- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Protester kicks tear gas back at cops who then shoot him in the balls with a riot weapon
Posted on 8/23/17 at 10:55 am to TX Tiger
Posted on 8/23/17 at 10:55 am to TX Tiger
If Trump was the fascist you claim he is the secret police (that this country doesn't have because it is not fascist) would have been using real bullets. They also would be shooting every Antifa member they see burning an American flag on sight. That is how political dissent is handled in countries led by truly fascist leaders.
1
Posted on 8/23/17 at 10:56 am to FooManChoo
quote:Shooting at unarmed citizens, period, under any circumstance with any weapon should never be tolerated in a country supposedly founded on freedom and liberty.
Shooting them with bullets? Yeah, I agree. Shooting them with rubber/paper balls
quote:Yeah, these pussies videoing with their cell phones look real intimidating, don't they.
diffuse a volatile situation
quote:Consider yourself part of the problem.
I'm cool with that. That's not fascism.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 10:57 am to TX Tiger
No matter how many times you say it, he was not "shot" by the police. Keep tilting at that faux windmill.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 10:58 am to Wolfhound45
haha awesome
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:01 am to TX Tiger
quote:i really hope you are trolling because the same could be said to the group you are speaking for.
Shooting at unarmed citizens is funny? Silencing dissent is funny?
We love our fascism, don't we folks?
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:01 am to 88Wildcat
quote:In the 1960s they did use real bullets. And they were applauded the same as in this thread.
If Trump was the fascist you claim he is the secret police (that this country doesn't have because it is not fascist) would have been using real bullets. They also would be shooting every Antifa member they see burning an American flag on sight. That is how political dissent is handled in countries led by truly fascist leaders.
So be honest. Are you condoning this action because they didn't use real bullets, or is it because people you don't agree with were shot at and silenced?
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:02 am to TX Tiger
quote:
So the police told an unarmed citizen to leave, and when he didn't he was deservedly shot.
Correct. They told him to leave and he did not. They used gas to further try to get him to leave and he kicked it back towards them. They then used non-lethal bullets to finally get their message across. Seems like textbook police work. Now stop trolling.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:02 am to TX Tiger
quote:if i feel my life or the lives of my family are threatened I will shoot your unarmed arse in the chest, and that is completely legal.
Shooting at unarmed citizens, period, under any circumstance with any weapon should never be tolerated in a country supposedly founded on freedom and liberty.
This post was edited on 8/23/17 at 11:03 am
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:03 am to Wolfhound45
quote:Who shot him then?
No matter how many times you say it, he was not "shot" by the police.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:04 am to TX Tiger
quote:I'm glad your ignorant opinions aren't the basis for our legal system
Shooting at unarmed citizens, period, under any circumstance with any weapon should never be tolerated in a country supposedly founded on freedom and liberty.
A fascist regime will kill and imprison people who oppose the government. Getting protesters out of the way to ensure the safety of others is not fascism, especially when the protesters are allowed to continue protesting elsewhere.
While I'm not convinced the nut-shot was intentional, even if it was, it was a non-lethal weapon used to disperse people in order to prevent others from getting hurt. The fact that the man who got "shot" walked away from the scene a free (and living) man is a testament to how this was not an example of fascism in action.
quote:The idiots throwing stuff at the police are to blame there. Once the police starting clearing the area, it doesn't matter who was there. I was watching a live feed from an Arizona news station and their reporter and camera crew were moved down the street, too. At least they had enough common sense to not try to engage an alert police/riot crew.
Yeah, these pussies videoing with their cell phones look real intimidating, don't they.
quote:Part of what problem, exactly? There's no evidence of fascism to complain about. You are getting up in arms over nothing and won't let it go. You're wrong. It happens.
Consider yourself part of the problem.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:04 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
When did you become a Toddy level drama queen?
That statement.....on this board.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:06 am to TX Tiger
quote:Give me a fricking break. Kent State is an isolated incident and was wrong and a mistake by the national guard. Dont compare any of this to that. Those protests(not solely but) were because the country was mandating its citizens to joint the armed forces and sending them to a war we should never have been in.
In the 1960s they did use real bullets
These protests are because some peoples feeling are hurt because someone they never knew or cared about before was persecuted 150 years ago.
This post was edited on 8/23/17 at 11:08 am
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:06 am to CarRamrod
quote:I'm not speaking for any group. You'd understand that if you possessed the ability to read and comprehend. It's obvious that you don't. You'll fit in perfectly with this board.
Shooting at unarmed citizens is funny? Silencing dissent is funny?
We love our fascism, don't we folks?
i really hope you are trolling because the same could be said to the group you are speaking for.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:08 am to TX Tiger
So Mr. Sheople, how should the police respond? Just let people do whatever?
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:08 am to TX Tiger
Come at me bro, wanna meet at sonic and ill possess your head to the pavement.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:10 am to Janky
quote:So you're good with police shooting unarmed citizens. Glad we could straighten that out.
So the police told an unarmed citizen to leave, and when he didn't he was deservedly shot.
Correct. They told him to leave and he did not. They used gas to further try to get him to leave and he kicked it back towards them. They then used non-lethal bullets to finally get their message across. Seems like textbook police work. Now stop trolling.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:11 am to CarRamrod
quote:Sure. But you have to spring for the blizzards. They're on sale ya know, buy one at full price and get the next one for 99 cents.
Come at me bro, wanna meet at sonic and ill possess your head to the pavement.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:12 am to TX Tiger
quote:
So you're good with police shooting unarmed citizens. Glad we could straighten that out
Out of context, but yeah.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:13 am to Janky
He's an idiot on the dodge, irrelevent
Posted on 8/23/17 at 11:14 am to CarRamrod
quote:You're comparing that to a bunch of pussy punks standing around videoing with their cell phones?
Shooting at unarmed citizens, period, under any circumstance with any weapon should never be tolerated in a country supposedly founded on freedom and liberty.
if i feel my life or the lives of my family are threatened I will shoot your unarmed arse in the chest, and that is completely legal.
You sound mentally unstable.
Page 5 of 10
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News