- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rafael Grossi- IAEA confirms Iran has enough material to make several nuclear warheads.
Posted on 6/20/25 at 8:27 am to theunknownknight
Posted on 6/20/25 at 8:27 am to theunknownknight
quote:
quote:
Pakistan is confirmed to have nukes.
Then they need to be destroyed. There are people there that don't like us. We can't take any chances.
Gonna be a lot of destroying around the world.
1
Posted on 6/20/25 at 8:28 am to ATrillionaire
quote:
Gonna be a lot of destroying around the world.
Amen
Posted on 6/20/25 at 8:47 am to joshnorris14
quote:
You can defend yourself lying , you can admit that you are lying, you can ignore this thread, or you can make odd personal attacks. All of these options have the same impact on me.
I'll state this clearly. According to the IAEA, Iran currently has zero material capable of being used for nuclear weapons.
Well I know I am lying and all after saying I watched it this morning on Maria Bartiromo... Well...
LINK Imjur link for video I shot this morning.
He clearly says they have enough material for several warheads. Say whatever you want to. This is the general director of IAEA. If you have a problem with the way he states it, mischaracterizes it, or is flat lying about it then contact him. I was 100% accurate.
BTW... you never said which city in Iran you live in...
This post was edited on 6/20/25 at 2:38 pm
Posted on 6/20/25 at 8:50 am to Tridentds
quote:Pack it, or wait to get it packed.
Just pack your shite
Posted on 6/20/25 at 8:52 am to Tridentds
quote:
He clearly says they have enough material for several warheads. Say whatever you want to. This is the general director of IAEA. If you have a problem with the way he states it, mischaracterizes it, or is flat lying about it then contact him. I was 100% accurate.
I provided the quote. He did not say that.
Posted on 6/20/25 at 8:53 am to joshnorris14
That's a video link. 
But go ahead and say he didn't say it.
So you spend 2 1/2 pages saying I am lying and then when I have time to post the actual video of the general director of the IAEA himself saying EXACTLY what I said he said.... you weakly say you quoted him already?
Good grief. I guess you gone now.
But go ahead and say he didn't say it. So you spend 2 1/2 pages saying I am lying and then when I have time to post the actual video of the general director of the IAEA himself saying EXACTLY what I said he said.... you weakly say you quoted him already?
Good grief. I guess you gone now.
This post was edited on 6/20/25 at 9:17 am
Posted on 6/20/25 at 9:40 am to LuckyTiger
quote:
Really? Because that's not what Grossi said...
quote:
Grossi told CNN said that U.N. inspectors did not have proof that Iran was engaged in “a systematic effort to move into a nuclear weapon.”
Now post what he did say that ruins your narrative.
quote:
we do not have any indication that there is a systemic program in Iran to manufacture a nuclear weapon,” Grossi cautions, stressing that the IAEA only reports on what it can verify itself, and does not engage in speculation.
The IAEA says "we see no evidence of weapons production, but Iran doesn't let us see everything."
But all the "anti-war" people see is "no proof."
It would be like cops saying, "We checked John Wayne Gacy's living room and found no signs of murder. He wouldn't let us check the basement." And then all you people come running here to say, "See? JWG isn't a murderer. Those 2 dozen boys last seen with him isn't evidence of anything."
Sometimes you just need to use common sense and accept that when a hostile actor is hiding something from inspectors that there is a nefarious reason for it.
Posted on 6/20/25 at 1:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The fact that they get petro so cheap is irrelevant because they're selling it to fund their entire GDP
So, in your mind, taking the profits from essentially "free" energy in the form of their expansive oil and gas reserves and then pumping it into the extremely costly (at least the startup is) and complicated world of nuclear power - particularly a "non" nuclear power, with all the oversight and potential for international involvement in their operations and all of that headache is a valid rationalization for Iran's nuclear "power" program? (I appreciate your concession they you are not defending their nuclear weapon ambitions)
Because it isn't. It's beyond dangerous when you definitely are pursuing nuclear weapons, your enemies know it and have the capability to do something about it.
Also, maybe not a good idea to convince much of the world, including your fellow, albeit schismatically opposed, muslims that you are crazier than a coked out wolverine.
Posted on 6/20/25 at 1:45 pm to Tridentds
quote:
So enriching to weapons grade for no reason and with no plan on what to do with it. In the process of enriching more material. They haven’t even started trying to figure out what they can do with it. No evidence at all.
Guess they are just sitting around it staring at it like it’s a camp fire and dreaming about all the possibilities since there are so many non-military uses for it. Got it.
BOOM!
Posted on 6/20/25 at 1:49 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
joshnorris14
I'm embarrassed for you
1) the IAEA report had estimated that Iran had enough uranium, if enriched further, for nine nuclear bombs
2) “It’s true that in the early 2000s, there had been some activities which were assessed at that time as related to nuclear weapon development (you understand that was 25 years ago, right?)
3) the IAEA only reports on what it can verify itself
4) the nuclear watchdog has been warning for years that Iran was refusing to share data on its nuclear activities.
5) Since February 2021, Iran has denied IAEA access to recorded data from centrifuge production plants and in June 2022 forced the IAEA to remove monitoring equipment altogether
6) Estimated minimum time it would take 3,000 of Iran’s IR-6 centrifuges starting with natural uranium to enrich enough uranium for Five weapons - Twelve months
summation - Iran has had no monitoring for 3 years. They had the materials and technology to make 5 bombs within 12 months. And not one single agency has been allowed to monitor if they have or not
Dont be a dumbass. If they pull this off, they get Israel, parts of the US and a paradise with 70 virgins. They are working toward it
Posted on 6/20/25 at 2:00 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
Asked about the timeline in which Iran could theoretically produce a nuclear weapon, even an extremely crude one, Grossi says it is one thing to have enough enriched uranium for a nuclear weapon — the IAEA report had estimated that Iran had enough uranium, if enriched further, for nine nuclear bombs — but another thing entirely to have a warhead to put it in.
In this real world Roadrunner and Coyote cartoon known as Israel vs the fanatical Muslims, I have little doubt that Israel is going to somehow make any warhead they get, blow up in their faces. A nuclear warhead that explodes at launch would be their magnum opus.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News