- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/20/24 at 3:13 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
I don't like the idea of them going house to house either but I'm good with them giving rides back home
I agree. In areas where large numbers will be apprehended and logistics require it, use military to transfer to whatever holding camp/facility is being used.
shite, there 86,000 newly hired IRS agents that could be trained. Make teams, place an experienced federal Marshal with a couple of the newbies, wind em up and let em go. Most will go peacefully. Use more force when going after the criminals or Venezuelan gangs.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 3:13 pm to Flightnclouds
quote:I use the term that they were criminals in their home country. They are all criminals by being here illegally. Dried up freebies and no jobs is the answer to self-deporting.
Very few criminals will self deport.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 3:14 pm to rwestmore7
If you are arguing against Rand Paul, there is a very good chance you are wrong.
If I disagree with Rand, or Thomas Massie, I do some research and generally come around to their way of thinking. Not always, but it's very rare that I disagree with them after looking into the issue.
If I disagree with Rand, or Thomas Massie, I do some research and generally come around to their way of thinking. Not always, but it's very rare that I disagree with them after looking into the issue.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 3:15 pm to rwestmore7
quote:Has always been all talk.
Rand Paul
His buddy Fauci knows this.
30 days to leave or, the military rounds them up.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 3:16 pm to rwestmore7
Rand has got his principles mixed up in this. The military's #1 job is to protect americans from foreign enemies. This is absolutely a reasonable utilization of the military to protect and enforce our borders.
THAT is image/perception that is indeed needed in this country. We are going to protect Americans with full force.
THAT is image/perception that is indeed needed in this country. We are going to protect Americans with full force.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 3:16 pm to rwestmore7
So we send our military to wreck cities in other countries but we wont use them to protect our borders.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 3:17 pm to FATBOY TIGER
I agree.
Rand Paul is not president.
And just like his old man, he never will be.
Rand Paul is not president.
And just like his old man, he never will be.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 3:17 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
there 86,000 newly hired IRS agents
I had this idea as well. They could be transferred to ICE.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 3:18 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
If you are arguing against Rand Paul, there is a very good chance you are wrong.
If I disagree with Rand, or Thomas Massie, I do some research and generally come around to their way of thinking. Not always, but it's very rare that I disagree with them after looking into the issue.
The federal government and the military should protect US citizens. I guess we are all wrong for thinking that should happen on US soil and not just on foreign soil.
Or maybe Paul is in the wrong here.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 3:20 pm to rwestmore7
Who the frick has said this is going to happen?
They are leaving, lots of ways to do it.
This is why senators, even good ones, are basically worthless.
They are leaving, lots of ways to do it.
This is why senators, even good ones, are basically worthless.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 3:21 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
There is already enough federal law enforcement for this, where cities are uncooperative. There is arguable way more federal law enforcement than we need. Put them to work doing this. Leave the military out of it. It's counter-productive.
Honestly not seeing the difference here.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 3:21 pm to rwestmore7
Agree rand. Totally agree we shouldn't use the army for this.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 3:22 pm to rwestmore7
Apples and cowboy boots. Using our military for mass deportations does not mean putting the Army into our cities.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 3:23 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
However, this was an acute & chronic illegal invasion by millions of foreigners. The military can certainly defend our citizens & communities by rounding up the millions of foreign invaders.
I was in agreement with Rand but this is an invasion of able-bodied fighting age men. Our country has never had to defend itself inside out borders, until now. Interesting times....
Posted on 11/20/24 at 3:23 pm to rwestmore7
Grab a few of them and put them in gitmo as terrorist invaders
There rest will go back without hesitation
There rest will go back without hesitation
Posted on 11/20/24 at 3:24 pm to dgnx6
quote:
The federal government and the military should protect US citizens. I guess we are all wrong for thinking that should happen on US soil and not just on foreign soil.
That's not what he's saying at all. They can certainly protect the borders. He's saying they don't need to be in cities rounding up people.
We have plenty of law enforcement for that.
quote:
AI Overview
The United States has over 80 federal law enforcement agencies. Some examples include:
Department of Homeland Security
This agency includes the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), U.S. Secret Service (USSS), U.S. Coast Guard (USCG), Transportation Security Agency (TSA), Federal Protective Service (FPS), and Federal Emergency Management Agency's Mount Weather Police Department (FEMA).
Department of Justice
This agency includes the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), U.S. Marshals Service, U.S. Park Police, and U.S. Secret Service.
Other agencies
These include the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) and the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA).
Federal law enforcement agencies are responsible for enforcing federal law. Their duties include police response, criminal investigation, inspections, security and protection, court operations, and corrections
Why do we need the military to be involved in this?
Posted on 11/20/24 at 3:25 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Honestly not seeing the difference here.
You don't see the difference in domestic law enforcement agencies and the military?
If that is the case, I can't help you.
Posted on 11/20/24 at 3:28 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
Why do we need the military to be involved in this?
I certainly don't want to pay for them to fly home commercially. Stick them on a C-5 and let our military fly them to their country, along with a compliment of certified badasses and hardware, in case their country doesn't want to take them.
Popular
Back to top


0







