- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: President Trump says Gavin Newsom SHOULD BE ARRESTED
Posted on 6/9/25 at 12:50 pm to theballguy
Posted on 6/9/25 at 12:50 pm to theballguy
Exactly. Nobody ever gets arrested.
0
Posted on 6/9/25 at 12:50 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
I didn’t compare it to what Trump did. I simply said jailing a political opponent is what the democrats did to Trump. I also pointed out the Gavin is actually committing a crime. Nothing Trump did in 2021 was a crime. Keep up.
Define your case. What is the supposed crime? Inciting a riot? Trump did that.
You are the one claiming a crime without actually stating said crime, because there is not one.
You just keep saying you could lay out a case. What is the supposed crime? How are you justifying cause for it to be considered a crime?
Some lawyer.
This post was edited on 6/9/25 at 12:52 pm
Posted on 6/9/25 at 12:52 pm to BBONDS25
Thin....like Kate Moss profile thin, on a good Friday in October. At this point he's nowhere close to any crime.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 12:52 pm to BBONDS25
Bb: does he have a case?
Me: no chance in hell.
You: I agree, but here’s a goofy hypothetical that’ll never happen but I’ll argue about it against nobody anyway. I am a smart.
Me: no chance in hell.
You: I agree, but here’s a goofy hypothetical that’ll never happen but I’ll argue about it against nobody anyway. I am a smart.
This post was edited on 6/9/25 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 6/9/25 at 12:54 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:
Define your case. What is the supposed crime?
18 USC 1505
quote:
Inciting a riot? Trump did that.
Wrong. His exact words from that day were to “protest peacefully and patriotically.” Were you not aware of that?
quote:
You are the one claiming a crime without actually stating said crime, because there is not one.
Wrong
quote:
Some lawyer.
Thanks. I’m a former prosecutor. So understanding elements isn’t all that difficult. Let me know if you need any more help.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 12:55 pm to mwade91383
quote:
Bb: does he have a case? Me: no chance in hell. You: I agree, but here’s a goofy hypothetical that’ll never happen but I’ll argue about it against nobody anyway. I am a smart.
Wrong. I never asked if he had a case. I stated that he did in response to you saying he didn’t. You’re still struggling to keep up.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 12:56 pm to sorantable
quote:
He won’t beat the fascism charges with rhetoric like this.
according to limp dicks like you he wouldn’t beat those charges even before this comment.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 12:59 pm to BBONDS25
FFS you clown, BB is Bobboucher who posed the question that I responded to.
For somebody accusing others of failing to keep up, TAKE YOUR OWN ADVICE!
For somebody accusing others of failing to keep up, TAKE YOUR OWN ADVICE!
Posted on 6/9/25 at 1:01 pm to mwade91383
quote:
FFS you clown, BB is Bobboucher who posed the question that I responded to.
Where did I ever agree with you there is no case as you claimed? Also…it isn’t a big leap to understand why I would think BB referred to me. Again. Keep up.
This post was edited on 6/9/25 at 1:02 pm
Posted on 6/9/25 at 1:02 pm to Chancellor
quote:
If Fox News ever goes out of business and off the air, Pam Bondi may have some free time to get around to doing that.
Finger Wagging Pam!!
Posted on 6/9/25 at 1:03 pm to EZE Tiger Fan
quote:
LOL that's stupid as frick.
The OP (Chicom John Bot) and your reply (useful idiot insta reply) perfectly encapsulate how fricking retarded the internet has made most people.
OP, as he does 30 times a day, starts an OUTRAGEOUS HEADLINE thread based on a fricking throwaway comment in a “walking to AF1 impromptu press mini conference” by President Trump.
Lazy or retarded people see the headline of the thread and immediately jump to some emotional melt, when if they had bothered to read/watch the source they would have seen two things. First, OP is a dishonest retarded attention whore, second that the comment was just part of riff/routine that Trump has done for. 40 years.
The Governor of California is not getting arrested.
Get a grip on yourself dude.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 1:05 pm to John Barron
Just do it Trump. Send him to El Salvador.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 1:10 pm to BBONDS25
Well I wrote BB/me/you and not you/me/you. Why would I call you two different things?
Maybe if you were better at reading comprehension (or keeping up with the thread itself) this wouldn’t be so hard for you, amirite??!?
If you have a legitimate point about the validity of the claim or a potential GN arrest, just spit it out already. Nobody cares about never gonna happen hypotheticals.
Maybe if you were better at reading comprehension (or keeping up with the thread itself) this wouldn’t be so hard for you, amirite??!?
If you have a legitimate point about the validity of the claim or a potential GN arrest, just spit it out already. Nobody cares about never gonna happen hypotheticals.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 1:12 pm to John Barron
Won't happen. Which leads me to the next point. I predict Bondi will be out as AG this time next year. Patel will be out and Bongino will be out and back doing podcasts.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 1:13 pm to mwade91383
quote:
Maybe if you were better at reading comprehension
The fact you think that has anything to do with reading comprehension is sad.
quote:
If you have a legitimate point about the validity of the claim or a potential GN arrest, just spit it out already. Nobody cares about never gonna happen hypotheticals.
I already posted the Code section. Is you missing that a reading comprehension problem?
Posted on 6/9/25 at 1:16 pm to BBONDS25
Still refuse to explicitly state what legitimate case can be made against Newsom.
Prosecutors are some of the worst people on Earth, so please pat yourself on the back as if it is supposed to make you somehow ethical.
Anyone can bring a case, it doesn’t make it legitimate. We saw that with many of the Trump cases, but as a typical hypocrite, the right wing nut jobs bitch about lawfare and the. Use it themselves.
Pathetic.
Prosecutors are some of the worst people on Earth, so please pat yourself on the back as if it is supposed to make you somehow ethical.
Anyone can bring a case, it doesn’t make it legitimate. We saw that with many of the Trump cases, but as a typical hypocrite, the right wing nut jobs bitch about lawfare and the. Use it themselves.
Pathetic.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 1:16 pm to BBONDS25
Why would anyone would care about a certain code pertaining to an arrest that nobody thinks will ever happen?
Like if you’re arguing there are lawyers that will take someone’s money and make up some goofy legal narrative, we agree!
Like if you’re arguing there are lawyers that will take someone’s money and make up some goofy legal narrative, we agree!
Posted on 6/9/25 at 1:17 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:
the right wing nut jobs bitch about lawfare and the. Use it themselves.
Where?Posted on 6/9/25 at 1:18 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:
Still refuse to explicitly state what legitimate case can be made against Newsom.
I listed the code section. Did you look it up? Could you not determine which part of that code and its elements are being met by Newsome? If so I can help you out some more. I just assumed you would be able to get it by reading the Code. My fault for giving you the benefit of the doubt.
quote:
Prosecutors are some of the worst people on Earth, so please pat yourself on the back as if it is supposed to make you somehow ethical.
Blanket statements are made by some of the worst people on earth.
I never mentioned ethics. I mentioned the ability to understand elements of a crime. Something you admittedly can’t do. quote:
Pathetic
Indeed.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 1:19 pm to Jbird
The entire immigration attacks on students is lawfare. Making ridiculous claims to silence speech against a foreign nation is lawfare buddy.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News