- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Principled Massie had nothing to say about the Clintons skipping their Epstein hearing?
Posted on 1/14/26 at 1:36 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Posted on 1/14/26 at 1:36 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
It's not his fault that the DOJ has violated the law
He’s the one who drafted the bill giving the DOJ authority to withhold and redact at their discretion.
Stop being a moron ivory
1
Posted on 1/14/26 at 1:37 pm to David_DJS
quote:
quote:
Of course he didn't. He's only guided by what most nerds in opposition to this administration are guided by... his TDS.
You should read the entire thread before posting. Your MDS does you no favors.
frick that beta do-nothing grandstanding strongly worded tweet "principled" Liberaltarian RINO nerd. Probably finally got around to tweeting something 24 hours later because he knew what a TDS hypcrocrite he looked like if he didn't ultimately say something.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 1:39 pm to LittleJerrySeinfield
quote:
quote:
Like squirrels.
Always have nuts in their mouths
As you gargle on that wimp Massie's little balls...
Posted on 1/14/26 at 1:39 pm to BTROleMisser
I’m glad you are happy that the OP was incorrect.
Lots of angst for nothing.
Not unusual here though.
Lots of angst for nothing.
Not unusual here though.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 1:40 pm to BTROleMisser
quote:
As you gargle on that wimp Massie's little balls...
Get your own material, hack.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 1:40 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
According to whom.
The Department of Justice through Bondi and Blanche. Their letter to the court is linked in the article.
You're welcome. (Just in case you were breaking character and showing some common courtesy.)
Time: DOJ, less than 1% of Epstein Files released
Posted on 1/14/26 at 1:41 pm to LittleJerrySeinfield
quote:
Get your own material, hack.
K.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 1:42 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Less than one percent.
How much of that was blacked out?
That’s terrible.
How much of that was blacked out?
That’s terrible.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 1:46 pm to roadGator
I mean if time knows it’s only 1% and has the files they are free to release them. If you want to go by actual facts this administration and doj are the only ones in 30 years to release anything.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 1:51 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Just in case you were breaking character and showing some common courtesy.
you should read page two of the letter you cite. Tell me how the delay is unreasonable?This post was edited on 1/14/26 at 1:54 pm
Posted on 1/14/26 at 2:00 pm to SDVTiger
I admit when I am wrong. If more people did this the world would be a better place.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 2:02 pm to Jugbow
quote:
Massie isn’t MAGA he’s a libertarian RINO.
In political terms, what's the difference between a RINO and MAGA? I don't think there's much of a difference.
quote:
I don’t understand how it’s hard for you all to acknowledge that. Massie also talks shite daily about Trump/JE
Why would I acknowledge something I not only don't know, but don't give a frick about?
quote:
Why don’t all die on a hill for a Kentucky congressman? Don’t get it.
Nobody is dying anywhere. Massie means a shite ton more to those with MDS than he does to me. For me, he's good on spending, opposing Israel's outsized influence on American politics, and privacy issues - but he's a single house member, so not that powerful.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 2:04 pm to BTROleMisser
quote:
frick that beta do-nothing grandstanding strongly worded tweet "principled" Liberaltarian RINO nerd. Probably finally got around to tweeting something 24 hours later because he knew what a TDS hypcrocrite he looked like if he didn't ultimately say something.
Are you okay?
And yes, I'm sure you're right - he tweeted about the Clintons because he knew you were waiting to see if he did.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 2:06 pm to David_DJS
quote:
Nobody is dying anywhere. Massie means a shite ton more to those with MDS than he does to me. For me, he's good on spending, opposing Israel's outsized influence on American politics, and privacy issues - but he's a single house member, so not that powerful.
Yup yup yup
I wonder who keeps bringing up Massie?
Posted on 1/14/26 at 2:08 pm to roadGator
quote:
wonder who keeps bringing up Massie?
You massholes spent a month with non stop threads about his lame tweets abou the JE files
Now hes not at the mic to hold ppl accountable
You clown bots always embarrass yourselves
Posted on 1/14/26 at 2:09 pm to SDVTiger
Links?
Posted on 1/14/26 at 2:09 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
you should read page two of the letter you cite. Tell me how the delay is unreasonable?
You really ARE an unprincipled lout in discussions here. I have no doubt that you are an honorable and honest person IRL.
You asked me to substantiate the claim of less than 1%. I did, and pointed you to the letter.
Now, rather than acknowledge that, you switch the topic.
If compliance with the law were beyond the ability of the DOJ, Bondi and Blanche should have advised their boss of that BEFORE he signed Massie's bill into law.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 2:10 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
switch the topic.
MAGA specialty
Posted on 1/14/26 at 2:10 pm to SDVTiger
I like how they deflect when asked why Massie hasn’t named names when he’s noted as such a principled individual.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 2:23 pm to SloaneRanger
quote:
This should be the litmus test on the whole Epstein thing. If you’re not going to make the Clintons testify, then just drop the whole thing. You’re just not interested in the truth.
We absolutely know their actual intentions. If their actual intent were to really get to the bottom of everything... then Mr Microsoft would be under heavy scrutiny. The democrats who were running to him for donations would be scrutinized. They would be asked why a convicted predator was still in their contact lists. The democrats that were personally texting him during committee hearings would be scrutinized.
Yet..... zero bit of that is of any importance. For some reason.
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News