- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
President Trump Facing Growing Pressure to Restrict U.S. Oil Exports
Posted on 8/10/26 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 8/10/26 at 12:10 pm
quote:
The U.S. oil industry got a scare last week. News reports claimed that the Trump administration may be considering an export ban on crude oil and refined petroleum products such as gasoline and diesel in order to bring those prices down—prices which have been elevated considerably by the reduction of oil supplies worldwide in the wake of the Iran war. But a Trump administration spokesperson said the administration has no plans to ban exports of oil or natural gas products.
It's important to note that there is an old adage in Washington, D.C.: "Nothing is true until it is officially denied." The administration has probably discussed such a ban. Whether it will implement one is the question. With exports of distillate fuels (which include diesel and fuel oil) hitting the highest on record and gasoline exports bouncing between about 750,000 and 1 million barrels per day, American consumers may be wondering why the administration doesn't act now.
quote:
The oil industry has always enjoyed the right to export refined products such as gasoline and diesel. The U.S. has refinery capacity in excess of its needs, and so the industry has sold the excess abroad. Only more recently did the industry gain the unfettered right to export crude oil and natural gas, arguing that nearly every other American industry has the right to sell its products to the highest bidder across the world. Why should the oil and gas industry be singled out? Well, it no longer is, and it's been that way for more than a decade.
quote:
To implement an export ban, the president would have to declare an emergency. It's not hard to see how the closing of the Strait of Hormuz by Iran would be seen as an emergency. But it's not clear how much such a ban would lower prices. It depends on whether such a ban included refined products such as gasoline and diesel and not just crude oil. As it turns out, not all oil is the same. The United States produces more than it needs of what is called light sweet crude ("sweet" because it is low in sulfur content, a pollutant that must be removed) and less than it needs of what is called heavy sour crude (which, not surprisingly, has higher sulfur content).
U.S. refineries are set up to use a certain mix of light and heavy crude; hence we export some light crude and import some heavy crude to get the right supply of both. Therefore, restricting exports of light crude won't help refineries make more finished products since the key to that is having the aforementioned right balance of light and heavy crude.
My guess is that unless gasoline and diesel prices remain elevated for months more, export controls will remain off the table. But if the high prices don't dissipate by then, the American public will be clamoring for a solution. Don't be surprised if the opposition party starts pounding the table for some type of export restrictions in order to score some points with the public and against the president.
LINK
Posted on 8/10/26 at 12:18 pm to ragincajun03
News reports claimed….
Posted on 8/10/26 at 12:23 pm to ragincajun03
Yeah he’s between a rock and a hard place. Big profits for oil companies means high prices for citizens. Muh Capitalism.
Posted on 8/10/26 at 12:42 pm to RCDfan1950
I drill for oil and now I can’t sell it to whoever I want!?
What kind of country is this?
What kind of country is this?
Posted on 8/10/26 at 12:50 pm to SlidellCajun
Well you can, SC, until the Democratic Socialists kinda ‘Nationalize’ the oil companies via Democracy. The entitlement demographic is growing by leaps and bounds.
Trump is going to have to pull a drastic and ugly move to take out the IRGC. It’ll be the same here with the Dem Socialists, rigged vote elections and partisan Judiciary.
Headed to the streets sooner or later. That is the historical norm.
Trump is going to have to pull a drastic and ugly move to take out the IRGC. It’ll be the same here with the Dem Socialists, rigged vote elections and partisan Judiciary.
Headed to the streets sooner or later. That is the historical norm.
Posted on 8/10/26 at 1:46 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
The oil industry has always enjoyed the right to export refined products such as gasoline and diesel. The U.S. has refinery capacity in excess of its needs, and so the industry has sold the excess abroad.
So, what you're saying is if the industry lowered the price of gasoline and diesel to the American people, there would be no excess to ship, right?
Maybe we can finally get to the bottom of it. After all, what does shipping cost add to the gallon cost of each? What percentage of the cost is a tax of any kind to the consumer?
Posted on 8/10/26 at 1:53 pm to RCDfan1950
quote:
Yeah he’s between a rock and a hard place. Big profits for oil companies means high prices for citizens. Muh Capitalism.
How much did you pay for your last automobile? Did you bitch about it?
The highest earning company in this country and likely the world is Google. Do they make too much?
Posted on 8/10/26 at 3:49 pm to ragincajun03
The American people seem to have a disconnect when it comes to “US oil”
I think everyone understands when we talk about American cars, we all immediately know the US government does not produce any cars. At no point in the manufacturing process does the government own any of these cars. Pretty obvious.
But somehow people hear American oil and they think that the government owns the oil or even produces oil.
The US oil everyone thinks about is mostly owned by either private land owners or massive multinational oil companies. Around 15% of production comes from government owned land but it is only produced by multinational corporations.
For the average American the fact that the US leads the world in oil production means approximately squat. Unless the congress acts (lol) or the president declares a national emergency that oil may as well be produced in Timbuktu.
ETA of course it provides security and stability as well and that should not be overlooked.
I think everyone understands when we talk about American cars, we all immediately know the US government does not produce any cars. At no point in the manufacturing process does the government own any of these cars. Pretty obvious.
But somehow people hear American oil and they think that the government owns the oil or even produces oil.
The US oil everyone thinks about is mostly owned by either private land owners or massive multinational oil companies. Around 15% of production comes from government owned land but it is only produced by multinational corporations.
For the average American the fact that the US leads the world in oil production means approximately squat. Unless the congress acts (lol) or the president declares a national emergency that oil may as well be produced in Timbuktu.
ETA of course it provides security and stability as well and that should not be overlooked.
Posted on 8/10/26 at 4:09 pm to ragincajun03
Won’t happen. Big donor and corporate money wins the argument.
Posted on 8/10/26 at 4:15 pm to SlidellCajun
There are a number of items and materials that have export restrictions already. Most deal with technology or military. Crude oil could be loosely considered “military”, in the current context. Examples:
Dual-use items: items that have been designed for civilian use but which have potential military or security uses and are specified in the respective lists of dual-use items subject to controls (“Dual-use Lists”). The main categories include: nuclear; advanced machine tools; pathogens and toxins; toxic and high energy chemicals; high strength materials; high specification semiconductors, electronics, computers and telecommunications; cryptography; lasers, optics and sonar; navigation and avionics; submersibles; and aerospace and space;
Dual-use items: items that have been designed for civilian use but which have potential military or security uses and are specified in the respective lists of dual-use items subject to controls (“Dual-use Lists”). The main categories include: nuclear; advanced machine tools; pathogens and toxins; toxic and high energy chemicals; high strength materials; high specification semiconductors, electronics, computers and telecommunications; cryptography; lasers, optics and sonar; navigation and avionics; submersibles; and aerospace and space;
Posted on 8/10/26 at 5:48 pm to Woolfpack
quote:
The American people seem to have a disconnect when it comes to “US oil”
Exactly. They gripe about oil, gas, or diesel price but say absolutely nothing about the price of tech or medicine.
Yet tech has driven the price of vehicles up considerably with all of the tech bells and whistles. The tech billionaires do what they want without any entity saying ..........
TOO MUCH PROFIT!!
Now, medical and medicine prices are unconscionably high and, of course, tech plays a part.
Popular
Back to top
5







