you to care about the sociopath responsible for capriciously firing hundreds of thousands of people and immediately regretting his directives
wHo iS beInG eMoTioNal!?!?!
Posted on 3/6/25 at 10:49 am to dickkellog
You are correct.. as I said I did not hire them. Got a free lunch out of it though
Posted on 3/6/25 at 10:53 am to Spelt it rong
Have you ever worked at a company that has had a change in ownership? All kinds of things like this happen in those situations. People in the private sector deal with it all the time.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 10:54 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Cubs, do you know what contractual "for cause" termination is? Because the above notice does not meet muster ITR.
I'm not making a legal argument in front of a judge. We can logically assume none (or very few at best) of the people capriciously terminated are legal scholars. It is clear that this language was used to imply performance-based terminations or dissuade unemployment claims from the people who were terminated - probably both.
quote:
I just don't think it would make the comms-PR point as effectively.
Unless more evidence was discovered pointing to the numerous dangers of HRT, this funding is wasteful. Even if it does, anyone with two brain cells can determine that injecting one's body with unnecessary testosterone or estrogen is dangerous without further research. I'm certainly not defending this use of taxpayer money. I want to make that clear.
quote:
Last night, President Donald J. Trump highlighted many of the egregious examples of waste, fraud, and abuse funded by American taxpayers, including $8 million spent by the Biden Administration “for making mice transgender.”
The Fake News losers at CNN immediately tried to fact check it, but President Trump was right (as usual).
This is making a PR point effectively?
Page 20 of 24
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News