Started By
Message

re: President Trump tweets response to Iran attacks

Posted on 1/7/20 at 8:30 pm to
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31526 posts
Posted on 1/7/20 at 8:30 pm to
I’m assuming these weren’t missiles built in 1920. They’d hit buildings. Nobody was in them?
Posted by GEAUXmedic
Premium Member
Member since Nov 2011
42053 posts
Posted on 1/7/20 at 8:30 pm to
Somewhat related.

quote:

@EQAlerts
#Earthquake M5.0 Southern Iran 7mins ago 8 Jan 02:20 UTC - report/info:
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71130 posts
Posted on 1/7/20 at 8:31 pm to
quote:

There is a lot of open space within bases. Ramps, airstrips, and just plain open fields.


And no guarantee that someone won't be at the wrong place at the wrong time. Bottom line, you can't prove they were purposefully avoiding killing someone when the missiles impact inside the wire.
Posted by cubsfan5150
NWA
Member since Nov 2007
18489 posts
Posted on 1/7/20 at 8:31 pm to
Did they actually impact inside the wire?
Posted by DawgCountry
Great State of GA
Member since Sep 2012
33318 posts
Posted on 1/7/20 at 8:31 pm to
“Earthquake”. AKA Trumps weather machine
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 1/7/20 at 8:32 pm to
quote:

I’m assuming these weren’t missiles built in 1920. They’d hit buildings. Nobody was in them?



Are you assuming they have an infinite supply? How do they pay for them? What happens when they run out? Ya think maybe we know how many they have?
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90529 posts
Posted on 1/7/20 at 8:32 pm to
Next to your barracks.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36708 posts
Posted on 1/7/20 at 8:33 pm to
Yeah, you can whisper to them and tell them where you want them to go, within reason. I'd have to assume that at this particular time we don't just have our people wandering throughout the entire premises. I think it's reasonable to believe that the Iranians could target a specific sector of a military base.
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71130 posts
Posted on 1/7/20 at 8:33 pm to
I don't know.

But even if they didn't, it doesn't matter. They took a shot at American servicemen. We are allowed to retort.
Posted by BallsEleven
Member since Mar 2019
6163 posts
Posted on 1/7/20 at 8:33 pm to
No you can’t prove it. But looking at their target sites and the minimal damage/casualties being reported, it’s reasonable to say they didn’t want to inflict mass casualties to US troops. There are much closer targets for that.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31526 posts
Posted on 1/7/20 at 8:34 pm to
quote:

Are you assuming they have an infinite supply? How do they pay for them? What happens when they run out? Ya think maybe we know how many they have?



What does that have to do with it?
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71130 posts
Posted on 1/7/20 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

Yeah, you can whisper to them and tell them where you want them to go, within reason.


If they were indeed ballistic missiles, they were guided by gravity more so than by a computer.
This post was edited on 1/7/20 at 8:35 pm
Posted by Sneaky__Sally
Member since Jul 2015
12364 posts
Posted on 1/7/20 at 8:35 pm to
Also the estimated 2000 missiles earlier
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61428 posts
Posted on 1/7/20 at 8:36 pm to
quote:

#Earthquake M5.0 Southern Iran 7mins ago 8 Jan 02:20 UTC - report/info:

Now this is interesting.
Posted by MrLSU
Yellowstone, Val d'isere
Member since Jan 2004
29730 posts
Posted on 1/7/20 at 8:36 pm to
Iran took out the Kiwi's Iraq position.

New Zealand's Otago Daily Times Defence force investigating claims NZ base has been hit

The Kiwi's left earlier today and moved to Kuwait and now the New Zealand Defense Force is reporting the Iranians hit the Kiwi's base.
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71130 posts
Posted on 1/7/20 at 8:36 pm to
quote:

But looking at their target sites and the minimal damage/casualties being reported, it’s reasonable to say they didn’t want to inflict mass casualties to US troops.


It's also reasonable to say that their shite sucks and they missed due to the fact that they have inferior technology and personnel.

Posted by Sneaky__Sally
Member since Jul 2015
12364 posts
Posted on 1/7/20 at 8:37 pm to
Seems unlikely
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71130 posts
Posted on 1/7/20 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

Seems unlikely


It seems very likely. Iran is no where near the level people think they are. If this were a video game, the United States would be maxed out at level 100 while the Iranians would be hovering down around level 11 or 12.

Posted by Dodd
Member since Oct 2003
21122 posts
Posted on 1/7/20 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

Iran took & concluded proportionate measures in self-defense under Article 51 of UN Charter targeting base from which cowardly armed attack against our citizens & senior officials were launched. We do not seek escalation or war, but will defend ourselves against any aggression.


Per Javad Zarif on the twitter machine. The “concluded” part is important. Tucker called it. All for show to say we responded.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31526 posts
Posted on 1/7/20 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

The Kiwi's left earlier today and moved to Kuwait and now the New Zealand Defense Force is reporting the Iranians hit the Kiwi's base.



So they fired on a base they knew was empty.
Jump to page
Page First 40 41 42 43 44 ... 46
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 42 of 46Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram