- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Radical protesters are now invading the homes of our heroic ICE agents and their families,
Posted on 1/17/26 at 1:37 pm to SOSFAN
Posted on 1/17/26 at 1:37 pm to SOSFAN
quote:
It's too bad these officers are being used as pawns in this juvenile game of power that Trump is playing.
Your boy Biden
Stopped reading there. But thanks for the laugh.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 1:37 pm to TX Tiger
If you agree, why did you pretend the $200M was a significant data point?
Oh right. Because you’re a disingenuous piece of shite.
Oh right. Because you’re a disingenuous piece of shite.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 1:40 pm to Placekicker
quote:
So, you don’t care if they harass women and children so long as there is no video proof of them entering their homes??
Just say it’s not in the video
It’s cute how you always go for the emotional argument when presented with rationality.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 1:41 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
It's too bad these officers are being used as pawns in this juvenile game of power that Trump is playing.
Enforcing long standing immigration laws, that both parties agreed to at the time, is a juvenilr game of power?
Dawg, just stop. You are an embarrassment to intellectual thought processes.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 1:41 pm to onmymedicalgrind
It’s not in the video. They weren’t invading the homes. Only the property.
Do you support that? Yes or no.
Do you support that? Yes or no.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 1:44 pm to the808bass
quote:
If you agree, why did you pretend the $200M was a significant data point?
con·text
/'käntekst/
noun
noun: context; plural noun: contexts
the circumstances that form the setting for an event, statement, or idea, and in terms of which it can be fully understood and assessed.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 1:47 pm to the808bass
quote:
It’s not in the video. They weren’t invading the homes. Only the property. Do you support that? Yes or no.
I do not support that.
I did not review with a fine tooth comb, but were they on people’s property, or on the public sidewalks?
Posted on 1/17/26 at 1:54 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
It’s cute how you always go for the emotional argument when presented with rationality.
It’s cute how you split hairs. You sound like you’re ok with Liberals harassing women and children on their property, so long as they’re not invading the house.
They shouldn’t be bothering them period. Yet, you’re defending them with word games.
You never answered my question- would you be ok with whackos bothering your family, on your property, because they don’t like the way you do your job?
That is the root of the topic.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 1:59 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
Minnesota ranks in the middle-to-lower tier of U.S. states regarding its total number of unauthorized immigrants, yet Trump sends the largest immigration enforcement operation in the agency's history to that location
This has already been explained, even prior to ICE involvement in Minn. I wish you would have paid attention.
Why not decry those responsible for needing the extra ICE officers? If local and state officials would follow federal law or at least assist, these extra ICE, as well as US Marshalls, would not be needed.
Place blame where blame should go. Do not place blame where it is politically convenient for you.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 2:01 pm to TX Tiger
No. You were providing fake context that $200 million was a lot of money for them to be paying in taxes. That’s the opposite of context.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 2:04 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
but were they on people’s property, or on the public sidewalks?
If you were a law enforcement official, and individuals involved in not-so-peaceful demonstrations found out your identity and home address and were now congregating in front of your house, at night...would it matter if it was your yard, the public sidewalk or even the road?
While I love me some freedom, you are playing a very dangerous game of semantics with someone's family.
This post was edited on 1/17/26 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 1/17/26 at 2:04 pm to Placekicker
quote:
It’s cute how you split hairs.
Sorry, I’m a stickler for being truthful with your words and I’m not a fan of exaggerating to rile people up. I know, character flaw of mine.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 2:06 pm to onmymedicalgrind
The title is click bait.
Her YouTube video just says the protesters were “showing up at” people’s homes.
Her video is pretty short and doesn’t provide much of anything.
Her YouTube video just says the protesters were “showing up at” people’s homes.
Her video is pretty short and doesn’t provide much of anything.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 2:08 pm to UtahCajun
quote:
would it matter if it was your yard, the public sidewalk or even the road?
Of course it would matter. If they were on the public sidewalk or the road, I would call the police and alert them to what was going on. If they did that shite on my property, I would shoot them.
quote:
While I love me some freedom, you are playing a very dangerous game of semantics with someone's family.
I understand freedom can be scary.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 2:09 pm to onmymedicalgrind
Is someone publishing the names of ICE agents more of this “freedom” you are championing?
Posted on 1/17/26 at 2:11 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Of course it would matter. If they were on the public sidewalk or the road, I would call the police and alert them to what was going on. If they did that shite on my property, I would shoot them.
So bottom line, you do not support it.
Why did you just not say that when asked the first time? Why did it have to be pulled out of you?
quote:
I understand freedom can be scary.
Most are truly afraid it.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 2:12 pm to Ailsa
quote:I missed the part in the video where someone "invades" the house of an ICE agent.
protesters are now invading the homes of our heroic ICE agents
Posted on 1/17/26 at 2:13 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Sorry, I’m a stickler for being truthful with your words and I’m not a fan of exaggerating to rile people up. I know, character flaw of mine.
It’s an age old tactic of the Left. It’s similar to them harassing Supreme Court Justices, but these are innocent women and children. This should rile people up.
You still haven’t answered my question. Are you fine with people harassing your family, on your property, because they didn’t like the way you took care of someone?
Posted on 1/17/26 at 2:16 pm to Ailsa
Firing pin meets the primer for anyone doing this.
Looks like y'all missed one.
Looks like y'all missed one.
This post was edited on 1/22/26 at 7:15 am
Posted on 1/17/26 at 2:21 pm to Placekicker
quote:
It’s an age old tactic of the Left. It’s similar to them harassing Supreme Court Justices, but these are innocent women and children. This should rile people up
Playing the game of semantics in casual conversations is not just a tactic of the left. All faux intellectuals play it. It gives them the special feeling of being above those they are conversing with. Never actually understanding that it is just casual conversation. Grammer nazis are much the same. Can't think of a response, play the games until A) you finally think of something or B) they other side tires.
Popular
Back to top


1




