- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Poliboard Poll: Should Convicted Felons get rights restored?
Posted on 5/15/21 at 12:50 pm to BamaCoaster
Posted on 5/15/21 at 12:50 pm to BamaCoaster
NO!
Posted on 5/15/21 at 12:55 pm to BamaCoaster
I don’t understand the logic of this thread.
It seems to be well laid out the lifetime sentence of committing a felony in terms of some of your general rights. Why does the completion of part of your sentence end the other parts?
They can petition the law to change it, but the loss of rights for life is part of the original punishment. Don’t do the crime if you aren’t prepared for the consequences.
It seems to be well laid out the lifetime sentence of committing a felony in terms of some of your general rights. Why does the completion of part of your sentence end the other parts?
They can petition the law to change it, but the loss of rights for life is part of the original punishment. Don’t do the crime if you aren’t prepared for the consequences.
This post was edited on 5/15/21 at 12:56 pm
Posted on 5/15/21 at 12:59 pm to Colonel Flagg
What about perjury traps and process crimes that were only charged after, say, the FBI became so frustrated with you for their being wrong about what they first came after you for? Manufactured one of those charges against you out of spite. Seems like we've seen this corrupt act time and time again. So what about cases like that?
Posted on 5/15/21 at 1:00 pm to davyjones
quote:
What about perjury traps and process crimes that were only charged after, say, the FBI became so frustrated with you for their being wrong about what they first came after you for? Manufactured one of those charges against you out of spite. Seems like we've seen this corrupt act time and time again. So what about cases like that?
Then you petition to get your rights back. It happens and people do get them back.
Posted on 5/15/21 at 1:01 pm to BamaCoaster
quote:
One of those is not like the others
When your crime affects others well being, you don't deserve restoration of rights.
Posted on 5/15/21 at 1:03 pm to SpotCheckBilly
Of course. That's the current reality of the situation. I figured I was just responding to the hypothetical concept of it not being allowed under the law at all. Perhaps my shot missed the target. I ain't gonna lie, it happens with davyjones.
Posted on 5/16/21 at 2:47 am to BamaCoaster
Of course they should get their rights restored. Every American deserves the right to vote and the right to bear arms. What part of "Shall not be infringed" is unclear. It is an inalienable right, we all possess it when we are born and cannot be taken away for any reason. How hard is it for people to understand that everybody has a right to be armed to protect themselves from attack and tyranny. More guns = less violence, more peace, more freedom. I don't care if they are a hardened convicted gangbanger...that person may be in danger due to their criminal environment and history, and they might be the American who needs right to bear arms most of all
Posted on 5/16/21 at 6:56 am to IceburgSlim
According to the law ....every citizen does not have the right to vote, nor to bear arms .....
Most people do not realize that the simple Felony Charge goes on your record. You don't have to be convicted.
Example: Florida passed the Jessica Lundsford Act. It dictated that anyone with a FELONY could not go onto school property. All contractors ...everyone was under the law.
Overnight, our Official's Association lost 100 members.
Two were ridiculous because of untried, unconvicted Felonies.
One in particular .... Navy Seaman, returning from Viet Nam. Once on shore in the US, getting out of the Navy. Leaving the ship, he's stopped and searched. About a pound of Marijuana in his bag. Because he's on US soil, charged with possession. It was never tried, because the Navy was giving him his discharge. The simple charge got him booted out until the Florida Legislation got hammered by the oversight. The law was amended to remove simple charge and no trial situations.
Most people do not realize that the simple Felony Charge goes on your record. You don't have to be convicted.
Example: Florida passed the Jessica Lundsford Act. It dictated that anyone with a FELONY could not go onto school property. All contractors ...everyone was under the law.
Overnight, our Official's Association lost 100 members.
Two were ridiculous because of untried, unconvicted Felonies.
One in particular .... Navy Seaman, returning from Viet Nam. Once on shore in the US, getting out of the Navy. Leaving the ship, he's stopped and searched. About a pound of Marijuana in his bag. Because he's on US soil, charged with possession. It was never tried, because the Navy was giving him his discharge. The simple charge got him booted out until the Florida Legislation got hammered by the oversight. The law was amended to remove simple charge and no trial situations.
Posted on 5/16/21 at 7:12 am to bluedragon
quote:
One in particular .... Navy Seaman, returning from Viet Nam. Once on shore in the US, getting out of the Navy. Leaving the ship, he's stopped and searched. About a pound of Marijuana in his bag. Because he's on US soil, charged with possession. It was never tried, because the Navy was giving him his discharge. The simple charge got him booted out until the Florida Legislation got hammered by the oversight. The law was amended to remove simple charge and no trial situations.
If they decide not to charge, was there a crime?
Posted on 5/16/21 at 7:34 am to BamaCoaster
All rights bestowed upon us by our founding fathers should be restored; however, voting wasn’t viewed as a right but rather a privilege.
So, no to voting. A convicted felon has demonstrated lack of judgment on a massive scale, why would I want them making decisions for me and my family.
In this country we have made voting a human right. It was never meant to be that, it was meant to be a privilege bestowed upon land owners. Land owners at the time were considered people who made smart decisions and who had something to lose if this experiment went down the tubes.
So, no to voting. A convicted felon has demonstrated lack of judgment on a massive scale, why would I want them making decisions for me and my family.
In this country we have made voting a human right. It was never meant to be that, it was meant to be a privilege bestowed upon land owners. Land owners at the time were considered people who made smart decisions and who had something to lose if this experiment went down the tubes.
Posted on 5/16/21 at 7:39 am to BamaCoaster
My personal feelings are if you paid your debt as charged then you should upon completion regain your rights.
Posted on 5/16/21 at 8:42 am to SpotCheckBilly
quote:
I believe they can petition to have their rights restored and some do. I'm good with that.
Amen. Same.
Posted on 5/16/21 at 8:53 am to BamaCoaster
I’m a Probation and Parole Officer with 32 years experience in both state and federal levels.
My answer is YES. Once a person has served their time and completed whatever a court required them to do, they have earned back their rights. There is no reason to continue to punish a person after they have fulfilled their obligation.
The CJ system is about punishment and rehabilitation. Restoration of civil rights is the final step in that process.
My answer is YES. Once a person has served their time and completed whatever a court required them to do, they have earned back their rights. There is no reason to continue to punish a person after they have fulfilled their obligation.
The CJ system is about punishment and rehabilitation. Restoration of civil rights is the final step in that process.
Posted on 5/16/21 at 8:54 am to BamaCoaster
Once they've paid their debt to society, yes.
If they're that bad they should still be in prison.
If they're that bad they should still be in prison.
Posted on 5/16/21 at 9:00 am to SpotCheckBilly
quote:
I believe they can petition to have their rights restored and some do. I'm good with that.
Yeah, I know someone who committed a felony at 18 and when he got out a few years later, completely turned his life around and now has a family and a great job and from what I hear from those who used to know him, is nothing like the punk that got himself arrested years ago. There’s a lot of stuff he says he isn’t allowed to do but he accepts it because he knows he did it to himself.
Posted on 5/16/21 at 9:14 am to BamaCoaster
quote:
After someone is convicted of a felony, after they serve their sentence, should they be able to own a firearm and vote, or is the felony label a scarlet letter they should wear forever?
If the felony was not one of violence, then I think they should have their right to own a firearm restored. If the felony is one of violence, then that is a scarlet letter for firearm, forever, IMHO.
A felon should never have the right to vote restored.
This post was edited on 5/16/21 at 9:15 am
Posted on 5/16/21 at 10:03 am to Ace Midnight
The loss of those rights is part of the punishment for committing a felony. Jail time and fines are also part of the punishment. Just because you complete part of the sentence, doesn't mean you complete all of the sentence.
I don't see that we have a problem. Dems see it as a way to potentially attract more voters, that's all this is, nothing more.
Let them petition to get some or all of their rights restored. In most cases, I would favor them being restored, but not in all, and therefore there should be no restoration for every felon.
I don't see that we have a problem. Dems see it as a way to potentially attract more voters, that's all this is, nothing more.
Let them petition to get some or all of their rights restored. In most cases, I would favor them being restored, but not in all, and therefore there should be no restoration for every felon.
Posted on 5/17/21 at 3:09 pm to BamaCoaster
quote:
BamaCoaster
One of those is not like the others.
I have worked in law enforcement and seen the effects of drug dealing to both users and dealers. Too many innocent people get hurt in the drug trade. People who peddle narcotics are scum and not redeemable.
Posted on 5/17/21 at 3:10 pm to BamaCoaster
I voted Yes for that here in Cali
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News