- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
PSA - Nike subsidiaries
Posted on 9/4/18 at 8:38 am
Posted on 9/4/18 at 8:38 am
I googled "Nike stock" to see how far down they had gone (just down 2% so far, will drop more I am sure)
and I saw "nike subsidiaries" as a "related search term"
a few notables:
Converse
Hurley International
just a heads up guys
eta - Umbro was sold in 2012 - fixed
and I saw "nike subsidiaries" as a "related search term"
a few notables:
Converse
Hurley International
just a heads up guys
eta - Umbro was sold in 2012 - fixed
This post was edited on 9/4/18 at 9:08 am
10
Posted on 9/4/18 at 8:43 am to dcbl
Cole Haan ?
Posted on 9/4/18 at 8:45 am to dcbl
Posted on 9/4/18 at 8:48 am to dcbl
down 3% now 
Posted on 9/4/18 at 8:53 am to dcbl
As long as it's not Johnston and Murphy or Merrell then I am AOK
Posted on 9/4/18 at 8:54 am to dcbl
I really don't understand why anyone has an issue with Nike using Kaep. It's a free market. They are paying him to be part of an ad. If you were buying Nike products prior to this add, you are an idiot if you think any of the proceeds weren't used for (enter SJW or Dem cause here).
Posted on 9/4/18 at 9:00 am to Kracka
quote:
I really don't understand why anyone has an issue with Nike using Kaep.
I don't understand using anyone that is controversial as a front man for their company. Why alienate any portion of your client base on purpose?
These people are stupid
Posted on 9/4/18 at 9:01 am to Kracka
They have to be pissed at something to express “patriotic” outrage.
Posted on 9/4/18 at 9:05 am to Kracka
quote:
I really don't understand why anyone has an issue with Nike using Kaep. It's a free market. They are paying him to be part of an ad. If you were buying Nike products prior to this add, you are an idiot if you think any of the proceeds weren't used for (enter SJW or Dem cause here).
Intentionally obtuse or just stupid? Those are the two options
Posted on 9/4/18 at 9:06 am to VOR
quote:
They have to be pissed at something to express “patriotic” outrage.
You and the rest of the homosexual brigade are outraged about everything
Posted on 9/4/18 at 9:07 am to TigerWise
quote:
Cole Haan ?
not anymore
Nike sells Cole Haan brand to Apax Partners
quote:
(Reuters) - Nike Inc (NKE.N) is selling its Cole Haan handbag and shoe brand to private equity firm Apax Partners for $570 million, nearly 24 years after buying it, the company said on Friday.
Nike, which is focusing on its namesake brand and Jordan, Converse and Hurley, planned selling its Umbro and Cole Haan brands. Umbro was sold for $225 million last month to Iconix Brand Group Inc (ICON.O).
and I was wrong about umbro - op edited
Posted on 9/4/18 at 9:08 am to dcbl
Nike is just engaging in business. I’m pretty
sure they’re going to be okay.
sure they’re going to be okay.
Posted on 9/4/18 at 9:10 am to VOR
quote:
Nike is just engaging in business. I’m pretty
sure they’re going to be okay.
probably, but they will be hurt by this, and they will wind up disassociating from Kaep, but still having to pay him
this move will cost them a lot of money and market share
put them out of business? lol - no
Posted on 9/4/18 at 9:12 am to VOR
And Nike will be losing ours
Posted on 9/4/18 at 9:14 am to Kracka
quote:
It's a free market.
Yep. As a supporter of free markets, I encourage Nike (and every other corporation) to be very open about what they support. I can therefore, in that same free market, determine where I spend my dollars.
Posted on 9/4/18 at 9:20 am to Tigerswillprevail
quote:
I don't understand using anyone that is controversial as a front man for their company. Why alienate any portion of your client base on purpose?
Hasn't Nike done this type of thing before? And again, when you are at the register buying a product. Why does it matter to you who endorsed it? Shouldn't the quality of the product be the reason you are buying it? I have never thought "Man I am really glad XXXX was endorsing this product otherwise I'd never buy it." while I was looking at buying or at the register buying a product.
Posted on 9/4/18 at 9:21 am to bamafan1001
quote:
Intentionally obtuse or just stupid?
For people who were buying Nike products who are now "outraged" yes, they have those options I suppose.
Posted on 9/4/18 at 9:23 am to dcbl
My household is a nike-free household now.
Wtf would I pay money for merchandise from A company that gleefully uses an antiwhite, anti-American spokesman?
I'm a white nonliberal and American.
Wtf would I pay money for merchandise from A company that gleefully uses an antiwhite, anti-American spokesman?
I'm a white nonliberal and American.
Posted on 9/4/18 at 9:24 am to Kracka
I find it ironic that the theme of the campaign is that people should do what is right regardless of what it costs, and now people are going to moral stand in the name of hurting Nike’s stock.....
That is all
That is all
Posted on 9/4/18 at 9:24 am to dcbl
Nike stock will be hurting when next quarter earnings come out.....
just like Netflix stock which gave Hussein Barack Obama and his lovely wife, Michael, a $50 million dollar contract to produce educational films with Susan Rice appointed to its board......
just like Netflix stock which gave Hussein Barack Obama and his lovely wife, Michael, a $50 million dollar contract to produce educational films with Susan Rice appointed to its board......
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News