- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pretty compelling point about election fraud
Posted on 7/19/26 at 3:28 pm to Taxing Authority
Posted on 7/19/26 at 3:28 pm to Taxing Authority
Okay. Let’s match your proof of 2024 Trump favored election fraud versus the mountain of proof of 2020 election fraud on the part of Democrats (and some GOP) to get Biden elected. Show your work first… we’ve already posted the 2020 proof countless times on here over the last 5+ years.
Go…
Go…
1
Posted on 7/19/26 at 3:38 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
We definitely know there was no way Biden got over 80 million votes in 2020, outperforming Obama by 12 million votes.
How did Trump outperform Bush by almost 20 million votes. Clear sign of cheating.
I mean, there are like 40 million more people in the country since then.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 3:58 pm to DaBike
It's not just the raw numbers either.
For decades registered voter turnout hovered around 55%.
The vegetable - with no campaign to speak of - motivated Americans so much that voter turnout surged by 8%.
2024 was back down to ~55%, mostly due to the Republican parties election integrity efforts.
For decades registered voter turnout hovered around 55%.
The vegetable - with no campaign to speak of - motivated Americans so much that voter turnout surged by 8%.
2024 was back down to ~55%, mostly due to the Republican parties election integrity efforts.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 8:41 pm to Jesterea
quote:
It was the Agency for INTERNATIONAL development.
Yeah. And he’s still right. USAID should have been giving money where it was mutually beneficial for US and the country being helped.
Posted on 7/20/26 at 12:51 am to Taxing Authority
quote:
Are elections rigged or not?
Tampered with, absolutely.
Be clear what you mean by rigged, and ill give an answer
Posted on 7/20/26 at 5:52 am to Padme
37% of Republicans are in favor of abortion. Are you saying that 37% of Republicans cheated in the election?
Posted on 7/22/26 at 7:13 am to udtiger
Posted on 7/22/26 at 8:21 am to Auburn1968
quote:
They just had to make sure they didn't come up short like they did with Hillary no matter how painfully obvious the fraud was.
I just posted this the other day.
In all six swing states that Trump lost in 2020, one of them was by less than 2.75% of he vote. Two of them were between 1% and 2% and the remaining three were by less than 1% of the vote.
You're right, if massive amounts of dumping had occurred, you would expect to see that they had made sure that they had won the state, even if it made the dumping obvious, but that's not what happened.
Biden barely won those states.
The fewest polling sites in any of those states was 214. The most was 9,000.
I just can't believe that there could have been enough coordination between 9,000 polling sites to manipulate the vote such that Biden barely won by a razor thin margin.
Can you?
This post was edited on 7/22/26 at 8:30 am
Posted on 7/22/26 at 8:24 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Your TDS flare up is so glorioua
You are a drummer with only one fill in your reppatriore.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 8:26 am to BTROleMisser
quote:
we’ve already posted the 2020 proof
quote:
proof
Posted on 7/22/26 at 8:39 am to wackatimesthree
Also, the increase in votes between 2016 and 2020 is not unique.
Remember, each year that goes by there are more citizens registered to vote. Looking at raw numbers doesn't tell you anything. You have to look at the percentage of increase.
So 1992 saw a similar uptick of 14.21% of votes cast, which receded by 7.85% the next cycle. Ross Perot.
2004 saw an uptick of 15.87% of total votes cast. 911? Not sure.
2020 saw an uptick of 15.86%, followed by a recession of only 2.07%. So it went up slightly less and receded by significantly less than the 1992 election. And the explanation is obvious...COVID and mail in ballots.
Did all those mail in ballots provide an opportunity for fake vote dumping? Sure. And we know it happened. It's on video.
But the question is whether it happened enough to flip the election.
Almost all of the "proof" offered by people who "know" that to be the case falls apart when you look at it in context and fill in all the elements.
For a crime, you need motive, opportunity, and means.
Based on what I posted above, believing that the means existed to produce the specific outcome is just too hard for me to believe.
Remember, each year that goes by there are more citizens registered to vote. Looking at raw numbers doesn't tell you anything. You have to look at the percentage of increase.
So 1992 saw a similar uptick of 14.21% of votes cast, which receded by 7.85% the next cycle. Ross Perot.
2004 saw an uptick of 15.87% of total votes cast. 911? Not sure.
2020 saw an uptick of 15.86%, followed by a recession of only 2.07%. So it went up slightly less and receded by significantly less than the 1992 election. And the explanation is obvious...COVID and mail in ballots.
Did all those mail in ballots provide an opportunity for fake vote dumping? Sure. And we know it happened. It's on video.
But the question is whether it happened enough to flip the election.
Almost all of the "proof" offered by people who "know" that to be the case falls apart when you look at it in context and fill in all the elements.
For a crime, you need motive, opportunity, and means.
Based on what I posted above, believing that the means existed to produce the specific outcome is just too hard for me to believe.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 8:39 am to SlowFlowPro
termites : lakeshore light bulbs :: SlowFlowPro : electrion fraud threats
Posted on 7/22/26 at 8:52 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
just can't believe that there could have been enough coordination between 9,000 polling sites to manipulate the vote such that Biden barely won by a razor thin margin.
You do know that mail in votes go to a single counting facility, right? That 3am mail in vote dump after they knew how many they needed was the difference.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 9:01 am to udtiger
Posted on 7/22/26 at 9:07 am to DaBike
Rampant fraud in 2020 ... the Dems will literally stop at nothing to seize power.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 12:28 pm to dalefla
quote:
You do know that mail in votes go to a single counting facility, right?
I don't know who told you that, but that is determined according to state laws, and for the six swing states in question it is not true of any of them.
In Pennsylvania, Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia the absentee ballots were all counted at the county level. Yes, there was a large central facility in Fulton County, Georgia, but that was only one counting facility...it just happened to be the biggest one. Same in Wisconsin. Milwaukee had one large central counting location, but that was just for the city, not the whole state.
Wisconsin and Michigan count those ballots at the local/municipal level.
Even harder to coordinate in a conspiracy.
quote:
after they knew how many they needed
That's the point. The chances that they could "know how many they needed" is approaching zero as far as I can tell.
The states that count at the county level would have had to have coordinated a minimum of 17 absentee ballots counting sites and a maximum of 159.
Wisconsin and Michigan—since they counted at the local/municipal level—had over 3,300 different counting sites. Specifically for absentee ballots.
Also, remember, we're talking about margins of victory between 0.3% at the low end and 2.75% at the high end. Even if 95% of the votes had been counted by 3 a.m. (which was not the case in every one of these states), it's still not feasible to have estimated with that level of exactness how many votes needed to be added to get that tight a result, and to have done it SIX TIMES.
I just don't believe it's possible.
I know none of that will make any difference to you or anybody else who denies the election because it's what you want to believe, so you're going to believe it no matter what.
But I'm willing to believe either conclusion, and the data doesn't support that the cheating changed the outcome when I look at it in depth.
This post was edited on 7/22/26 at 12:30 pm
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News