- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Qatar slashes its overseas aid spending by roughly 85%
Posted on 8/24/26 at 4:38 am to Nosevens
Posted on 8/24/26 at 4:38 am to Nosevens
quote:
Alright Trump, take the lead in this game. Slash Americas budget equal too or greater than 30% and do a bit better than 85% on foreign aid
I think he’s already come close to that.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 4:40 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Alleged, but unproven, Qatari payments to private US citizens = BAD Americans with BAD motives on behalf of evil Ayrab Mooslems!!!
Documented $400 million Qatari gift for the exclusive use and glorification of our President = GOOD Americans not influenced AT ALL by foreigners!
This is spot on! Trump is the dirtiest president we’ve ever had. I generally like his policies, but oh boy, does he steal!
Posted on 8/24/26 at 5:41 am to Penrod
quote:
I generally like his policies, but oh boy, does he steal.
He doesn't steal. It's just that he and his family are willing to leverage the presidency for financial gain in a way "like nobody has ever seen before!"
In 2025, Trump's reported business and investment income was more than $2 billion (over a billion in crypto). That's more than the presidential salaries paid to ALL of his predecessors, COMBINED. All those salaries added up and adjusted for inflation come to only about 250 million.
2025 was Donald Trump's most financially lucrative year...EVER. He made about three times his 2024 income. What changed???
President Trump in his first term actually lost money. He is changing that this time around BIGLY.
This post was edited on 8/24/26 at 6:46 am
Posted on 8/24/26 at 5:53 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
In 2025, Trump's reported business and investment income was more than $2 billion (over a billion in crypto). That's more than the COMBINED presidential salaries paid to ALL of his predecessors.
Show us your source.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 6:28 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
Show us your source.
Responding to you with facts is akin to casting pearls before swine. You certainly will never say "hey thanks for taking the time to respond and document your assertion, I really appreciate that...usually I just grunt mindless insults at you."
BUT...here goes...
I originally saw it in Forbes, but it's easier to summarize with ChatGPT. You will bitch about that and insult me...as always. The one thing you will NEVER do is contradict me with facts.
################
I calculated it using the actual presidential service period from George Washington's inauguration on April 30, 1789, through Joe Biden's departure on January 20, 2025, rather than simply multiplying each salary by whole four-year terms. The National Archives provides the service dates.
For inflation, I used the long-run U.S. CPI series from MeasuringWorth, which extends the BLS CPI backward to 1774. That's necessary because the official BLS CPI begins in 1913.
The results:
-Presidential salary Period
-Nominal salaries paid
-2025 purchasing-power equivalent
$25,000
1789–1873
$2.10 million
$64.65 million
$50,000
1873–1909
$1.80 million
$63.41 million
$75,000
1909–1949
$2.99 million
$63.88 million
$100,000
1949–1969
$2.00 million
$22.28 million
$200,000
1969–2001
$6.40 million
$20.11 million
$400,000
2001–Jan. 20, 2025
$9.60 million
$13.10 million
TOTAL
Washington–Biden
$24.89 million
˜ $247.4 million
The salary increases occurred in 1873, 1909, 1949, 1969 and 2001; the current $400,000 salary took effect January 20, 2001. That's confirmed by the U.S. Code.
So the best number is:
All presidential salaries paid from Washington through Biden:
Nominal dollars: approximately $24.9 million
Inflation-adjusted to 2025 dollars: approximately $247 million
And this makes the Trump comparison striking.
Using the approximately $2.2 billion of reported 2025 income we discussed:
$2.2 billion ÷ $247 million ˜ 8.9
So Trump's reported 2025 income was approximately 9 times the inflation-adjusted presidential salaries earned by every president from George Washington through Joe Biden combined.
And in nominal dollars:
$2.2 billion ÷ $24.9 million ˜ 88
So Trump's reported 2025 income was about 88 times the actual dollar amount paid in presidential salaries to all his predecessors combined.
This post was edited on 8/24/26 at 6:29 am
Posted on 8/24/26 at 6:36 am to MrLSU
Wish America would do the same and cut 100% of all foreign aid, including aid to Israel. We’re 40T in debt. That’s enough.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 6:39 am to IvoryBillMatt
Ivorysenstivematt good morning!
Posted on 8/24/26 at 6:43 am to Jbird
quote:
Ivorysenstivematt good morning!
Good morning to you, Sir Goal Post Mover!
Hope you have an excellent day.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 6:44 am to MrLSU
Slashing 85% is how you afford Tucker.
