Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Question about President Trump’s federal judgeship appointments

Posted on 12/24/19 at 7:20 am
Posted by Sheepdog1833
Member since Feb 2019
685 posts
Posted on 12/24/19 at 7:20 am
I keep seeing that President Trump’s appointment of so many conservative federal judges protects us for decades to come from full on liberal Armageddon.
My question is, what’s the normal turnover of these judgeships for a President? If it’s all the same, the percentage of conservative to liberal judges could just as easily tip back the same way it was before his election, correct?

All this as a ploy to not help my wife wrap Christmas presents.
Posted by NoMoreKnees
Pulaski, TN
Member since Jan 2017
313 posts
Posted on 12/24/19 at 7:24 am to
O’Bama left somewhere around 140 seats open.
Posted by Champs
Geaux Tigers
Member since Feb 2008
11708 posts
Posted on 12/24/19 at 8:04 am to
quote:

OBama


lazy is lazy
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 12/24/19 at 8:16 am to
quote:

lazy is lazy



Lazy has nothing to do with it.

Obama left 140 open because Mitch McConnell pretty much stopped judicial confirmations in the last two years of his presidency after the GOP took over the Senate. It wasn't just Merrick Garland that was blocked.

Mitch only allowed through a select few that had support from republican senators.

For example, Obama only managed to get just two appellate judges through and one of them was assigned to patent court.

For comparison's sake, 10 such appellate judges were confirmed during the last two years of the Bush 43 presidency, and Democrats controlled the Senate.
Posted by thetempleowl
dallas, tx
Member since Jul 2008
14828 posts
Posted on 12/24/19 at 8:18 am to
quote:

lazy is lazy





He didn't necessarily leave them open due to laziness.

I think the turtle dragging his feet was causing the delay. Turns out it was a great play by him, because when trump got elected they have been filling seats at record pace.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95633 posts
Posted on 12/24/19 at 8:20 am to
There has also been other reforms in how the seats are filled IIRC.

I don’t believe a judge can be blocked by their home state senator anymore due to that senator refusing to turn in the paperwork saying “confirm them”.


Lots of seats stayed vacant because one senator from a state would block certain applicants.
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
21250 posts
Posted on 12/24/19 at 8:52 am to
A cocaine fueled turtle saved the Republic.

First Senator added to Mount Rushmore.
Posted by Lickitty Split
Inside
Member since Apr 2017
3911 posts
Posted on 12/24/19 at 10:33 am to
Everything everybody said below plus it’s a lifetime appointment and most of Trump’s appointments are younger than normal. That means a lot of them could serve 30 years if they really wanted.

We should have a stable of good young judges for awhile when Trump is re-elected, it may be cause more retirement from both older conservative judges and the oldest democratic judges that don’t want to wait 4 more years.
Posted by Rooskie
MN
Member since Oct 2019
643 posts
Posted on 12/24/19 at 10:37 am to
quote:

A cocaine fueled turtle saved the Republic.

Posted by Free888
Member since Oct 2019
1619 posts
Posted on 12/24/19 at 10:43 am to
I think Mitch was also helped by Harry Reid eliminating the 60 vote requirement, because the moron never expected the Republicans to gain back the Senate.
Posted by DallasTiger11
Los Angeles
Member since Mar 2004
11809 posts
Posted on 12/24/19 at 10:54 am to
The Democrats will court pack next time they have power. They have to overcome the judicial branch somehow
Posted by boomtown143
Merica
Member since May 2019
6701 posts
Posted on 12/24/19 at 11:05 am to
quote:

what’s the normal turnover of these judgeships for a President?


He's putting younger than normal judges in these positions. That, on top of how many, changes the game.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37655 posts
Posted on 12/24/19 at 11:42 am to
quote:

The Democrats will court pack next time they have power. They have to overcome the judicial branch somehow

No they won't. They'll try but it ain't gonna happen. Even they know how badly that would blow up on them.

I assume you're referencing their threat to seat 13 SCOTUS judges thus upping the number well above the traditional 9?

If they tried that it would blow up on them worse than this impeachment thing is blowing up on them.

With that said, the way they are packing the voting blocks with liberal voters and immigrants and brainwashed kids and DACA kids and their path to citizenship.... there may come a day when no Branch ever has a chance of being Republican controlled ever again.

As a matter of fact Obama has gone on record as saying that his policies will not take full effect until twenty years after he left office for just that reason.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46121 posts
Posted on 12/24/19 at 11:48 am to
quote:

O’Bama left somewhere around 140 seats open.


Obammy had bigger fish to fry....like weaponizing the FBI/DOJ and the intel agencies....something had to go on the back burner and that was many leaving judgeships unfilled.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram