- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: POTUS new statement on Mark Levin. Defends him against certain “conservatives”
Posted on 3/16/26 at 8:31 am to Flats
Posted on 3/16/26 at 8:31 am to Flats
quote:
Sometimes in an effort to play the board contrarian he gets out too far over his skis.
It’s beyond a desire to be perceived as a contrarian. Everything he does is an effort to inflate his own ego.
0
Posted on 3/16/26 at 8:33 am to Earnest_P
quote:
Trump has lost his mind.
Trump is in DC surrounded by people who make billions from exercising our military, and we all know whoever surrounds him and tells him what he wants to hear damn near always wins.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 9:33 am to tide06
quote:
Kushner ran the late 45 WH and I suspect he’s guiding foreign policy less than two years into the 47WH which is why you’re getting what you’re getting. He wants an ascendant Israel with a broken Iran within a Middle East run under the framework of the Abraham
Is he wrong?
Would you rather see a Middle East under the hegemony of Israel and the Abraham Accords or one under the hegemony of Iran and its proxies Hezbollah and Hamas.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 10:04 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Trump is wrong on this one. Levin is a nut case. I use to like listening to him many years ago but his unhinged behavior recently calling out Tucker, Meghan Kelly, and others as anti semetic, is no different from those who scream racism to those who disagree with other policies.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 10:15 am to Great Plains Drifter
quote:
Well, I just never recall you as a poster who necessarily ever spoke to anything being wrong with the present system that needed addressed or corrected.
Then you haven't paid attention.
I'm one of the few small government types left. By definition, that is anti-establishment and rejects the entirety of the present system.
quote:
Your main efforts in recent years are always generally geared towards pointing out what you see as the wrongness of MAGA types who have not liked what the current system has evolved to come and represent.
Within that context, I criticize those who have developed the philosophy that they need to wield that government to respond to perceived slights.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 10:16 am to 14&Counting
quote:
Would you rather see a Middle East under the hegemony of Israel and the Abraham Accords or one under the hegemony of Iran and its proxies Hezbollah and Hamas.
Iran has never had the capability to be a hegemon in the ME. Stop.
Ignoring Israel, Saudi Arabia and Iraq would never allow that
Posted on 3/16/26 at 10:26 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Now that Trump has spoken, the low-IQ MAGA bots will suddenly change their opinions and agree without a second thought
The right has become the left
Believe what they are told to believe and cancel those who dare to ask questions
The right has become the left
Believe what they are told to believe and cancel those who dare to ask questions
This post was edited on 3/16/26 at 10:27 am
Posted on 3/16/26 at 10:28 am to 14&Counting
The status quo was quad control with power divided between Iran (China client), Saudi (US client), Israel and with the US playing whack a mole sponsored by Raytheon.
A belligerent Iran kept Saudi and Israel unified as pro-US voices in the region.
If Iran ends in chaos it means neither needs us anymore and will likely become antagonistic towards each other as Israel pursues its aims to become a regional hegemon which is of course counter to Saudi interests.
If Iran ends without actual regime change they will lean even closer to China which is exactly what we don’t want to have happen and exactly where we currently are.
The best case scenario would be actual pro-US regime change which means the Middle East becomes a stabl-ish US sandbox but I believe that would require ground troops to accomplish.
The fact that this scenario doesn’t empower Israel to pursue their expansionist goals means I believe they’d actually prefer the Iranian civil war option which is why we heard their proxies like Lyndsey Graham say rebuilding/stable Iran isn’t our problem.
So no, I would’ve preferred no intervention outside of nuclear prevention.
Now we have to decide between ground troops to win all the way or walking away which leaves Iran in Chinas lap so I’m extremely pissed particularly with the messaging and lack of planning from the WH on all of this.
A belligerent Iran kept Saudi and Israel unified as pro-US voices in the region.
If Iran ends in chaos it means neither needs us anymore and will likely become antagonistic towards each other as Israel pursues its aims to become a regional hegemon which is of course counter to Saudi interests.
If Iran ends without actual regime change they will lean even closer to China which is exactly what we don’t want to have happen and exactly where we currently are.
The best case scenario would be actual pro-US regime change which means the Middle East becomes a stabl-ish US sandbox but I believe that would require ground troops to accomplish.
The fact that this scenario doesn’t empower Israel to pursue their expansionist goals means I believe they’d actually prefer the Iranian civil war option which is why we heard their proxies like Lyndsey Graham say rebuilding/stable Iran isn’t our problem.
So no, I would’ve preferred no intervention outside of nuclear prevention.
Now we have to decide between ground troops to win all the way or walking away which leaves Iran in Chinas lap so I’m extremely pissed particularly with the messaging and lack of planning from the WH on all of this.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 10:34 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Limbaugh called him "The Great One" and GEOTUS calls him "a truly great American patriot".
Yeah, but that guy who posts about Muh Worldwide Joobs Control The Known Universe Conspiracy 24/7/365 knows better.
Imma listen to that guy. Oh, and Candace just dropped a video! Happy Day!
Yeah, but that guy who posts about Muh Worldwide Joobs Control The Known Universe Conspiracy 24/7/365 knows better.
Imma listen to that guy. Oh, and Candace just dropped a video! Happy Day!
Posted on 3/16/26 at 10:38 am to monsterballads
quote:
Mark Levin is pure Israel first warmongering scum. The fact that his is so close to trump now after hating him from 2015 should tell you what you need to know
I was kinda alluding to something in my post
quote:
He’s not America first. He’s Israel first. Him and Ben Shapiro. All scum bags who have duped Christian conservatives for years
Yeah, that is where I was going
Posted on 3/16/26 at 10:44 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
ANDDDD...the Teenager-in-Chief weighs in again!!
This time with a tweet so truly remarkably absurd and cartoonish that even PT Barnum would blush. What a doozie.
The "Peace President" punctuates his rambling, silly defense of rage-a-holic lunatic Levin by tooting his tin-horn:
"....I HAVE BUILT A GREAT MILITARY....TO ACHIEVE EVERLASTING PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH!!"
"Everlasting peace."
Riiiiight.
This time with a tweet so truly remarkably absurd and cartoonish that even PT Barnum would blush. What a doozie.
The "Peace President" punctuates his rambling, silly defense of rage-a-holic lunatic Levin by tooting his tin-horn:
"....I HAVE BUILT A GREAT MILITARY....TO ACHIEVE EVERLASTING PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH!!"
"Everlasting peace."
Riiiiight.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 12:18 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Bad Trump
Posted on 3/16/26 at 12:40 pm to tide06
quote:When was the last time we have successfully accomplished that? How many times have we tried in the past 50 years? Two dozen?
The best case scenario would be actual pro-US regime change
Posted on 3/16/26 at 12:48 pm to 94LSU
quote:
When was the last time we have successfully accomplished that? How many times have we tried in the past 50 years? Two dozen?
Rarely in a heavily Islamic nation that’s for sure.
Which again is one of the two reasons I didn’t want it to happen.
Posted on 3/16/26 at 1:01 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Damn, so orange man really is bad? Ain’t that some shite
Posted on 3/16/26 at 1:40 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
They have both done a hell of a lot more for this country than you have.
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News