It’s like buying a Super Bowl ad.
It’s like buying a Super Bowl ad.
Posted on 8/24/26 at 6:46 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
He doesn't steal. It's just that he and his family are willing to leverage the presidency for financial gain in a way that "nobody has ever seen before!"
I get what you are saying, but selling influence is stealing. It just can’t be proved because no one can quite connect the dots of whether the favors were done because of the “donations”. Similarly, they could not convict the Bidens because maybe they actually put Hunter on Burisma’s Board because of his unique experience and knowledge. I mean, obviously not, but you can’t prove it.
And did Trump support Qatar because they gave him that plane? Is the wink and the nod because the $100,000 payments for early Truth posts are going to buy lucrative insider information?
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:07 am to Penrod
It's all about access to the President. No president before Trump was willing to use his office to plug supporters and/or companies in which the president has investments.
Take the minute necessary to watch the President of the United States make an ad for a contributor from the White House lawn. It's shocking to use the office like that, but it's not illegal. And, even if it were, who would enforce it? The president's DOJ?
Take the minute necessary to watch the President of the United States make an ad for a contributor from the White House lawn. It's shocking to use the office like that, but it's not illegal. And, even if it were, who would enforce it? The president's DOJ?
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:10 am to IvoryBillMatt
Oh my God, he got some free grass for the White House in exchange for an ad.
swing and a miss
swing and a miss
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:10 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:Link fact less Wonder?
Sir Goal Post Mover
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:34 am to MrLSU
Does anyone else find it quaint that this thread has not a single aggy taking a position one way or another?
quote:
Qatar has provided over $890 million in funding to Texas A&M University, primarily through its branch campus in Doha, raising concerns about transparency and potential influence on academic integrity. The partnership has faced scrutiny for compromising American interests and national security due to the nature of the funded research
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:37 am to Jbird
quote:
Link fact less Wonder?
"QF1 isn't going to Trump's library, it's going to stay in the AF inventory. [Assumes President Trump is lying about the future of QF1]
THEN
"Why do you care that QF1 is going to Trump's library? Reagan has an AF1, Dumbass!"
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:40 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:It isn't per your post.
"QF1 isn't going to Trump's library, it's going to stay in the AF inventory. [Assumes President Trump is lying about the future of QF1]
quote:There are currently 3 AF-1 aircraft in the inventory. Two with the baby blue, one you are fixated over.
"Why do you care that QF1 is going to Trump's library? Reagan has an AF1, Dumbass!"
All three are going to retire!
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:41 am to Jbird
quote:
Link fact less Wonder?
Jbird, let's not continue to derail this thread. I think the Qatari Jet provides a benefit to President Trump and provides the appearance of foreign influence.
You don't agree.
Cool
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:43 am to IvoryBillMatt
Well now we finally got down to the brass tacks, it's about your feels. 
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:45 am to IvoryBillMatt
Oh noes Sensitive one!
Qatari 747-8 Conversion to E-4 Airborne Command Aircraft
The U.S. Air Force is indeed moving forward with converting a former Qatari royal Boeing 747-8 into an E-4 airborne command aircraft — a role that is distinct from the presidential “Air Force One” mission, though both involve high-security, mission-critical transport.
Background
The aircraft in question is a Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental originally configured as a Boeing Business Jet for Qatar’s ruling family. It was gifted to the U.S. government and has been under Air Force custody since 2025
airguide.info
airguide.info
. The E-4 is a Survivable Airborne Operations Center (SAOC) — a mobile command post for the President and top national security leaders, capable of operating during nuclear or other national emergencies
Qatari 747-8 Conversion to E-4 Airborne Command Aircraft
The U.S. Air Force is indeed moving forward with converting a former Qatari royal Boeing 747-8 into an E-4 airborne command aircraft — a role that is distinct from the presidential “Air Force One” mission, though both involve high-security, mission-critical transport.
Background
The aircraft in question is a Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental originally configured as a Boeing Business Jet for Qatar’s ruling family. It was gifted to the U.S. government and has been under Air Force custody since 2025
airguide.info
airguide.info
. The E-4 is a Survivable Airborne Operations Center (SAOC) — a mobile command post for the President and top national security leaders, capable of operating during nuclear or other national emergencies
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:48 am to Jbird
quote:
Well now we finally got down to the brass tacks, it's about your feels.
Lol. Of course that's a lie. I can back up everything I have said with objective facts. It just gets tedious...for everybody.
I don't have any feelings about this one way or another.
Popular
Back to top


0




